• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性脑卒中患者的过渡性护理——优先事项设定项目。

Transitional care for patients with acute stroke-A priority-setting project.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Neurology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1741-1752. doi: 10.1111/hex.13517. Epub 2022 May 2.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13517
PMID:35501973
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9327821/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The scope of this priority-setting process is communication and collaboration in transitional care for patients with acute stroke. Actively involving persons with stroke and their family caregivers is important both in transitional care and when setting priorities for research. Established priority-setting methods are time-consuming and require extensive resources. They are therefore not feasible in small-scale research. This article describes a pragmatic priority-setting process to identify a prioritized top 10 list of research needs regarding transitional care for patients with acute stroke.

METHODS

A pragmatic priority-setting approach inspired by the James Lind Alliance was developed. It involves establishing a user group, identifying the research needs through an online survey, analysing and checking the research needs against systematic reviews, culminating in an online prioritization of the top 10 list.

RESULTS

The process was completed in 7 months. A total of 122 patients, family caregivers, health personnel and caseworkers submitted 484 research needs, and 19 users prioritized the top 10 list. The list includes the categories 'patients and caregivers' needs and health literacy', 'health personnel's common understanding', 'information flow between health personnel and patients and caregivers', 'available interventions and follow-up of patients and caregivers', 'interaction and collaboration between health personnel and caseworkers across hospital and primary healthcare' and 'disabilities after stroke'.

CONCLUSION

This paper outlines a pragmatic approach to identifying and prioritizing users' research needs that was completed in 7 months. The top 10 list resulting from this priority setting process can guide future research relating to communication and collaboration during the transition from hospital to the community for patients with stroke.

PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Members of three stroke organizations participated in the advisory group. They gave feedback on the scope and the process, distributed the surveys and prioritized the top 10 list. Persons with stroke and their caregivers submitted research needs in the survey.

摘要

背景

本优先序设定过程的范围是急性脑卒中患者过渡期的沟通与协作。让脑卒中患者及其家属照护者积极参与过渡期护理和研究优先序设定都非常重要。既定的优先序设定方法既耗时又需要广泛的资源,因此在小规模研究中不可行。本文描述了一种实用的优先序设定过程,旨在确定急性脑卒中患者过渡期护理的前 10 项研究需求的优先排序清单。

方法

我们采用了受詹姆斯林德联盟启发的实用优先序设定方法。它包括建立用户群体,通过在线调查确定研究需求,对系统评价进行分析和检查研究需求,最终在线对前 10 项清单进行优先级排序。

结果

该过程在 7 个月内完成。共有 122 名患者、家属照护者、卫生人员和个案工作者提交了 484 项研究需求,19 名用户对前 10 项清单进行了优先级排序。该清单包括“患者和照护者的需求及健康素养”、“卫生人员的共同理解”、“卫生人员与患者和照护者之间的信息流动”、“患者和照护者的可用干预措施和随访”、“医院和初级保健之间卫生人员和个案工作者的互动与协作”和“脑卒中后的残疾”等类别。

结论

本文概述了一种实用的方法,可在 7 个月内确定和优先考虑用户的研究需求。本优先序设定过程产生的前 10 项清单可以指导未来与脑卒中患者从医院过渡到社区的沟通与协作相关的研究。

