• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经导管主动脉瓣置换术对九十岁以上患者是否无效?

Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Futile in Patients Over Ninety Years of Age?

作者信息

Bernard Jérémy, St-Louis Roxanne, Robichaud Mathieu, Kalavrouziotis Dimitri, Dumont Éric, Paradis Jean-Michel, Babaki Shervin, Rodés-Cabau Josep, Mohammadi Siamak

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute), Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec (Université Laval/Quebec Heart and Lung Institute), Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2023 Aug 9;5(10):784-791. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.08.001. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjco.2023.08.001
PMID:37876887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10591129/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) indices are not well described after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients aged ≥ 90 years.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of TAVR among nonagenarian patients between 2008 and 2020. The survival of TAVR patients among nonagenarians was compared to the provincial estimated survival for an age- and sex-matched general population. QoL was assessed up to 1 year postintervention, using standardized questionnaires.

RESULTS

During the study period, n = 268 patients aged ≥ 90 years were evaluated for severe aortic stenosis. TAVR was performed in n = 171 (48% female; median [IQR] Rockwood Clinical Frailty Scale score: 4 [3-4]); n = 84 underwent medical therapy; and n = 13 underwent surgical aortic valve replacement. Survival was significantly better following TAVR, compared to that after MT (adjusted hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.99 [1.37-2.88], < 0.001). TAVR patients demonstrated a survival advantage compared with the general population, with an estimated relative mortality of 0.86 (0.75-0.87). TAVR patients showed sustained improvements in functional status and QoL up to 1 year compared to baseline (all < 0.05): the 6-minute walk test results improved from 192 to 252 m; the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score improved from 64 to 81; the Duke Activity Status Index score improved from 13 to 16; and the health state scale result of the Euro Quality of life - 5 Dimensions improved from 63% to 74%.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonagenarians undergoing TAVR experience a slightly better survival rate, compared to that of an age- and sex-matched general population, and they have significant improvements in functional status and several QoL indices following the procedure.

摘要

背景

≥90岁患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的临床结局和生活质量(QoL)指标尚未得到充分描述。

方法

我们对2008年至2020年间非agenarian患者的TAVR进行了一项回顾性队列研究。将非agenarian患者中TAVR患者的生存率与省级年龄和性别匹配的普通人群的估计生存率进行比较。使用标准化问卷在干预后长达1年的时间内评估QoL。

结果

在研究期间,对n = 268名≥90岁的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者进行了评估。171名患者接受了TAVR(48%为女性;中位[IQR]Rockwood临床衰弱量表评分:4[3 - 4]);84名患者接受了药物治疗;13名患者接受了外科主动脉瓣置换术。与药物治疗后相比,TAVR后的生存率显著更高(调整后的风险比[95%CI]:1.99[1.37 - 2.88],<0.001)。与普通人群相比,TAVR患者显示出生存优势,估计相对死亡率为0.86(0.75 - 0.87)。与基线相比,TAVR患者在长达1年的时间内功能状态和QoL持续改善(均<0.05):6分钟步行试验结果从192米提高到252米;堪萨斯城心肌病问卷评分从64提高到81;杜克活动状态指数评分从13提高到16;欧洲生活质量-5维度的健康状态量表结果从63%提高到74%。

结论

与年龄和性别匹配的普通人群相比,接受TAVR的非agenarian患者的生存率略高,并且术后功能状态和多个QoL指标有显著改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/ac5e7e6b77ef/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/5b41e06465cb/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/f06c1f87b8e9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/2aa4557605ee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/ac5e7e6b77ef/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/5b41e06465cb/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/f06c1f87b8e9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/2aa4557605ee/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05c3/10591129/ac5e7e6b77ef/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Futile in Patients Over Ninety Years of Age?经导管主动脉瓣置换术对九十岁以上患者是否无效?
CJC Open. 2023 Aug 9;5(10):784-791. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2023.08.001. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Quality of Life Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上患者中的生活质量结局。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Oct;32(10):375-379. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00027.
3
Health Status Benefits of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the PARTNER 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中度外科手术风险严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的健康状况获益:PARTNER 2 随机临床试验结果。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):837-845. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2039.
4
Effect of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Valve Implantation on Health Status in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the PARTNER S3i Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术对中危外科手术风险严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者健康状况的影响:PARTNER S3i 试验结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 25;11(12):1188-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.032. Epub 2018 May 30.
5
Health status after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients at extreme surgical risk: results from the CoreValve U.S. trial.手术风险极高的患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的健康状况:美国CoreValve试验结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Feb;8(2):315-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.08.016.
6
Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in an Unselected Population: A Report From the STS/ACC Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在未选择人群中的生活质量结局:STS/ACC 经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究的报告。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;2(4):409-416. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.5302.
7
The impact of frailty status on clinical and functional outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians with severe aortic stenosis.衰弱状态对患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄的非agenarians经导管主动脉瓣置换术后临床和功能结局的影响。 注:这里“nonagenarians”翻译为“九旬老人”更合适,整句译文:衰弱状态对患有严重主动脉瓣狭窄的九旬老人经导管主动脉瓣置换术后临床和功能结局的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Nov 15;90(6):1000-1006. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27083. Epub 2017 May 2.
8
Should Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Be Performed in Nonagenarians?: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.百岁老人是否应接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术?来自美国胸外科医师协会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究的见解。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 29;67(12):1387-1395. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.01.055.
9
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis can improve long-term survival of nonagenarians as compared to an age- and sex-matched general population.经导管主动脉瓣置换术可改善 90 岁以上严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的长期生存率,优于年龄和性别匹配的一般人群。
J Cardiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.07.014. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
10
Health-related quality of life after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: results from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) Trial (Cohort A).高危重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的健康相关生活质量:PARTNER(经导管主动脉瓣置入术)试验(队列 A)的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 7;60(6):548-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.075. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinician Estimates of Frailty Compared to Formal Frailty Assessment in Adults With Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.临床医生对心力衰竭成人虚弱程度的估计与正式虚弱评估的比较:一项横断面分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2022 Sep;31(9):1241-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.04.003. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
2
Impact of Frailty and Prefrailty on Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.衰弱和衰弱前期对经导管或手术主动脉瓣置换术结局的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan;15(1):e011375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011375. Epub 2022 Jan 18.
3
TAVR in nonagenarians: An analysis investigating safety, efficacy, symptomatic improvement, and long-term survival.
经导管主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上患者中的应用:安全性、疗效、症状改善和长期生存的分析研究。
J Cardiol. 2021 Jul;78(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.01.016. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
4
2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2020美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会瓣膜性心脏病患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南联合委员会报告
Circulation. 2021 Feb 2;143(5):e72-e227. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
5
A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale.临床虚弱量表的范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7.
6
Quality of Life Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上患者中的生活质量结局。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Oct;32(10):375-379. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00027.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上高龄患者中的临床疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Feb 24;2019:5819232. doi: 10.1155/2019/5819232. eCollection 2019.
8
Outcomes in nonagenarians undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a nationwide analysis.90 岁以上患者行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的结局:一项全国性分析。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Apr 17;15(17):1489-1496. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00647.
9
Temporal Trends and Clinical Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians.90 岁以上患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的时间趋势和临床转归。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013685. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013685. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Comparison of Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients Aged >90 Years Versus <90 Years.比较>90 岁与<90 岁患者经导管主动脉瓣植入术的结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;124(7):1085-1090. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.06.026. Epub 2019 Jul 15.