Suppr超能文献

评估欧洲淡水中镍的环境风险程度:对欧盟委员会现行方法的批判性反思。

Assessing the Extent of Environmental Risks From Nickel in European Freshwaters: A Critical Reflection of the European Commission's Current Approach.

机构信息

WCA Environment, Faringdon, UK.

NiPERA, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Environ Toxicol Chem. 2022 Jul;41(7):1604-1612. doi: 10.1002/etc.5352. Epub 2022 Jun 5.

Abstract

Nickel (Ni) has a been a Priority Substance under the European Water Framework Directive since 2008. As such it is deemed to present an European Union-wide risk to surface waters. Since 2013, the Ni Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) has been bioavailability-based, and new European Guidance supports accounting for bioavailability in assessing Ni compliance with the EQS. The European Commission has developed an approach to determine whether Priority Substances present a sufficient European Union-wide risk to justify an ongoing statutory monitoring programme, effectively to deselect a substance. This is a key step to ensure that finite monitoring resources are targeted at delivering environmental benefit, when there is an ever-growing burden of determinands to measure for all regulators. When the European Commission performed this exercise for Ni without accounting for bioavailability, they concluded that Ni should not be deselected, and Ni is an European Union-wide risk. Performing this same exercise with the same methodology, using regulatory monitoring data for over 300 000 samples, from more than 19 000 sites across Europe, and accounting for bioavailability, as detailed in the Directive, >99% of sites comply with the Ni EQS. Nickel shows very low risks for all of the criteria identified by the European Commission that need to be met for deselection. Accounting for bioavailability is key in the assessment of Ni risks in surface waters to deliver ecologically relevant outcomes. Environ Toxicol Chem 2022;41:1604-1612. © 2022 NiPERA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC.

摘要

镍(Ni)自 2008 年以来一直是《欧洲水框架指令》下的优先物质。因此,它被认为对地表水构成了全欧盟范围的风险。自 2013 年以来,镍环境质量标准(EQS)一直基于生物有效性,新的欧洲指南支持在评估镍是否符合 EQS 时考虑生物有效性。欧盟委员会已经开发了一种方法来确定优先物质是否存在足够的全欧盟范围的风险,以证明正在进行的法定监测计划是合理的,实际上是为了选择一种物质。这是确保有限的监测资源能够用于为所有监管机构提供环境效益的关键步骤,因为需要测量的确定物质的负担越来越大。当欧盟委员会在不考虑生物有效性的情况下对镍进行这项工作时,他们得出的结论是镍不应该被选择,镍是对整个欧盟的一种风险。使用相同的方法,使用来自欧洲各地 19000 多个地点的 30 多万个样本的监管监测数据,执行相同的练习,并根据指令详细说明考虑生物有效性,超过 99%的地点符合镍 EQS。镍在欧盟委员会确定的需要满足的所有标准下都表现出非常低的风险,这些标准需要满足才能选择。在评估地表水的镍风险时,考虑生物有效性是关键,以提供具有生态相关性的结果。《环境毒理学与化学》2022;41:1604-1612。©2022 NiPERA。环境毒理学与化学由 Wiley Periodicals LLC 代表 SETAC 出版。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0e55/9328137/ba06f249e329/ETC-41-1604-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验