Duxbury Linda, Halinski Michael
Sprott School of Business, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Work. 2014;48(1):91-103. doi: 10.3233/WOR-141858.
Proponents of telework arrangements assert that those who telework have more control over their work and family domains than their counterparts who are not permitted to work from home.
Using Karasek's theory we hypothesized that the relationship between demands (hours in work per week; hours in childcare per week) and strain (work role overload; family role overload) would be moderated by the number of hours the employee spent per week teleworking (control).
To determine how the number of telework hours relates to work role overload and family role overload, we follow the test for moderation and mediation using hierarchical multiple regression analysis as outlined by Frazier et al. [50] We used survey data collected from 1,806 male and female professional employees who spent at least one hour per week working from home during regular hours (i.e. teleworking).
As hypothesized, the number of hours in telework per week negatively moderated the relation between work demands (total hours in paid employment per week) and work strain (work role overload). Contrary to our hypothesis, the number of hours in telework per week only partially mediated the relation between family demands (hours a week in childcare) and family role overload (strain).
The findings from this study support the idea that the control offered by telework is domain specific (helps employees meet demands at work but not at home).
远程工作安排的支持者称,与那些不被允许在家工作的人相比,远程工作者对其工作和家庭领域有更多的掌控权。
运用 Karasek 理论,我们假设需求(每周工作时长;每周育儿时长)与压力(工作角色过载;家庭角色过载)之间的关系会受到员工每周远程工作时长(掌控权)的调节。
为确定远程工作时长与工作角色过载和家庭角色过载之间的关系,我们按照 Frazier 等人概述的分层多元回归分析进行调节和中介检验。我们使用了从 1806 名男女专业员工收集的调查数据,这些员工每周在正常工作时间至少有一小时在家工作(即远程工作)。
正如假设的那样,每周远程工作时长对工作需求(每周带薪工作总时长)与工作压力(工作角色过载)之间的关系起到了负向调节作用。与我们的假设相反,每周远程工作时长仅部分中介了家庭需求(每周育儿时长)与家庭角色过载(压力)之间的关系。
本研究结果支持这样一种观点,即远程工作提供的掌控权是特定领域的(有助于员工满足工作需求,但对家庭需求无效)。