College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing/School of Nursing and Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Gosford, NSW, Australia.
School of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedicine, University of the Sunshine Coast, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Sep;31(9):1241-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
Frailty assessment is recommended for patients with heart failure. Despite the availability of instruments to assess frailty, there are no clear recommendations regarding the optimal instrument to use in a heart failure context. This ambiguity combined with a lack of education and resources, often leads clinicians to rely on subjective estimates of frailty, such as 'the end-of-the-bed' or 'eyeball' test.
To examine the association between clinician-estimated frailty and formal frailty assessment in adults with heart failure.
Cross-sectional analysis of the FRAilty MEasurement in Heart Failure (FRAME-HF) study.
(1) Adults aged ≥18 years in the outpatient heart failure clinic and cardiology ward; (2) and cardiovascular clinicians (nurses, physicians, and allied-health professionals). Following participant recruitment, cardiovascular clinicians were asked to rate the participant's frailty status based on their routine clinical assessment as either: frail, pre-frail, or non-frail, which was then compared to a formal frailty assessment using a modified version of the Frailty Phenotype. The association between clinician-estimated frailty and formal frailty assessment were examined using a weighted Kappa statistic and Spearman's correlation coefficient.
A total of 75 patients and 39 clinicians were recruited, producing 194 paired frailty assessments. Mean age of the patients was 54 (±13) years. Correlation of pooled clinician-estimated frailty to formal frailty was fair (0.52, p=0.00). Correlation was highest between allied-health estimated frailty and formal frailty (0.70, p=0.00). Agreement between pooled clinician-estimated frailty and formal frailty was fair (0.33) and was highest between allied health-estimated frailty and formal frailty (0.45).
Subjective clinician-estimated frailty is not a reliable replacement for formal frailty assessment in adults with heart failure, underscoring the need for assessment using a valid and reliable instrument.
衰弱评估被推荐用于心力衰竭患者。尽管有评估衰弱的工具,但在心力衰竭的背景下,没有明确的建议使用哪种最佳工具。这种模糊性加上缺乏教育和资源,往往导致临床医生依赖于对衰弱的主观估计,如“床尾”或“目测”测试。
检查心力衰竭成人中临床医生估计的衰弱与正式衰弱评估之间的关联。
对衰弱测量在心力衰竭中的研究(FRAME-HF)的横断面分析。
(1)门诊心力衰竭诊所和心脏病病房中年龄≥18 岁的成年人;(2)心血管临床医生(护士、医生和联合健康专业人员)。在招募参与者后,心血管临床医生根据他们的常规临床评估,将参与者的衰弱状况评为虚弱、衰弱前期或非虚弱,并将其与使用衰弱表型的修改版进行的正式衰弱评估进行比较。使用加权 Kappa 统计和斯皮尔曼相关系数检查临床医生估计的衰弱与正式衰弱评估之间的关联。
共招募了 75 名患者和 39 名临床医生,共进行了 194 次配对衰弱评估。患者的平均年龄为 54(±13)岁。汇总的临床医生估计的衰弱与正式衰弱的相关性为中等(0.52,p=0.00)。联合健康评估的衰弱与正式衰弱的相关性最高(0.70,p=0.00)。汇总的临床医生估计的衰弱与正式衰弱的一致性为中等(0.33),联合健康评估的衰弱与正式衰弱的一致性最高(0.45)。
主观的临床医生估计的衰弱并不可靠地替代心力衰竭成人的正式衰弱评估,这突出了使用有效和可靠的工具进行评估的必要性。