• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Supporting women's research in predominantly undergraduate institutions: Experiences with a National Science Foundation ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Award.在以本科生为主的院校中支持女性科研:美国国家科学基金会“推进机构转型奖”的经验
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 16;13:817269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817269. eCollection 2022.
2
Enhancing Institutional Research Capacity: Results and Lessons from a Pilot Project Program.提升机构研究能力:一个试点项目计划的成果与经验教训
J Res Adm. 2018 Fall;49(2):64-90.
3
The Social Science of Institutional Transformation: Intersectional Change in the Academy.制度转型的社会科学:学术界的交叉性变革
Front Sociol. 2022 Apr 14;7:824497. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.824497. eCollection 2022.
4
Developing a State University System Model to Diversify Faculty in the Biomedical Sciences.开发一个州立大学系统模型,以实现生物医学科学领域教师队伍的多元化。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 17;13:734145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.734145. eCollection 2022.
5
Creating an inclusive community for BIPOC faculty: women of color in academia.为有色人种教员创建一个包容性社区:学术界的有色人种女性。
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(11):246. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00555-w. Epub 2022 Oct 30.
6
The Women in Medicine and Health Science program: an innovative initiative to support female faculty at the University of California Davis School of Medicine.医学与健康科学领域女性项目:一项支持加州大学戴维斯分校医学院女性教员的创新举措。
Acad Med. 2014 Nov;89(11):1462-6. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000403.
7
Recruitment, Promotion, and Retention of Women in Academic Medicine: How Institutions Are Addressing Gender Disparities.学术医学领域女性的招聘、晋升与留用:机构如何应对性别差异
Womens Health Issues. 2017 May-Jun;27(3):374-381. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.11.003. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
8
The Impacts of the Molecular Education and Research Consortium in Undergraduate Computational Chemistry on the Careers of Women in Computational Chemistry.分子教育与研究联盟对本科计算化学中女性职业发展的影响。
J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Dec 26;62(24):6316-6322. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00566. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
9
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
10
Partnered research experiences for junior faculty at minority-serving institutions enhance professional success.少数民族服务机构的初级教员的合作研究经验能提高专业成就。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2013 Fall;12(3):394-402. doi: 10.1187/cbe.13-02-0025.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic roots of academic faculty.学术人员的社会经济根源。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Dec;6(12):1625-1633. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01425-4. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
2
U.S. Women Faculty in the Social Sciences Also Face Gender Inequalities.美国社会科学领域的女性教员也面临性别不平等问题。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:792756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.792756. eCollection 2022.
3
Equal Representation Does Not Mean Equal Opportunity: Women Academics Perceive a Thicker Glass Ceiling in Social and Behavioral Fields Than in the Natural Sciences and Economics.平等代表权并不意味着平等机会:女性学者认为,社会和行为领域的玻璃天花板比自然科学和经济学领域的更厚。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 16;13:790211. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.790211. eCollection 2022.
4
Development and validation of contextual measures of sexual harassment perceptions, experiences, and coping for women employees in Ethiopian hospitality workplaces.埃塞俄比亚酒店工作场所女性员工性骚扰认知、经历及应对情境测量方法的开发与验证
Arch Public Health. 2022 Feb 18;80(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00828-z.
5
Why so Few, Still? Challenges to Attracting, Advancing, and Keeping Women Faculty of Color in Academia.为何仍然如此之少?吸引、提升和留住学术界有色人种女性教员面临的挑战。
Front Sociol. 2022 Jan 18;6:792198. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.792198. eCollection 2021.
6
Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles.高影响力期刊文章中的引文存在性别差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2114509. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.14509.
7
Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM.学术界的性别不平等:STEM 领域女性教职员工面临的问题与解决方案。
J Neurosci Res. 2021 Jan;99(1):13-23. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24631. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
8
The Future of Women in Psychological Science.女性在心理科学中的未来。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 May;16(3):483-516. doi: 10.1177/1745691620952789. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
9
The Gender Gap: Who Is (and Is Not) Included on Graduate-Level Syllabi in Social/Personality Psychology.性别差距:社会/人格心理学研究生课程大纲中包括(和不包括)哪些人。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Jun;47(6):863-872. doi: 10.1177/0146167220947326. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
10
Gender Equity Considerations for Tenure and Promotion during COVID-19.新冠疫情期间职称评定和晋升中的性别平等考量
Can Rev Sociol. 2020 Aug;57(3):502-515. doi: 10.1111/cars.12295. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

在以本科生为主的院校中支持女性科研:美国国家科学基金会“推进机构转型奖”的经验

Supporting women's research in predominantly undergraduate institutions: Experiences with a National Science Foundation ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Award.

