• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

饮食教育对有乳腺癌或结肠癌风险增加的个体赋权的影响:一项初步研究。

Effects of diet education on empowerment for individuals who have an increased risk of developing breast or colon cancer: A pilot study.

机构信息

Division of Genetic Counseling Education, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

Division of Medical Nutrition Education, College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1138-1147. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1584. Epub 2022 May 3.

DOI:10.1002/jgc4.1584
PMID:35502599
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9790378/
Abstract

Strong evidence indicates following a healthy diet reduces cancer risk; however, the impact of diet education on empowerment on individuals with an increased cancer risk has not been evaluated. Study participants included patients who had met with a cancer genetic counselor without a history of cancer. Participants received pre- and post-diet education surveys including questions to measure empowerment and feedback for diet education in relation to cancer risk. Empowerment was measured using a ten-question survey adapted from the Genetic Counseling Outcome Scale. The diet education intervention consisted of viewing an infographic created for this study based on recommendations for diets that reduce cancer risk by the World Cancer Research Fund and American Institute for Cancer Research. Twenty-eight participants completed both surveys and reviewed the diet education intervention. There was no change in empowerment between pre- and post- diet education (mean change = -0.5; p = 0.49). Participants previously learned about the relationship between a healthy diet and cancer risk reduction from several sources including family and friends (25.0%), online (25.0%), and primary care providers (25.0%). Most participants preferred diet education to be delivered online (42.9%), followed by on paper (39.3%), and in-person delivery (17.9%). This pilot study promotes further investigation on the impact of diet or lifestyle education on individuals who have a predisposition to developing cancer. While the results demonstrated no change in empowerment because of diet education, the results established a desire for learning about a healthy diet related to cancer risk and preferences for the modes of delivering education.

