• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

喉罩全麻下钬激光碎石术中不同肺泡复张手法的效果。

The efficacy of different alveolar recruitment maneuvers in holmium laser lithotripsy surgery under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital, 33 Mashi Road, Wenjiang District, Chengdu, 611130, China.

Department of Anesthesiology, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, 610083, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 2;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01664-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12871-022-01664-y
PMID:35501676
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9063066/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARMs) is an important part of lung-protective ventilation strategies (LPVSs), but the optimal duration and interval Remain unclear.

METHODS

Patients:252 patients who underwent holmium laser lithotripsy surgery and meet inclusion criteria were included and randomized into three groups based on the duration and frequency of ARMs (Regular, one 30 s ARM (RARMs); Improved and intermittent, three 10s ARMs (IARMs); and Control (C), no ARMs).

INTERVENTIONS

Groups R and I received ARMs at 20 cmH2O pressures every 30 min. All patients received the same anesthesia and mechanical ventilation.

MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes included heart rate and mean arterial pressure changes during ARMs and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within the first 7 postoperative days.

MAIN RESULTS

Incidences of PPCs in groups R(7.1%) and I (5.0%)were slightly lower than those in group C (8.9%).This indicated the potential to reduce lung injury. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure fluctuations during ARMs were significantly higher in groups R and I than in group C (P < 0.01). The rate of blood pressure decrease was significantly higher in group R than in group I (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

IARMs can reduce cycle fluctuations than RARMs in patients Undergoing holmium laser lithotripsy surgery with laryngeal mask general anesthesia. Low tidal volume ventilation and low PEEP combined with ARM did not significantly reduce the incidence of PPCs in healthy lung patients, but tended to reduce lung injury.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry. ( ChiCTR2000030815 ,15/03/2020). This study was approved by the ethics committee of Chengdu Fifth People's Hospital with approval number(2020-005(Study)-1).

摘要

背景

肺泡复张手法(ARMs)是肺保护性通气策略(LPVSs)的重要组成部分,但最佳持续时间和间隔仍不清楚。

方法

患者:252 名接受钬激光碎石术且符合纳入标准的患者,根据 ARMs 的持续时间和频率分为三组:常规组,1 次 30s ARMs(RARMs);改良组和间断组,3 次 10s ARMs(IARMs);对照组(C 组),不进行 ARMs。

干预

R 组和 I 组在 20cmH2O 压力下每 30min 进行 ARMs。所有患者均接受相同的麻醉和机械通气。

测量

结果包括 ARMs 期间的心率和平均动脉压变化以及术后 7 天内的肺部并发症(PPCs)。

主要结果

R 组(7.1%)和 I 组(5.0%)的 PPCs 发生率略低于 C 组(8.9%),这表明有降低肺损伤的可能。R 组和 I 组 ARMs 期间的心率和平均动脉压波动明显高于 C 组(P<0.01)。R 组血压下降率明显高于 I 组(P<0.01)。

结论

喉罩全身麻醉下接受钬激光碎石术的患者,IARMs 可减少循环波动,优于 RARMs。低潮气量通气和低 PEEP 联合 ARM 并未显著降低健康肺患者 PPCs 的发生率,但有降低肺损伤的趋势。