作者信息

Rabinowitz Vita C, Valian Virginia

机构信息

Hunter College and the Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 16;13:817269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817269. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.817269
PMID:36248569
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9559813/
Abstract

This paper describes the Gender Equity Project (GEP) at Hunter College of the City University of New York (CUNY), funded by the U. S. NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Award (ITA) program. ADVANCE supports system-level strategies to promote gender equity in the social and natural sciences, but has supported very few teaching-intensive institutions. Hunter College is a teaching-intensive institution in which research productivity among faculty is highly valued and counts toward tenure and promotion. We created the GEP to address the particular challenges that faculty, especially White women and faculty of color, face in maintaining research programs and advancing in their careers at teaching-intensive institutions. During the course of the ADVANCE award, its centerpiece was the Sponsorship Program, a multifaceted paid mentorship/sponsorship program that paired each participant with a successful scholar in her discipline. It offered extensive professional development opportunities, including interactive workshops and internal grants to support research. The GEP helped change key policies and practices by ensuring that all faculty were treated fairly in areas like provision of research start-up funds and access to guidance on how to prepare for tenure and promotion. Qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests that participation in the Sponsorship Program boosted research productivity and advanced the careers of many of the women who participated; the Program was highly rated by all participants. Some of the policy and practice changes that the GEP helped bring about were sustained at Hunter beyond the award period and some were adopted and disseminated by the central office of CUNY. However, we were not able to sustain the relatively expensive (but cost-effective) Sponsorship Program. We share the lessons we learned, including that creating a diverse, successful social and natural scientific workforce requires sustained support of female faculty employed at teaching-intensive colleges. We acknowledge the difficulties of sustaining gains, and offer ideas about how to make the case for gender equity when women seem to be doing "well enough." We underscore the imperative of building support for women's research in teaching-intensive institutions, where most women scientists are employed, and well over 90% of all college students-a disproportionate percentage of whom are female, minoritized, or both-are educated.

摘要

本文介绍了纽约城市大学(CUNY)亨特学院的性别平等项目(GEP),该项目由美国国家科学基金会(NSF)的推进机构转型奖(ITA)计划资助。推进计划支持在社会科学和自然科学领域促进性别平等的系统层面战略,但对教学型机构的支持非常少。亨特学院是一所教学型机构,教师的研究生产力受到高度重视,并在任期和晋升中予以考量。我们创建性别平等项目是为了应对教师,尤其是白人女性和有色人种教师,在教学型机构维持研究项目并在职业生涯中取得进展时所面临的特殊挑战。在推进奖项目实施过程中,其核心是赞助计划,这是一个多方面的有偿指导/赞助项目,将每位参与者与本学科的一位成功学者配对。该计划提供了广泛的职业发展机会,包括互动研讨会和内部资助以支持研究。性别平等项目通过确保在提供研究启动资金以及获取关于如何为任期和晋升做准备的指导等方面公平对待所有教师,帮助改变了关键政策和做法。定性和定量证据表明,参与赞助计划提高了研究生产力,并推动了许多参与其中的女性的职业发展;该计划得到了所有参与者的高度评价。性别平等项目促成的一些政策和实践变革在亨特学院在奖励期结束后得以持续,还有一些被纽约城市大学中央办公室采纳并推广。然而,我们无法维持相对昂贵(但具有成本效益)的赞助计划。我们分享我们学到的经验教训,包括创建一支多元化、成功的社会科学和自然科学工作队伍需要对教学型学院聘用的女性教师给予持续支持。我们认识到维持成果的困难,并就当女性似乎“做得足够好”时如何为性别平等进行论证提供思路。我们强调在教学型机构为女性研究建立支持的紧迫性,大多数女性科学家受雇于这些机构,并且超过90%的大学生——其中女性、少数族裔或两者兼有的比例过高——在这些机构接受教育。