Division of Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Pediatrics. 2022 May 1;149(Suppl 5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-053852D.
Vaccinations are recognized as a feasible, cost-effective public health intervention for reducing the burden and associated mortality of many infectious diseases. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of potential interventions to improve the uptake of vaccines among children and adolescents.
We performed a literature search until December 2020. Eligible studies were identified using Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, PubMed, and other sources. We included studies conducted on children and adolescents aged 5 to 19 years. Studies comprised of hospitalized children and those with comorbid conditions were excluded. Two authors independently performed the meta-analysis.
Findings from 120 studies (123 articles), of which 95 were meta-analyzed, reveal that vaccination education may increase overall vaccination coverage by 19% (risk ratio [RR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.26), reminders by 15% (RR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.11-1.18), interventions for providers by 13% (RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19), financial incentives by 67% (RR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.40-1.99), and multilevel interventions by 25% (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.10-1.41). The impact of school-based clinics and policy and legislation on overall vaccination coverage is still uncertain, and no impact of a multicomponent intervention on overall vaccination coverage was found.
Educational interventions, reminders, provider-directed interventions, financial incentives, and multilevel interventions may improve vaccination coverage among school-aged children and adolescents.
疫苗接种被认为是一种可行且具有成本效益的公共卫生干预措施,可降低许多传染病的负担和相关死亡率。本研究旨在评估改善儿童和青少年疫苗接种率的潜在干预措施的效果。
我们进行了截至 2020 年 12 月的文献检索。使用 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、MEDLINE、PubMed 和其他来源确定符合条件的研究。我们纳入了针对 5 至 19 岁儿童和青少年的研究。研究对象包括住院儿童和合并症患者。两位作者独立进行了荟萃分析。
从 120 项研究(123 篇文章)中得出的结果,其中 95 项进行了荟萃分析,发现疫苗接种教育可使总体疫苗接种覆盖率提高 19%(风险比[RR],1.19;95%置信区间[CI],1.12-1.26),提醒可提高 15%(RR,1.15;95% CI,1.11-1.18),提供者干预可提高 13%(RR,1.13;95% CI,1.07-1.19),经济激励可提高 67%(RR,1.67;95% CI,1.40-1.99),多层次干预可提高 25%(RR,1.25;95% CI,1.10-1.41)。基于学校的诊所和政策法规对总体疫苗接种覆盖率的影响仍不确定,也没有发现多组分干预对总体疫苗接种覆盖率有影响。
教育干预、提醒、面向提供者的干预、经济激励和多层次干预可能会提高学龄儿童和青少年的疫苗接种率。