试验注册

本研究在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2000030815,15/03/2020)。本研究经成都市第五人民医院伦理委员会批准,批准号(2020-005(研究)-1)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b132/9063066/cac3c1ccd459/12871_2022_1664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b132/9063066/094e046f6018/12871_2022_1664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b132/9063066/cac3c1ccd459/12871_2022_1664_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b132/9063066/094e046f6018/12871_2022_1664_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b132/9063066/cac3c1ccd459/12871_2022_1664_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The efficacy of different alveolar recruitment maneuvers in holmium laser lithotripsy surgery under general anesthesia using a laryngeal mask.喉罩全麻下钬激光碎石术中不同肺泡复张手法的效果。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 2;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01664-y.
2
Protective intraoperative ventilation with higher versus lower levels of positive end-expiratory pressure in obese patients (PROBESE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.肥胖患者术中采用较高与较低呼气末正压水平进行保护性通气(PROBESE):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Apr 28;18(1):202. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1929-0.
3
Effect of Intraoperative High Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With Recruitment Maneuvers vs Low PEEP on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Obese Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.术中高呼气末正压(PEEP)联合复张手法与低 PEEP 对肥胖患者术后肺部并发症的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 18;321(23):2292-2305. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.7505.
4
Effects of intraoperative individualized PEEP on postoperative atelectasis in obese patients: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial.术中个体化呼气末正压通气对肥胖患者术后肺不张的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jul 6;21(1):618. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04565-y.
5
Intraoperative mechanical ventilation practice in thoracic surgery patients and its association with postoperative pulmonary complications: results of a multicenter prospective observational study.胸外科患者术中机械通气实践及其与术后肺部并发症的关系:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究的结果。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jul 22;20(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01098-4.
6
Comparison of low and high inspiratory oxygen fraction added to lung-protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.低和高吸气氧分数与肺保护性通气对腹部手术后肺部并发症的影响比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Dec;67:110009. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110009. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
7
Effects of an Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver During Lung Protective Ventilation on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopy.肺保护性通气中肺泡复张手法对老年腹腔镜手术患者术后肺部并发症的影响。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Aug 24;15:1461-1469. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S264987. eCollection 2020.
8
Effects of intraoperative lung-protective ventilation on clinical outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.术中肺保护性通气对创伤性脑损伤患者临床结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Jun 28;21(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01402-w.
9
Alveolar recruitment maneuvers under general anesthesia: a systematic review of the literature.全身麻醉下的肺泡复张手法:文献系统综述
Respir Care. 2015 Apr;60(4):609-20. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03488. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
10
Effects of irrigation fluid temperature during flexible ureteroscopic holmium laser lithotripsy on postoperative fever and shivering: a randomized controlled trial.输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术中不同灌流液温度对术后发热寒战的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Urol. 2021 Apr 27;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12894-021-00841-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of visual lung recruitment manoeuvres guided by trans-oesophageal lung ultrasound on atelectasis after thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomised, single-blind, prospective study.经食管超声引导的视觉肺复张手法对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后肺不张的影响:一项随机、单盲、前瞻性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 28;24(1):388. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02777-2.
2
The effects of laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube on atelectasis in patients undergoing general anesthesia assessed by lung ultrasound: A protocol for a prospective, randomized controlled trial.喉罩与气管导管对全麻患者肺不张影响的超声评估:一项前瞻性随机对照试验方案。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273410. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Lung protective ventilation strategy to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A randomized double blinded clinical trial.肺保护性通气策略对降低膀胱癌患者行机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术后肺部并发症(PPCs)的影响:一项随机、双盲临床试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2021 Aug;71:110156. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110156. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Protective Ventilation Strategies for Moderate and Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Network Meta-Analysis.保护性通气策略对中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效比较。一项网状荟萃分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jun 1;203(11):1366-1377. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202008-3039OC.
3
Effects of an Alveolar Recruitment Maneuver During Lung Protective Ventilation on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Elderly Patients Undergoing Laparoscopy.肺保护性通气中肺泡复张手法对老年腹腔镜手术患者术后肺部并发症的影响。
Clin Interv Aging. 2020 Aug 24;15:1461-1469. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S264987. eCollection 2020.
4
Low-pressure pulmonary recruitment maneuver: equal to or worse than moderate-pressure pulmonary recruitment maneuver in preventing postlaparoscopic shoulder pain? A randomized controlled trial of 72 patients.低压肺复张手法:在预防腹腔镜术后肩部疼痛方面是否等同于或劣于中压肺复张手法?一项针对72例患者的随机对照试验。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020 Sep;15(3):519-525. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.89831. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
5
Comparison of low and high inspiratory oxygen fraction added to lung-protective ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.低和高吸气氧分数与肺保护性通气对腹部手术后肺部并发症的影响比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Clin Anesth. 2020 Dec;67:110009. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110009. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
Effect of the "Recruitment" Maneuver on Respiratory Mechanics in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Surgery.“招募”手法对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术呼吸力学的影响。
Obes Surg. 2020 Jul;30(7):2684-2692. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04551-y.
7
Recruitment manoeuvres for adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人急性呼吸窘迫综合征机械通气患者的复苏策略:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.10.033. Epub 2018 Nov 3.
8
Effects of volume-controlled equal ratio ventilation with recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.容量控制型等容通气联合肺复张及呼气末正压通气在腹腔镜袖状胃切除术中的应用:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2018 Aug 16;48(4):768-776. doi: 10.3906/sag-1712-12.
9
Perianesthetic Management of Laparoscopic Kidney Surgery.腹腔镜肾脏手术的围麻醉期管理
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Jan 18;19(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0757-4.
10
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications, Early Mortality, and Hospital Stay Following Noncardiothoracic Surgery: A Multicenter Study by the Perioperative Research Network Investigators.非心胸外科手术后的肺部并发症、早期死亡率及住院时间:围手术期研究网络调查员的多中心研究
JAMA Surg. 2017 Feb 1;152(2):157-166. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4065.