Lower-Hoppe Leeann M, Kim Amy Chan Hyung, Brgoch Shea M, Zwolski Christin M, Schmitt Laura, Paponetti Matthew K, Quatman-Yates Catherine C
Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Department of Sport Management, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Apr 12;4:809946. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.809946. eCollection 2022.
Physical literacy has quickly gained global attention as a holistic approach to combat physical inactivity and obesity. However, research silos may limit the growth and application of the physical literacy paradigm for effective physical activity promotion. The purpose of this study was to measure the underlying network structure of scholars publishing on physical literacy (focusing on empirical research) through co-authorship analysis.
Data collection resulted in 1,070 documents related to physical literacy retrieved. A total of 198 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the full network, with authors operationalized as actors in the network. A total of 75 empirical studies were included in the sub-network for critical appraisal and further analysis. Social network analysis was then conducted at the macro- and component-level, using quantification and visualization techniques.
Results revealed a collaborative, yet fragmented physical literacy network with sub-groups representing substantive and geographically diverse scholars. The majority of scholarship lacked empirical evidence, suggesting a research-practice gap.
Recommendations for advancing physical literacy research and practice include strategic collaborations that transcend geographic and disciplinary boundaries, cooperative efforts across scholars and practitioners, and productive discourse through professional avenues to progress knowledge generation, dispersion, and application.
身体素养作为一种应对身体活动不足和肥胖问题的整体方法,迅速获得了全球关注。然而,研究孤岛可能会限制身体素养范式在促进有效身体活动方面的发展和应用。本研究的目的是通过合著分析来衡量发表关于身体素养(侧重于实证研究)的学者的潜在网络结构。
数据收集共检索到1070份与身体素养相关的文献。共有198篇文章符合纳入标准并被纳入完整网络,作者被视为网络中的行动者。共有75项实证研究被纳入子网络进行批判性评估和进一步分析。然后使用量化和可视化技术在宏观和组件层面进行社会网络分析。
结果显示,身体素养网络具有协作性,但也存在碎片化,其中的子群体代表了不同领域和地域的学者。大多数研究缺乏实证证据,这表明存在研究与实践的差距。
推进身体素养研究和实践的建议包括超越地理和学科界限的战略合作、学者与从业者之间的合作努力,以及通过专业渠道进行富有成效的讨论,以促进知识的生成、传播和应用。