From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands.
Radiology. 2022 Aug;304(2):322-330. doi: 10.1148/radiol.212904. Epub 2022 May 3.
Background Given the different methods of assessing emphysema, controversy exists as to whether it is associated with lung cancer. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between chest CT-defined emphysema and the presence of lung cancer. Materials and Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 15, 2021, to identify studies on the association between emphysema assessed visually or quantitatively with CT and lung cancer. Associations were determined by emphysema severity (trace, mild, or moderate to severe, assessed visually and quantitatively) and subtype (centrilobular and paraseptal, assessed visually). Overall and stratified pooled odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% CIs were obtained. Results Of the 3343 screened studies, 21 studies (107 082 patients) with 26 subsets were included. The overall pooled ORs for lung cancer given the presence of emphysema were 2.3 (95% CI: 2.0, 2.6; = 35%; 19 subsets) and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.02; six subsets) per 1% increase in low attenuation area. Studies with visual (pooled OR, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.9, 2.6; = 48%; 12 subsets) and quantitative (pooled OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.8, 2.8; = 3.7%; eight subsets) assessments yielded comparable results for the dichotomous assessment. Based on six studies (1716 patients), the pooled ORs for lung cancer increased with emphysema severity and were higher for visual assessment (2.5, 3.7, and 4.5 for trace, mild, and moderate to severe, respectively) than for quantitative assessment (1.9, 2.2, and 2.5) based on point estimates. Compared with no emphysema, only centrilobular emphysema (three studies) was associated with lung cancer (pooled OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5, 3.2; < .001). Conclusion Both visual and quantitative CT assessments of emphysema were associated with a higher odds of lung cancer, which also increased with emphysema severity. Regarding subtype, only centrilobular emphysema was significantly associated with lung cancer. Clinical trial registration no. CRD42021262163 © RSNA, 2022 . See also the editorial by Hunsaker in this issue.
鉴于评估肺气肿的方法不同,肺气肿是否与肺癌有关仍存在争议。目的:对胸部 CT 定义的肺气肿与肺癌存在之间的关系进行系统评价和荟萃分析。材料与方法:截至 2021 年 7 月 15 日,检索 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库,以确定使用 CT 视觉或定量评估肺气肿与肺癌之间关联的研究。通过肺气肿严重程度(视觉和定量评估的痕量、轻度或中重度)和亚型(视觉评估的小叶中心型和间隔旁型)来确定关联。获取总体和分层汇总优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间。结果:在筛选出的 3343 项研究中,纳入了 21 项研究(107082 名患者,分为 26 个亚组)。对于存在肺气肿的患者,肺癌的总体汇总 OR 为 2.3(95%CI:2.0,2.6; = 35%;19 个亚组)和 1.02(95%CI:1.01,1.02;6 个亚组)每增加 1%低衰减区。使用视觉(汇总 OR,2.3;95%CI:1.9,2.6; = 48%;12 个亚组)和定量(汇总 OR,2.2;95%CI:1.8,2.8; = 3.7%;8 个亚组)评估的研究对于二分类评估产生了可比的结果。基于 6 项研究(1716 名患者),肺癌的汇总 OR 随肺气肿严重程度增加而增加,视觉评估的汇总 OR 高于定量评估(痕量、轻度和中重度分别为 2.5、3.7 和 4.5),基于点估计。与无肺气肿相比,仅小叶中心型肺气肿(3 项研究)与肺癌相关(汇总 OR,2.2;95%CI:1.5,3.2; <.001)。结论:无论是视觉还是定量 CT 评估的肺气肿都与肺癌的发生几率增加相关,且与肺气肿严重程度呈正相关。就亚型而言,只有小叶中心型肺气肿与肺癌显著相关。临床研究注册号:CRD42021262163 ©RSNA,2022。也请参见本期杂志 Hunsaker 的社论。