Pirera Edoardo, Di Raimondo Domenico, Tuttolomondo Antonino
Internal Medicine and Stroke Care Ward, Department of Promoting Health, Maternal-Infant, Excellence and Internal and Specialized Medicine (ProMISE) "G. D'Alessandro", University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 18;13(20):6199. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206199.
The interpretation of evidence on the de-escalation of triple therapy with the withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) to dual bronchodilator therapy with a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and a long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is conflicting. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ICS discontinuation from LABA-LAMA-ICS triple therapy compared to its continuation. : We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web Of Science, clinicaltrial.gov, and CENTRAL for RCTs and observational studies from inception to 22 March 2024, investigating the effect of triple therapy de-escalation with the withdrawal of ICSs to dual therapy on the risk of COPD exacerbation, pneumonia, and lung function. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024527942. : A total of 3335 studies was screened; 3 RCTs and 3 real-world non-interventional studies were identified as eligible. The analysis of the time to the first moderate or severe exacerbation showed a pooled HR of 0.96 (95% CI, 0.80-1.15; I = 77%) for ICS withdrawal compared to triple therapy continuation. The analysis according eosinophil levels showed that COPD subjects with ≥300 eosinophils/µL had a significant increase in the incidence of moderate or severe exacerbations when de-escalated to LABA/LAMA (pooled HR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.00-1.82; I: 56%). ICS withdrawal did not significantly affect the risk of mortality and pneumonia. The de-escalation of triple therapy with ICS withdrawal does not affect the main outcomes evaluated (moderate or severe exacerbations, change in trough FEV). COPD patients with high blood eosinophils (≥2% or ≥300 cells/µL) are most likely to benefit from continuing triple therapy.
对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者,三联疗法中撤掉吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)降级为长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)与长效β受体激动剂(LABA)的双联支气管扩张剂疗法,相关证据的解读存在矛盾。我们评估了与继续使用ICS相比,从LABA-LAMA-ICS三联疗法中停用ICS的疗效和安全性。:我们在PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、clinicaltrial.gov和CENTRAL数据库中检索了从数据库建立至2024年3月22日的随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性研究,以调查三联疗法通过撤掉ICS降级为双联疗法对COPD急性加重、肺炎和肺功能风险的影响。本研究已在国际前瞻性注册系统(PROSPERO)注册,注册号为CRD42024527942。:共筛选了3335项研究;确定3项RCT和3项真实世界非干预性研究符合纳入标准。对首次中度或重度急性加重时间的分析显示,与继续三联疗法相比,停用ICS的合并风险比(HR)为0.96(95%置信区间[CI],0.80-1.15;I²=77%)。根据嗜酸性粒细胞水平进行的分析表明,嗜酸性粒细胞计数≥300/µL的COPD患者在降级为LABA/LAMA治疗时,中度或重度急性加重的发生率显著增加(合并HR:1.35,95%CI:1.00-1.82;I²:56%)。停用ICS对死亡率和肺炎风险无显著影响。三联疗法撤掉ICS的降级治疗不影响所评估的主要结局(中度或重度急性加重、低谷期第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV]变化)。血液嗜酸性粒细胞水平高(≥2%或≥300个细胞/µL)的COPD患者最有可能从继续三联疗法中获益。