• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解决脑损伤、心理健康和成瘾交叉问题的研究优先事项 10 项:利益相关者驱动的优先事项设定研究。

Ten Priorities for Research Addressing the Intersections of Brain Injury, Mental Health and Addictions: A Stakeholder-Driven Priority-Setting Study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.

Institute on Aging & Lifelong Health, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14136. doi: 10.1111/hex.14136.

DOI:10.1111/hex.14136
PMID:38990165
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11238575/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to engage key stakeholders in a health research priority-setting process to identify, prioritize and produce a community-driven list of research questions addressing intersectional issues on mental health and addictions (MHA) in acquired brain injury (ABI).

METHODS

A multiphasic health research priority-setting process was co-designed and executed with community-based stakeholders, including researchers, health professionals, clinicians, service providers, representatives from brain injury associations, policy makers and people with lived experience of ABI and MHA, including patients and their family members. Stakeholders' ideas led to the generation of research questions, which were prioritized at a 1-day workshop.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine stakeholders participated in the priority-setting activity during the workshop, which resulted in a rank-ordered list of the top 10 questions for research addressing the intersections of ABI and MHA. Questions identified touched on several pressing issues (e.g., opioid crisis, homelessness), encompassed multiple subtypes of ABI (e.g., hypoxic-ischaemic, mild traumatic), and involved different domains (e.g., identification, intervention) of health research.

CONCLUSIONS

This community-driven health research priority-setting study identified and prioritized research questions addressing the intersections of ABI and MHA. Researchers and funding agencies should use this list to inform their agendas and address stakeholders' most urgent needs, fostering meaningful improvements to clinical services.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

An 11-person working group comprised of people with lived experience, service providers, researchers, healthcare professionals and other key stakeholders collaboratively developed and informed the scope, design, methodology and interpretation of this study. Over 50 community-based stakeholders contributed to the research priority-setting activity. One co-author is a person with lived experience.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在让关键利益攸关方参与一项健康研究优先事项设定过程,以确定、优先考虑并制定一份由社区驱动的研究问题清单,这些问题涉及脑损伤(ABI)相关的心理健康和成瘾(MHA)的交叉问题。

方法

与社区利益攸关方(包括研究人员、卫生专业人员、临床医生、服务提供者、脑损伤协会代表、政策制定者以及有 ABI 和 MHA 经历的人,包括患者及其家属)共同设计和执行了一个多阶段的健康研究优先事项设定过程。利益攸关方的想法促成了研究问题的产生,这些问题在为期一天的研讨会上进行了优先排序。

结果

59 名利益攸关方在研讨会上参与了优先事项设定活动,最终确定了排名前 10 的研究问题,这些问题涉及 ABI 和 MHA 交叉问题。确定的问题涉及几个紧迫的问题(例如,阿片类药物危机、无家可归),涵盖了多种 ABI 亚型(例如,缺氧缺血性、轻度创伤性),并涉及健康研究的不同领域(例如,识别、干预)。

结论

这项由社区驱动的健康研究优先事项设定研究确定并优先考虑了涉及 ABI 和 MHA 交叉问题的研究问题。研究人员和资助机构应使用此清单来为他们的议程提供信息,并解决利益攸关方最紧迫的需求,促进对临床服务的有意义的改进。