摘要

有力的证据表明,健康的饮食可以降低癌症风险;然而,饮食教育对增加癌症风险个体的赋权影响尚未得到评估。研究参与者包括曾与癌症遗传咨询师会面但无癌症病史的患者。参与者接受了饮食教育前后的调查,包括衡量赋权的问题以及与癌症风险相关的饮食教育反馈。赋权是通过改编自遗传咨询结果量表的十项调查来衡量的。饮食教育干预包括观看根据世界癌症研究基金会和美国癌症研究所降低癌症风险的饮食建议制作的信息图。28 名参与者完成了两项调查并审查了饮食教育干预措施。饮食教育前后的赋权没有变化(平均变化=-0.5;p=0.49)。参与者之前从多个来源了解健康饮食与降低癌症风险之间的关系,包括家人和朋友(25.0%)、网络(25.0%)和初级保健提供者(25.0%)。大多数参与者更喜欢在线(42.9%)提供饮食教育,其次是纸质(39.3%)和面对面(17.9%)。这项试点研究促进了对饮食或生活方式教育对有癌症倾向个体的影响的进一步调查。虽然结果表明饮食教育并没有增强赋权,但结果表明人们渴望了解与癌症风险相关的健康饮食知识,并对教育模式的偏好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03da/9790378/05ab10d1b6bf/JGC4-31-1138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03da/9790378/05ab10d1b6bf/JGC4-31-1138-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03da/9790378/05ab10d1b6bf/JGC4-31-1138-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of diet education on empowerment for individuals who have an increased risk of developing breast or colon cancer: A pilot study.饮食教育对有乳腺癌或结肠癌风险增加的个体赋权的影响:一项初步研究。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Oct;31(5):1138-1147. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1584. Epub 2022 May 3.
2
The impact of cardiovascular genetic counseling on patient empowerment.心血管遗传咨询对患者赋权的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):570-577. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1050. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
3
Genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility: what do women want?乳腺癌-卵巢癌易感性的遗传咨询与检测:女性想要什么?
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):133-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.133.
4
MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing.MAGENTA(使基因检测普及化):一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较在线遗传教育和电话遗传咨询对遗传性癌症基因检测的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 2;19(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5868-x.
5
Strength of the genetic counselor: patient relationship is associated with extent of increased empowerment in patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.遗传咨询师的优势在于:与心律失常性心肌病患者的关系强弱与患者的赋权程度呈正相关。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Apr;31(2):388-397. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1499. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
6
Pre-counseling education for low literacy women at risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC): patient experiences using the Cancer Risk Education Intervention Tool (CREdIT).针对有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)风险的低文化水平女性的咨询前教育:患者使用癌症风险教育干预工具(CREdIT)的体验。
J Genet Couns. 2010 Oct;19(5):447-62. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9303-3. Epub 2010 May 19.
7
Healthy women with a family history of breast cancer: impact of a tailored genetic counseling intervention on risk perception, knowledge, and menopausal therapy decision making.有乳腺癌家族史的健康女性:定制的遗传咨询干预对风险认知、知识及绝经治疗决策的影响
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006 Sep;15(7):843-56. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2006.15.843.
8
Evaluating the experiences of individuals with personal health risks identified through expanded carrier screening.评估通过扩展携带者筛查确定的具有个人健康风险个体的体验。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Jun;31(3):598-607. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1527. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
9
Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.网页平台与现场遗传咨询师在传递外显子组测序携带者结果方面的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Mar 1;178(3):338-346. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8049.
10
Retrospective comparison of parent-reported genetics knowledge, empowerment, and familial uptake of cardiac screening between parents who received genetic counseling by a certified genetic counselor and those who did not: A single US academic medical center study.回顾性比较接受认证遗传咨询师提供的遗传咨询和未接受遗传咨询的父母在报告遗传知识、赋权和心脏筛查家族接受度方面的差异:一项美国单一学术医疗中心的研究。
J Genet Couns. 2022 Aug;31(4):965-975. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1570. Epub 2022 Mar 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Recommendations and the Risk of Breast Cancer.遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所的建议与乳腺癌风险之间的关系。
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 26;12(3):607. doi: 10.3390/nu12030607.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the 2007 WCRF/AICR score in relation to cancer-related health outcomes.关于2007年世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究学会评分与癌症相关健康结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Oncol. 2020 Mar;31(3):352-368. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
3
Operationalizing the 2018 World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) Cancer Prevention Recommendations: A Standardized Scoring System.
实施 2018 年世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所(WCRF/AICR)癌症预防建议:标准化评分系统。
Nutrients. 2019 Jul 12;11(7):1572. doi: 10.3390/nu11071572.
4
Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research 2018 Recommendations for Cancer Prevention and Risk of Colorectal Cancer.遵循世界癌症研究基金会/美国癌症研究所 2018 年癌症预防和结直肠癌风险的建议。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Sep;28(9):1469-1479. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0165. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
5
Diet assessment among men undergoing genetic counseling and genetic testing for inherited prostate cancer: Exploring a teachable moment to support diet intervention.接受遗传性前列腺癌遗传咨询和基因检测的男性的饮食评估:探索一个支持饮食干预的可教时刻。
Prostate. 2019 May;79(7):778-783. doi: 10.1002/pros.23783. Epub 2019 Mar 24.
6
The impact of cardiovascular genetic counseling on patient empowerment.心血管遗传咨询对患者赋权的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2019 Jun;28(3):570-577. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1050. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
7
Integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behaviour therapy for lifestyle mediators of overweight and obesity in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review and meta-analyses.综合动机性访谈和认知行为疗法对社区成年人超重和肥胖生活方式中介因素的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 5;18(1):1160. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6062-9.
8
Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR.乳腺癌筛查在高于平均风险的女性中的应用:来自 ACR 的建议。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Mar;15(3 Pt A):408-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.034. Epub 2018 Jan 19.
9
Evaluation of Empowerment in Health Promotion Interventions: A Systematic Review.健康促进干预中赋权的评估:一项系统综述
Eval Health Prof. 2018 Sep;41(3):351-392. doi: 10.1177/0163278716688065. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
10
Lifestyle Advice Combined with Personalized Estimates of Genetic or Phenotypic Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, and Objectively Measured Physical Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.生活方式建议结合2型糖尿病遗传或表型风险的个性化评估以及客观测量的身体活动:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 29;13(11):e1002185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002185. eCollection 2016 Nov.