Department of Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Centre for Child and Adolescent Health, HELIOS Klinikum Krefeld, Lutherplatz 40, 47805, Krefeld, Germany.
Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Jul;181(7):2789-2797. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04469-w. Epub 2022 May 4.
The relevance to acknowledge the parental migration history in pediatric palliative care is widely recognized. However, its influence on integral parts of advance care planning (ACP) is unknown. In this non-interventional cohort study, we aimed at identifying systematic differences between pediatric palliative patients with varying parental countries of origin regarding medical orders for life-sustaining treatment and the location of patients' death. Two hundred eighty-eight pediatric cases in an ambulant pediatric palliative care setting in Germany were retrospectively analyzed using multinomial logistic regression models. Agreements on medical orders for life-sustaining treatment (MOLST) differed significantly between patients with varying parental countries of origin. Full code orders for life-sustaining treatment were made more often in Turkish families than in German families. There were no significant associations between the patients' location of death and the parental countries of origin. However, confounder-analysis revealed a strong association between the patients' underlying disease and the orders for life-sustaining treatment as well as the location of death.Conclusions: Even this study indicates that the parental geographical background as an important sociocultural aspect might have an impact on ACP decisions for children and adolescents with life-limiting conditions, other factors as the patients' underlying disease can be more crucial for decision making in pediatric palliative care. The reason for the differences found might lay in cultural preferences or barriers to appropriate care. The inclusion of sociocultural aspects in decision-making is crucial to guarantee culture-sensitive, patient-centered pediatric palliative care.
承认父母的移民历史在儿科临终关怀中具有重要意义已被广泛认可。然而,其对预先医疗指令(ACP)整体部分的影响尚不清楚。在这项非干预性队列研究中,我们旨在确定具有不同父母原籍国的儿科临终关怀患者在维持生命治疗的医疗指令和患者死亡地点方面是否存在系统差异。使用多项逻辑回归模型对德国流动儿科临终关怀环境中的 288 例儿科病例进行了回顾性分析。具有不同父母原籍国的患者之间在维持生命治疗的医疗指令(MOLST)上存在显著差异。在土耳其家庭中,维持生命治疗的全面代码指令比德国家庭更常见。患者死亡地点与父母原籍国之间没有显著关联。然而,混杂因素分析表明,患者的基础疾病与维持生命治疗的指令以及死亡地点之间存在强烈关联。
即使这项研究表明,父母的地理背景作为一个重要的社会文化方面可能会对患有生命有限条件的儿童和青少年的 ACP 决策产生影响,但其他因素,如患者的基础疾病,对于儿科临终关怀中的决策可能更为关键。所发现差异的原因可能在于文化偏好或适当护理的障碍。在决策中纳入社会文化方面对于保证文化敏感、以患者为中心的儿科临终关怀至关重要。