NORCE Health, NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS, Bergen, Norway
Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 2;12(5):e054046. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054046.
To describe how an intervention to limit direct attendance in an emergency primary healthcare service affected the contacts to the clinic and the level of care given, and which factors were associated with a change from direct attendance to telephone contact.
Observational study.
Seven Norwegian emergency primary healthcare services. The telephone triage operators are primarily registered nurses.
Registered patient contacts to the services during 2007-2019.
In 2013, one of the seven services made an intervention to limit direct attendances to the emergency primary healthcare clinic. Through an advertisement in a local newspaper, the public was encouraged to call in advance. Patients who still attended directly, were encouraged to call in advance next time.
We compared the proportions of direct attendance and telephone contact, and of consultation by a general practitioner and telephone consultation by an operator, before and after the intervention. We also compared the proportions of direct attendance regarding gender, age group, time of day and urgency level. Descriptive analyses and log binomial regression analyses were applied.
There were 1 105 019 contacts to the seven services during the study period. The average proportion of direct attendance decreased from 68.7% (95% CI 68.4% to 68.9%) to 23.4% (95% CI 23.2% to 23.6%) in the service that carried out the intervention. Telephone consultation by an operator increased from 11.7% (95% CI 11.5% to 11.8%) to 29.2% (95% CI 28.9% to 29.5%) and medical consultation by a general practitioner decreased from 78.3% (95% CI 78.1% to 78.5%) to 57.0% (95% CI 56.7% to 57.3%). The youngest and the oldest age group and women had the largest decrease in direct attendance, by -81%, -74% and -71%, respectively.
The intervention influenced how the public contacted the service. Information campaigns on how to contact healthcare services should be implemented on a regular basis.
描述限制急诊初级保健服务直接就诊的干预措施如何影响与诊所的接触以及所提供的护理水平,以及哪些因素与从直接就诊转为电话联系相关。
观察性研究。
挪威的七个急诊初级保健服务。电话分诊员主要是注册护士。
2007 年至 2019 年期间注册的患者与服务的联系。
2013 年,其中一个服务采取了限制直接到急诊初级保健诊所就诊的干预措施。通过当地报纸上的一则广告,鼓励公众提前打电话。仍直接就诊的患者被鼓励下次提前打电话。
我们比较了干预前后直接就诊和电话联系的比例,以及由全科医生就诊和由操作员进行电话咨询的比例。我们还比较了直接就诊的比例,按性别、年龄组、一天中的时间和紧急程度进行分组。应用描述性分析和对数二项式回归分析。
在研究期间,七个服务共接待了 1105019 名患者。在实施干预的服务中,直接就诊的平均比例从 68.7%(95%置信区间 68.4%至 68.9%)下降到 23.4%(95%置信区间 23.2%至 23.6%)。由操作员进行的电话咨询从 11.7%(95%置信区间 11.5%至 11.8%)增加到 29.2%(95%置信区间 28.9%至 29.5%),而由全科医生就诊的比例从 78.3%(95%置信区间 78.1%至 78.5%)下降到 57.0%(95%置信区间 56.7%至 57.3%)。最年轻和最年长的年龄组以及女性的直接就诊比例下降最大,分别为-81%、-74%和-71%。
干预措施影响了公众与服务的联系方式。应定期开展有关如何联系医疗保健服务的宣传活动。