• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌-卵巢癌易感性的遗传咨询与检测:女性想要什么?

Genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility: what do women want?

作者信息

Audrain J, Rimer B, Cella D, Garber J, Peshkin B N, Ellis J, Schildkraut J, Stefanek M, Vogel V, Lerman C

机构信息

Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):133-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.133.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.133
PMID:9440734
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess preferences for the content and process of genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility among women at high risk for breast cancer.

METHODS

Ninety-eight healthy women who had a family history of breast cancer in at least two first-degree relatives participated in a structured telephone survey that evaluated preferences for type of provider and the content and process of pretest education and posttest genetic counseling.

RESULTS

Forty-two percent of women preferred that pretest education be delivered by a genetic counselor, while 22% preferred an oncologist. This preference was positively associated with a desire to discuss psychosocial issues during the session (P = .001). For posttest counseling, 38% of women preferred an oncologist, while 20% preferred a genetic counselor. However, women who desired supportive counseling during this session were significantly more likely to prefer a genetic counselor to an oncologist (P = .02). Fewer women wished to see a primary care physician or gynecologist for pretest education (11%) or posttest counseling (22%). With regard to the counseling process, 82% of women wished to self-refer for genetic counseling, but 63% desired advice and recommendations about whether to be tested.

CONCLUSION

When feasible, the optimal approach may be for oncologists to work with genetic counselors to provide pretest education and medical recommendations. Elicitation of patients' preferences may be useful to determine the level of counseling services needed.

摘要

目的

评估乳腺癌高危女性对乳腺癌 - 卵巢癌易感性基因咨询和检测的内容及流程的偏好。

方法

98名在至少两名一级亲属中有乳腺癌家族史的健康女性参与了一项结构化电话调查,该调查评估了她们对咨询提供者类型以及检测前教育和检测后基因咨询的内容及流程的偏好。

结果

42%的女性希望由基因咨询师提供检测前教育,而22%的女性希望由肿瘤学家提供。这种偏好与在咨询过程中讨论心理社会问题的意愿呈正相关(P = .001)。对于检测后咨询,38%的女性希望由肿瘤学家进行,而20%的女性希望由基因咨询师进行。然而,在此阶段希望获得支持性咨询的女性明显更倾向于选择基因咨询师而非肿瘤学家(P = .02)。较少女性希望在检测前教育(11%)或检测后咨询(22%)时咨询初级保健医生或妇科医生。关于咨询流程,82%的女性希望自行转诊进行基因咨询,但63%的女性希望获得关于是否进行检测的建议和推荐。

结论

在可行的情况下,最佳方法可能是肿瘤学家与基因咨询师合作,提供检测前教育和医疗建议。了解患者的偏好可能有助于确定所需的咨询服务水平。

相似文献

1
Genetic counseling and testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility: what do women want?乳腺癌-卵巢癌易感性的遗传咨询与检测:女性想要什么?
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):133-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.133.
2
Patient and genetic counselor perceptions of in-person versus telephone genetic counseling for hereditary breast/ovarian cancer.患者及遗传咨询师对遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌面对面与电话遗传咨询的看法。
Fam Cancer. 2016 Oct;15(4):529-39. doi: 10.1007/s10689-016-9900-x.
3
Education about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: patient preferences for a computer program or genetic counselor.乳腺癌易感性基因检测教育:患者对计算机程序或遗传咨询师的偏好。
Am J Med Genet. 2001 Sep 15;103(1):24-31. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1501.
4
Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.关于采用预测试教育方法以增强BRCA1基因检测知情决策的对照试验。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Jan 15;89(2):148-57. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.2.148.
5
Randomized comparison of group versus individual genetic education and counseling for familial breast and/or ovarian cancer.家族性乳腺癌和/或卵巢癌群体与个体基因教育及咨询的随机对照比较
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3455-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.050.
6
Referral and experience with genetic testing among women with early onset breast cancer.早发性乳腺癌女性的基因检测转诊及经验
Genet Test. 2005 Winter;9(4):301-5. doi: 10.1089/gte.2005.9.301.
7
Simultaneous interdisciplinary counseling in German breast/ovarian cancer families: first experiences with patient perceptions, surveillance behavior and acceptance of genetic testing.德国乳腺癌/卵巢癌家族的同步跨学科咨询:关于患者认知、监测行为及基因检测接受度的初步经验
Genet Couns. 2000;11(2):127-46.
8
Evaluation of nurses and genetic counselors as providers of education about breast cancer susceptibility testing.评估护士和遗传咨询师作为乳腺癌易感性检测教育提供者的情况。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Jan-Feb;27(1):33-9.
9
Genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: risk assessment, genetic counseling, and management issues.乳腺癌和卵巢癌的遗传易感性:风险评估、遗传咨询及管理问题。
Mo Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;101(2):105-10; quiz 110-1.
10
Communication and information needs of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer regarding treatment-focused genetic testing.被诊断为卵巢癌的女性在以治疗为重点的基因检测方面的沟通与信息需求。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 May 1;40(3):275-83. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.40-03AP.

引用本文的文献

1
Finding all BRCA pathogenic mutation carriers: best practice models.寻找所有BRCA致病突变携带者:最佳实践模式。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Sep;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S19-26. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2016.95.
2
Management of medullary thyroid carcinoma and MEN2 syndromes in childhood.儿童时期的甲状腺髓样癌和 MEN2 综合征的管理。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2011 Aug 23;7(10):596-607. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.139.
3
Patient responses to genetic information: studies of patients with hereditary cancer syndromes identify issues for use of genetic testing in nephrology practice.
患者对遗传信息的反应:遗传性癌症综合征患者的研究确定了在肾病学实践中使用遗传检测的问题。
Semin Nephrol. 2010 Mar;30(2):203-14. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2010.01.011.
4
Predictive value of breast cancer cognitions and attitudes toward genetic testing on women's interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk.乳腺癌认知及对基因检测的态度对女性进行乳腺癌风险基因检测兴趣的预测价值。
Psychosoc Med. 2004 Jul 1;1:Doc03.
5
Determinants of preferences for genetic counselling in Jewish women.犹太女性对遗传咨询偏好的决定因素。
Fam Cancer. 2006;5(2):159-67. doi: 10.1007/s10689-005-3871-7.
6
How do women decide? Accepting or declining BRCA1/2 testing in a nationwide clinical sample in the United States.女性如何做出决定?在美国全国性临床样本中接受或拒绝BRCA1/2检测。
Community Genet. 2006;9(2):78-86. doi: 10.1159/000091484.
7
To test or not to test? Moderators of the relationship between risk perceptions and interest in predictive genetic testing.检测还是不检测?风险认知与预测性基因检测兴趣之间关系的调节因素。
J Behav Med. 2005 Oct;28(5):467-79. doi: 10.1007/s10865-005-9017-4. Epub 2005 Sep 30.
8
Reconsidering the family history in primary care.重新审视初级保健中的家族病史。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):273-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30401.x.
9
Tailoring communication in consultations with women from high risk breast cancer families.在与高危乳腺癌家族的女性进行会诊时调整沟通方式。
Br J Cancer. 2002 Aug 27;87(5):502-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600484.
10
Client perceptions of the impact of genetic counseling: an exploratory study.客户对遗传咨询影响的看法:一项探索性研究。
J Genet Couns. 1999 Aug;8(4):191-216. doi: 10.1023/a:1022946431820.