• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《必有取舍:老年护理时间、儿童保育时间与员工幸福感之间的关系》。

Something's Gotta Give: The Relationship Between Time in Eldercare, Time in Childcare, and Employee Wellbeing.

机构信息

Sprott School of Business, 6339Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Ted Rogers School of Management, 7984Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 2022 Oct;34(6-8):1101-1116. doi: 10.1177/08982643221092876. Epub 2022 May 4.

DOI:10.1177/08982643221092876
PMID:35506685
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9483680/
Abstract

While existing research indicates that "sandwiched" employees (those with both childcare and eldercare demands) have lower wellbeing than employees with only eldercare demands, there is little understanding how childcare and eldercare demands interact to create those differences. Drawing on two studies, we hypothesize childcare demands amplify the negative impact of eldercare demands on wellbeing. Study 1 operationalizes childcare as a dichotomous variable (i.e., has childcare or not), and examines the relationship between hours per week in eldercare and wellbeing for two groups of employees: those with eldercare and those in the sandwich generation. Study 2, which operationalizes childcare as a continuous variable (i.e., hours in childcare per week), explores how time in childcare moderates the relationship between time in eldercare and wellbeing. Findings show time in eldercare is negatively associated with wellbeing, and the impact of childcare on the relationship between time in eldercare and wellbeing is dependent on how one operationalizes wellbeing and childcare constructs.

摘要

虽然现有研究表明,“夹心”员工(既有育儿需求又有照顾老人需求的员工)的幸福感低于只有照顾老人需求的员工,但对于育儿和照顾老人的需求如何相互作用产生这些差异,人们知之甚少。本研究基于两项研究,提出了育儿需求会放大照顾老人需求对幸福感的负面影响的假设。研究 1 将育儿需求操作化为二分变量(即有或没有育儿需求),并考察了每周照顾老人的时间与两类员工(有照顾老人需求的员工和“夹心”一代员工)的幸福感之间的关系。研究 2 将育儿需求操作化为连续变量(即每周育儿时间),探讨了育儿时间如何调节照顾老人时间与幸福感之间的关系。研究结果表明,每周照顾老人的时间与幸福感呈负相关,而育儿时间对照顾老人时间与幸福感之间关系的影响取决于幸福感和育儿构建的操作化方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb0/9483680/6e3ac3ef1f83/10.1177_08982643221092876-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb0/9483680/b265f2f1ee31/10.1177_08982643221092876-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb0/9483680/7a4a1a1523f7/10.1177_08982643221092876-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb0/9483680/6e3ac3ef1f83/10.1177_08982643221092876-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb0/9483680/b265f2f1ee31/10.1177_08982643221092876-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb0/9483680/7a4a1a1523f7/10.1177_08982643221092876-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bb0/9483680/6e3ac3ef1f83/10.1177_08982643221092876-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Something's Gotta Give: The Relationship Between Time in Eldercare, Time in Childcare, and Employee Wellbeing.《必有取舍:老年护理时间、儿童保育时间与员工幸福感之间的关系》。
J Aging Health. 2022 Oct;34(6-8):1101-1116. doi: 10.1177/08982643221092876. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Eldercare demands, mental health, and work performance: the moderating role of satisfaction with eldercare tasks.老年护理需求、心理健康和工作绩效:对老年护理任务满意度的调节作用。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2012 Jan;17(1):52-64. doi: 10.1037/a0025154. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
3
One size fits all? Contextualizing family-supportive supervision to help employees with eldercare responsibilities.一刀切?将家庭支持型监管情境化以帮助有照顾老人责任的员工。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2020 Oct;25(5):368-383. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000237. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
4
Characterizing Employees with Primary and Secondary Caregiving Responsibilities: Informal Care Provision in Malaysia.界定承担主要和次要照料责任的员工:马来西亚的非正式照料情况
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 16;11(14):2033. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142033.
5
When more is less: An examination of the relationship between hours in telework and role overload.物极必反:远程工作时长与角色过载关系之审视
Work. 2014;48(1):91-103. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141858.
6
The Relationship Between Institution-Affiliated Childcare and Employee Stress.机构附属儿童保育与员工压力之间的关系
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Jan;62(1):87-92. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001774.
7
Informal eldercare and work-related strain.非正式的老年护理和与工作相关的压力。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013 Mar;68(2):257-67. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs101. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
8
Randomized Video-Feedback Intervention in Home-Based Childcare: Improvement of Children's Wellbeing Dependent on Time Spent with Trusted Caregiver.家庭式儿童保育中的随机视频反馈干预:儿童幸福感的提升取决于与受信任照顾者相处的时间
Child Youth Care Forum. 2016;45:587-606. doi: 10.1007/s10566-015-9344-8. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
9
Working families and eldercare: a national perspective in an aging America.在职家庭与老年护理:老龄化美国的全国视角
Soc Work. 1990 Sep;35(5):405-11.
10
Understanding Moral Distress among Eldercare Workers: A Scoping Review.理解老年护理工作者的道德困境:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 29;19(15):9303. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159303.

引用本文的文献

1
But at What Cost? Healthcare Utilization of Canadian Carer-Employees.但代价是什么?加拿大护理人员员工的医疗保健利用情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;21(12):1686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121686.
2
Impact of Care-Recipient Health Conditions on Employed Caregiver Well-Being: Measure Development and Validation.受照顾者健康状况对在职照顾者幸福感的影响:测量工具的开发与验证
J Aging Health. 2025 Mar;37(3-4):192-209. doi: 10.1177/08982643241239086. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Family care work: a policy-relevant research agenda.家庭护理工作:一项与政策相关的研究议程。
Int J Care Caring. 2017 Mar;1(1):45-62. doi: 10.1332/239788217X14866284542346.
2
The Family Time Squeeze: Perceived Family Time Adequacy Buffers Work Strain in Certified Nursing Assistants With Multiple Caregiving Roles.家庭时间挤压:多角色照护认证护理助理感知的家庭时间充足可缓冲工作压力。
Gerontologist. 2018 May 8;58(3):546-555. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw191.
3
Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.工作需求-资源理论:总结与展望。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jul;22(3):273-285. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000056. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
4
Combining Formal and Informal Caregiving Roles: The Psychosocial Implications of Double- and Triple-Duty Care.结合正式与非正式照料角色:双重及三重职责照料的心理社会影响
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 Mar;71(2):201-11. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbu139. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
5
Socioeconomic and demographic factors modify the association between informal caregiving and health in the Sandwich Generation.社会经济和人口因素改变了三明治一代中非正式照料与健康之间的关联。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Apr 15;14:362. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-362.
6
Double-duty caregivers: healthcare professionals juggling employment and informal caregiving. A survey on personal health and work experiences.身兼两职的照顾者:兼顾工作与非正式护理的医疗保健专业人员。一项关于个人健康和工作经历的调查。
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jul;70(7):1604-15. doi: 10.1111/jan.12320. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
7
A resource perspective on the work-home interface: the work-home resources model.从资源视角看工作与家庭界面:工作-家庭资源模型。
Am Psychol. 2012 Oct;67(7):545-56. doi: 10.1037/a0027974. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
8
Elder care and the impact of caregiver strain on the health of employed caregivers.老年护理以及照顾者压力对在职照顾者健康的影响。
Work. 2011;40(1):29-40. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2011-1204.
9
Conservation of resources theory and research use in health systems.资源保护理论及其在卫生系统中的研究应用。
Implement Sci. 2010 Oct 20;5:79. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-79.
10
Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis.照料者与非照料者在心理健康和身体健康方面的差异:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Aging. 2003 Jun;18(2):250-67. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.250.