患者和公众的贡献

三个卒中组织的成员参加了顾问小组。他们对范围和过程提供了反馈,分发了调查并对前 10 项清单进行了优先级排序。脑卒中患者及其照护者在调查中提交了研究需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8084/9327821/c5708ff9ec99/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8084/9327821/de8fe02c5fbb/HEX-25--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8084/9327821/c5708ff9ec99/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8084/9327821/de8fe02c5fbb/HEX-25--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8084/9327821/c5708ff9ec99/HEX-25--g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Transitional care for patients with acute stroke-A priority-setting project.急性脑卒中患者的过渡性护理——优先事项设定项目。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1741-1752. doi: 10.1111/hex.13517. Epub 2022 May 2.
2
Needs-led research: a way of employing user involvement when devising research questions on the trust model in community home-based health care services in Norway.需求导向型研究:在挪威社区居家医疗服务信任模式研究问题设计中运用用户参与的一种方式。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 22;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00291-0.
3
Top 10 research priorities relating to life after stroke--consensus from stroke survivors, caregivers, and health professionals.中风后生活相关的十大研究重点——中风幸存者、护理人员和健康专业人员的共识
Int J Stroke. 2014 Apr;9(3):313-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00942.x. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
4
Top 10 (plus 1) research priorities for expectant families and those with children to age 24 months in Alberta, Canada: results from the Family Research Agenda Initiative Setting (FRAISE) priority setting partnership project.加拿大艾伯塔省期待生育家庭和 24 个月以下儿童的十大(加一)研究重点:来自家庭研究议程倡议设定(FRAISE)优先事项设定伙伴关系项目的结果。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 9;11(12):e047919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047919.
5
Identifying what matters most for the health of older adults in Alberta: results from a James Lind Alliance Research Priority Setting Partnership.确定艾伯塔省老年人健康最重要的因素:詹姆斯·林德联盟研究重点制定伙伴关系的结果。
CMAJ Open. 2021 May 21;9(2):E522-E528. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20190225. Print 2021 Apr-Jun.
6
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Participation in Prioritization of Research Questions in Pediatric Hospital Medicine.患者、照护者和临床医生参与儿科医院医学研究问题的优先级排序。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e229085. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.9085.
7
International research priority setting exercises in stroke: A systematic review.中风领域国际研究优先级设定活动:一项系统评价
Int J Stroke. 2023 Feb;18(2):133-143. doi: 10.1177/17474930221096935. Epub 2022 May 12.
8
Priorities of patients, caregivers and health-care professionals for health research - A systematic review.患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的健康研究优先事项 - 系统评价。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):992-1006. doi: 10.1111/hex.13090. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
9
Research priorities for liver glycogen storage disease: An international priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance.肝糖原贮积病的研究重点:与詹姆斯·林德联盟的国际优先事项确定合作项目
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2020 Mar;43(2):279-289. doi: 10.1002/jimd.12178. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
10
Hypertension management research priorities from patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers: A report from the Hypertension Canada Priority Setting Partnership Group.患者、护理人员和医疗服务提供者对高血压管理的研究重点:来自加拿大高血压优先事项设定合作组织的报告。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Nov;19(11):1063-1069. doi: 10.1111/jch.13091. Epub 2017 Sep 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Stroke patient and stakeholder engagement (SPSE): concepts, definitions, models, implementation strategies, indicators, and frameworks-a systematic scoping review.卒中患者和利益相关者参与(SPSE):概念、定义、模型、实施策略、指标和框架——系统范围界定综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;13(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02686-y.
2
Needs led research: ensuring relevant research in two PhD projects within maternity care.需求导向型研究:确保两个产科护理博士项目中的相关研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Sep 12;10(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00627-6.
3
Are physiotherapists and occupational therapists following the guidelines for discharge summary?-An analysis of the content of physiotherapists' and occupational therapists' discharge summaries and their adherence to stroke guideline recommendations.

本文引用的文献

1
The Bridge Building Model: connecting evidence-based practice, evidence-based research, public involvement and needs led research.桥梁建设模型:连接循证实践、循证研究、公众参与和需求导向研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 30;7(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00320-y.
2
Priorities of patients, caregivers and health-care professionals for health research - A systematic review.患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的健康研究优先事项 - 系统评价。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):992-1006. doi: 10.1111/hex.13090. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
3
Perceptive Dialogue for Linking Stakeholders and Units During Care Transitions - A Qualitative Study of People with Stroke, Significant Others and Healthcare Professionals in Sweden.
物理治疗师和职业治疗师是否遵循出院小结指南?-对物理治疗师和职业治疗师出院小结内容及其对中风指南建议的遵循情况的分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 3;19(9):e0308039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308039. eCollection 2024.
4
Ten Priorities for Research Addressing the Intersections of Brain Injury, Mental Health and Addictions: A Stakeholder-Driven Priority-Setting Study.解决脑损伤、心理健康和成瘾交叉问题的研究优先事项 10 项:利益相关者驱动的优先事项设定研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14136. doi: 10.1111/hex.14136.
5
Qualitative Exploration of Speech Pathologists' Experiences and Priorities for Aphasia Service Design: Initial Stage of an Experience-Based Co-Design Project to Improve Aphasia Services.定性探索言语治疗师在失语症服务设计方面的经验和重点:基于经验的共同设计项目改善失语症服务的初始阶段。
Health Expect. 2024 Jun;27(3):e14105. doi: 10.1111/hex.14105.
6
A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.患者和公众参与实证性卒中研究的范围综述。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Oct;19(9):962-972. doi: 10.1177/17474930241262638. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
7
Transitioning to home and beyond following stroke: a prospective cohort study of outcomes and needs.脑卒中后居家及转归的前瞻性队列研究:结局与需求评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10820-8.
8
Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research: a scoping review of contemporary practice.患者及公众参与北欧医疗保健研究:当代实践的范围综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Aug 30;9(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00490-x.
护理过渡期间连接利益相关者和单位的感知对话——瑞典中风患者、重要他人及医疗保健专业人员的定性研究
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Mar 25;20(1):11. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4689.
4
Reporting guideline for priority setting of health research (REPRISE).健康研究优先排序报告指南(REPRISE)。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Dec 28;19(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0889-3.
5
The James Lind Alliance process approach: scoping review.詹姆斯·林德联盟过程方法:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 30;9(8):e027473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027473.
6
Caregiver Interventions for Adults Discharged from the Hospital: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.照料者干预对出院成年人的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019 Sep;67(9):1960-1969. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16048. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
7
Long-term unmet needs after stroke: systematic review of evidence from survey studies.脑卒中后长期未满足的需求:来自调查研究的证据系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 19;9(5):e028137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028137.
8
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架:系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
From Hospital to Home to Participation: A Position Paper on Transition Planning Poststroke.从医院到家庭再到参与:脑卒中后过渡规划的立场文件
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;100(6):1162-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
10
Public involvement in health and social sciences research: A concept analysis.公众参与健康和社会科学研究:概念分析。
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1183-1190. doi: 10.1111/hex.12825. Epub 2018 Aug 29.