患者或公众贡献

由有生活经验的人、服务提供者、研究人员、医疗保健专业人员和其他主要利益攸关方组成的 11 人工作组共同制定并告知了本研究的范围、设计、方法和解释。超过 50 名社区利益攸关方为研究优先事项设定活动做出了贡献。一位共同作者是有生活经验的人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea60/11238575/a1b0ee58699e/HEX-27-e14136-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea60/11238575/2002770aad85/HEX-27-e14136-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea60/11238575/a1b0ee58699e/HEX-27-e14136-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea60/11238575/2002770aad85/HEX-27-e14136-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ea60/11238575/a1b0ee58699e/HEX-27-e14136-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Ten Priorities for Research Addressing the Intersections of Brain Injury, Mental Health and Addictions: A Stakeholder-Driven Priority-Setting Study.解决脑损伤、心理健康和成瘾交叉问题的研究优先事项 10 项:利益相关者驱动的优先事项设定研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14136. doi: 10.1111/hex.14136.
2
The development of a national nutrition and mental health research agenda with comparison of priorities among diverse stakeholders.制定一项国家营养与心理健康研究议程,并比较不同利益相关者的优先事项。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Mar;20(4):712-725. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016002056. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
3
Setting research priorities in tobacco control: a stakeholder engagement project.制定烟草控制研究重点:利益攸关方参与项目。
Addiction. 2017 Dec;112(12):2257-2271. doi: 10.1111/add.13940. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
4
Stakeholder involvement in health research priority setting in low income countries: the case of Zambia.利益相关者参与低收入国家卫生研究重点的确定:以赞比亚为例。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Nov 5;4:41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0121-3. eCollection 2018.
5
How should multiple myeloma research change in a patient-oriented world? Findings and lessons from the pan-Canadian myeloma priority setting partnership.在以患者为导向的世界中,多发性骨髓瘤研究应如何改变?来自泛加拿大骨髓瘤优先事项设定伙伴关系的发现与经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 29;9(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00476-9.
6
Priority topics for child and family health research in community-based paediatric health care according to caregivers and health care professionals.根据护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的意见,社区儿科医疗保健中儿童与家庭健康研究的优先主题。
Paediatr Child Health. 2023 Jan 5;28(3):158-165. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxac106. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Establishing research priorities relating to the long-term impact of TIA and minor stroke through stakeholder-centred consensus.通过以利益相关者为中心的共识确定与短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和轻度中风的长期影响相关的研究重点。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jan 25;4:2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0089-z. eCollection 2018.
8
Stakeholder identified research priorities for early intervention in psychosis.利益相关者确定了精神病早期干预的研究重点。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):2960-2970. doi: 10.1111/hex.13604. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
9
Identifying health and healthcare priorities in rural areas: A concept mapping study informed by consumers, health professionals and researchers.确定农村地区的健康和医疗保健重点:基于消费者、卫生专业人员和研究人员的概念映射研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Aug 13;22(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01163-1.
10
How countries cope with competing demands and expectations: perspectives of different stakeholders on priority setting and resource allocation for health in the era of HIV and AIDS.国家如何应对相互竞争的需求和期望:不同利益攸关方对艾滋病毒和艾滋病时代卫生重点制定和资源分配的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 11;12:1071. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1071.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators to housing and healthcare services for people experiencing homelessness with concurrent brain injury, mental health and substance use disorders: a qualitative study.患有脑损伤、精神健康问题和物质使用障碍的无家可归者获得住房和医疗服务的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;13:1643689. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1643689. eCollection 2025.
2
Making Room for Every Voice: Reimagining Person-Centred Care in the Neurosciences.为每一种声音留出空间:重塑神经科学中的以人为本的护理
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70350. doi: 10.1111/hex.70350.
3
Brain injury, mental health and substance use in homeless populations: community-generated recommendations for healthcare service delivery and research.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.探索创伤性脑损伤中健康的社会决定因素及健康差异:一项范围综述
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 23;13(5):707. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13050707.
2
Associations between posttraumatic stress and stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤后应激与中风的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Trauma Stress. 2023 Apr;36(2):259-271. doi: 10.1002/jts.22925. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
A rapid priority setting exercise combining existing, emergent evidence with stakeholder knowledge identified broad topic uncertainties.
无家可归人群中的脑损伤、心理健康与物质使用:社区提出的医疗服务提供与研究建议
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 17;25(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12835-1.
一项将现有证据、新出现的证据与利益相关者的知识相结合的快速优先级设定活动,识别出了广泛的主题不确定性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Feb;154:178-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.11.021. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Influence of psychological responses of caregiving on the perceived health of family caregivers to acute stroke survivors.照顾者心理反应对急性脑卒中幸存者家庭照顾者感知健康的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 23;101(38):e30778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030778.
5
Handling missing data in clinical research.临床研究中缺失数据的处理。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Nov;151:185-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.016. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Priority setting for Canadian Take-Home Naloxone best practice guideline development: an adapted online Delphi method.加拿大带药回家纳洛酮最佳实践指南制定的优先事项设定:一种经改编的在线德尔菲法。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Jul 2;19(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00650-4.
7
Transitional care for patients with acute stroke-A priority-setting project.急性脑卒中患者的过渡性护理——优先事项设定项目。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1741-1752. doi: 10.1111/hex.13517. Epub 2022 May 2.
8
Association of pre-admission opioid abuse and/or dependence on major complications in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients.入院前阿片类药物滥用和/或依赖与创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者主要并发症的关联。
J Clin Anesth. 2022 Aug;79:110719. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110719. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
9
A systematic review on integrated care for traumatic brain injury, mental health, and substance use.创伤性脑损伤、精神健康和物质使用的综合护理系统评价。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 3;17(3):e0264116. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264116. eCollection 2022.
10
World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022.世界卒中组织(WSO):全球卒中状况 2022 概要。
Int J Stroke. 2022 Jan;17(1):18-29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917.