Suppr超能文献

COPD 患者从三联疗法转为双联支气管扩张治疗的影响:DACCORD“真实世界”研究。

Impact of switching from triple therapy to dual bronchodilation in COPD: the DACCORD 'real world' study.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Giessen and Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), 35043, Marburg, Germany.

Facharztforum Fürth, 90762, Fürth, Germany.

出版信息

Respir Res. 2022 May 2;23(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02037-2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) guidelines recommend reserving triple therapy of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting β-agonist (LABA) and long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) for patients with exacerbations despite dual therapy. However, many patients receive triple therapy without a clear indication. For these patients, it would be useful to know whether ICS can be withdrawn.

METHODS

DACCORD was a longitudinal, non-interventional 'real-world' study in three cohorts. This manuscript describes the results of Cohort 3, which recruited patients with COPD who had received triple therapy for ≥ 6 months. Prior to entry, each patient's physician decided to continue triple therapy, or switch to a LABA/LAMA; patients were then followed for 12 months, with exacerbations and COPD Assessment Test (CAT) data recorded every 3 months. The primary endpoint was the time until COPD worsening, defined as the occurrence of a moderate/severe exacerbation or clinically relevant CAT worsening.

RESULTS

Of the 1192 patients recruited into the study, 967 completed the end-of-study visit and ≥ 2 of the three interim visits, 292 and 675 receiving LABA/LAMA and triple therapy, respectively. Most baseline demographics were similar between the two groups. A lower proportion of patients in the LABA/LAMA group had COPD worsening than with triple therapy (32.5% vs 55.7% at 12 months), with the time to worsening extended in the LABA/LAMA group (hazard ratio 2.004, p < 0.001). In addition, a significantly lower proportion of patients in the LABA/LAMA group exacerbated (18.5% vs 28.7%; p < 0.001), accompanied by a greater improvement from baseline in CAT total score. Overall, fewer patients in the LABA/LAMA group reported adverse events than in the triple therapy group (12.9% vs 15.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that in a real world setting physicians are able to identify patients who can be 'stepped down' from triple therapy to LABA/LAMA. Following step down, there was no overall decline in COPD-indeed, some patients had better outcomes.

摘要

简介

慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)指南建议,对于因双药治疗仍出现加重而需要接受三联治疗(吸入皮质激素(ICS)、长效β激动剂(LABA)和长效抗胆碱能药物(LAMA))的患者,保留三联治疗。然而,许多患者并未明确适应证便接受了三联治疗。对于这些患者,了解是否可以停用 ICS 将很有帮助。

方法

DACCORD 是一项在三个队列中进行的纵向、非干预性“真实世界”研究。本文描述了队列 3 的结果,该队列纳入了接受三联治疗≥6 个月的 COPD 患者。入组前,每位患者的医生决定继续三联治疗或转换为 LABA/LAMA;然后对患者进行 12 个月的随访,每 3 个月记录一次加重事件和 COPD 评估测试(CAT)数据。主要终点是 COPD 恶化的时间,定义为发生中重度加重或 CAT 有临床意义的恶化。

结果

在这项研究中,共纳入了 1192 例患者,其中 967 例完成了研究结束访视和≥3 次中期访视,分别有 292 例和 675 例患者接受了 LABA/LAMA 和三联治疗。两组患者的大多数基线特征相似。与三联治疗相比,LABA/LAMA 组的患者 COPD 恶化比例较低(12 个月时分别为 32.5%和 55.7%),LABA/LAMA 组的恶化时间延长(风险比 2.004,p<0.001)。此外,LABA/LAMA 组的患者恶化比例显著降低(18.5% vs 28.7%;p<0.001),同时 CAT 总分也有更大程度的改善。总体而言,LABA/LAMA 组报告不良事件的患者少于三联治疗组(12.9% vs 15.1%)。

结论

这些结果表明,在真实环境中,医生能够识别出可以从三联治疗转为 LABA/LAMA 的患者。在降级后,COPD 并没有总体恶化——实际上,一些患者的情况有所改善。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10ae/9059416/93131793260d/12931_2022_2037_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验