多利益相关方参与是共同设计心脏骤停护理的核心。 - Suppr | 超能文献

文献检索
文档翻译
深度研究
学术资讯

Zotero 插件

邀请有礼
套餐&价格
历史记录

应用&插件

Zotero 插件浏览器插件 Mac 客户端 Windows 客户端微信小程序

定价

高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包

服务

文献检索文档翻译深度研究 API 文档 MCP 服务

关于我们

关于 Suppr 公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款

关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究

粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多利益相关方参与是共同设计心脏骤停护理的核心。 - Suppr | 超能文献

Diverse stakeholder engagement at the heart of co-designing cardiac arrest care.

作者信息

Paratz Elizabeth D, Page Gregory, Maris Jessica, Orchard Jessica, Semsarian Christopher, La Gerche Andre

机构信息

Clinical Research Domain, Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

National Centre for Sports Cardiology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, Australia.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Jan 20;3(2):213-217. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.12.006. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.hroo.2021.12.006

原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9043393/

Abstract

摘要

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9312/9043393/d8d0941d677c/gr3.jpg

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9312/9043393/c3305db811e3/gr1.jpg

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9312/9043393/227bca7a7163/gr2.jpg

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9312/9043393/d8d0941d677c/gr3.jpg

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9312/9043393/c3305db811e3/gr1.jpg

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9312/9043393/227bca7a7163/gr2.jpg

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9312/9043393/d8d0941d677c/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1

Diverse stakeholder engagement at the heart of co-designing cardiac arrest care.多利益相关方参与是共同设计心脏骤停护理的核心。

Heart Rhythm O2. 2022 Jan 20;3(2):213-217. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.12.006. eCollection 2022 Apr.

2

Stakeholder engagement in research on quality of life and palliative care for brain tumors: a qualitative analysis of #BTSM and #HPM tweet chats.利益相关者参与脑肿瘤患者生活质量与姑息治疗的研究：对#BTSM和#HPM推文聊天记录的定性分析

Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jul 29;7(6):676-684. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa043. eCollection 2020 Dec.

3

Stakeholder engagement in the study and management of invasive alien species.利益相关者参与入侵外来物种的研究和管理。

J Environ Manage. 2019 Jan 1;229:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.044. Epub 2018 Aug 1.

4

A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.一项反映社区利益相关者不同观点的肺癌研究议程：SEED方法的过程与成果

Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y. eCollection 2019.

5

Patient engagement in the process of planning and designing outpatient care improvements at the Veterans Administration Health-care System: findings from an online expert panel.患者参与退伍军人管理局医疗系统门诊护理改善计划与设计过程：在线专家小组的调查结果

Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):130-145. doi: 10.1111/hex.12444. Epub 2016 Feb 23.

6

Psychosocial nursing therapy following sudden cardiac arrest: impact on two-year survival.

Nurs Res. 2001 Mar-Apr;50(2):68-76. doi: 10.1097/00006199-200103000-00002.

7

Domains of nursing intervention after sudden cardiac arrest and automatic internal cardioverter defibrillator implantation.心脏骤停和植入自动体内除颤器后的护理干预领域。

Heart Lung. 2000 Mar-Apr;29(2):79-86.

8

Effective stakeholder engagement: design and implementation of a clinical trial (SWOG S1415CD) to improve cancer care.有效的利益相关者参与：临床试验（SWOG S1415CD）的设计和实施，以改善癌症护理。

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 11;19(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0764-2.

9

Methods guiding stakeholder engagement in planning a pragmatic study on changing stroke systems of care.指导利益相关者参与规划一项关于改变卒中护理系统的务实研究的方法。

J Clin Transl Sci. 2017 Apr;1(2):121-128. doi: 10.1017/cts.2016.26. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

10

Sudden Cardiac Arrest Survivorship: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.心脏性骤停幸存者：美国心脏协会的科学声明。

Circulation. 2020 Mar 24;141(12):e654-e685. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000747. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

本文引用的文献

1

Commentary: Community Knowledge for Equity in Healthcare.评论：医疗保健公平的社区知识。

Healthc Policy. 2021 Aug;17(1):25-29. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2021.26581.

2

Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.

3

Aussie KIDS SAVE LIVES: A position statement from the Australian Resuscitation Council and supported by stakeholders.

澳大利亚儿童拯救生命：澳大利亚复苏委员会的立场声明，并得到利益相关者的支持。

Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Oct;33(5):944-946. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13840. Epub 2021 Aug 13.

4

Follow-up care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A pilot study of survivors and families' experiences and recommendations.院外心脏骤停后的随访护理：一项关于幸存者及其家属经历与建议的试点研究。

Resusc Plus. 2021 Jul 29;7:100154. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100154. eCollection 2021 Sep.

5

Partnering with survivors & families to determine research priorities for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.与幸存者及家属合作确定成人院外心脏骤停的研究重点：一项詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定合作项目

Resusc Plus. 2021 Jul 7;7:100148. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100148. eCollection 2021 Sep.

6

Patient partners' perspectives of meaningful engagement in synthesis reviews: A patient-oriented rapid review.患者伙伴对综合研究中具有意义的参与的看法：一项面向患者的快速综述。

Health Expect. 2021 Aug;24(4):1056-1071. doi: 10.1111/hex.13279. Epub 2021 May 28.

7

The End Unexplained Cardiac Death (EndUCD) Registry for Young Australian Sudden Cardiac Arrest.澳大利亚青年心源性猝死后不明原因心脏死亡（EndUCD）注册研究。

Heart Lung Circ. 2021 May;30(5):714-720. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.09.937. Epub 2020 Nov 13.

8

Mind the gap: Knowledge deficits in evaluating young sudden cardiac death.注意间隙：评估青年心源性猝死中的知识缺陷。

Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2208-2214. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.029. Epub 2020 Jul 25.

9

Patient engagement at the heart of all European Society of Cardiology activities.患者参与是欧洲心脏病学会所有活动的核心。

Cardiovasc Res. 2019 Aug 1;115(10):e99-e101. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvz116.

10

ESC involving patients: purpose & priorities.

Eur Heart J. 2018 Nov 1;39(41):3681. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy644.