Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Zagreb School of Medicine and University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Jul;24(7):1305-1315. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2526. Epub 2022 May 24.
Temporal changes in patient selection and major technological developments have occurred in the field of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), yet analyses depicting this trend are lacking for Europe. We describe the advances of European LVAD programmes from the PCHF-VAD registry across device implantation eras.
Of 583 patients from 13 European centres in the registry, 556 patients (mean age 53 ± 12 years, 82% male) were eligible for this analysis. Patients were divided into eras (E) by date of LVAD implantation: E1 from December 2006 to December 2012 (6 years), E2 from January 2013 to January 2020 (7 years). Patients implanted more recently were older with more comorbidities, but less acutely ill. Receiving an LVAD in E2 was associated with improved 1-year survival in adjusted analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.98; p = 0.043). LVAD implantation in E2 was associated with a significantly lower chance of heart transplantation (adjusted HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.67; p = 0.001), and lower risk of LVAD-related infections (adjusted HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95; p = 0.027), both in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. The adjusted risk of haemocompatibility-related events decreased (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39-0.91; p = 0.016), while heart failure-related events increased in E2 (HR 1.67, 95% CI 1.02-2.75; p = 0.043).
In an analysis depicting the evolving landscape of continuous-flow LVAD carriers in Europe over 13 years, a trend towards better survival was seen in recent years, despite older recipients with more comorbidities, potentially attributable to increasing expertise of LVAD centres, improved patient selection and pump technology. However, a smaller chance of undergoing heart transplantation was noted in the second era, underscoring the relevance of improved outcomes on LVAD support.
左心室辅助装置(LVAD)领域的患者选择和主要技术发展发生了时间上的变化,但缺乏描述这一趋势的分析。我们描述了来自 PCHF-VAD 注册中心的欧洲 LVAD 项目在设备植入时代的进展。
在该注册中心的 13 个欧洲中心的 583 名患者中,556 名患者(平均年龄 53 ± 12 岁,82%为男性)符合本分析条件。患者按 LVAD 植入日期分为时代(E):E1 为 2006 年 12 月至 2012 年 12 月(6 年),E2 为 2013 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月(7 年)。最近接受 LVAD 植入的患者年龄较大,合并症更多,但病情不那么危急。在调整分析中,E2 中接受 LVAD 治疗与 1 年生存率提高相关(风险比[HR]0.58,95%置信区间[CI]0.35-0.98;p=0.043)。E2 中 LVAD 植入与心脏移植机会降低显著相关(调整 HR 0.40,95%CI 0.23-0.67;p=0.001),LVAD 相关感染风险降低(调整 HR 0.64,95%CI 0.43-0.95;p=0.027),无论在未调整还是调整分析中均如此。E2 中与血液相容性相关的事件风险降低(HR 0.60,95%CI 0.39-0.91;p=0.016),而心力衰竭相关事件增加(HR 1.67,95%CI 1.02-2.75;p=0.043)。
在对欧洲连续血流 LVAD 携带者 13 年的演变情况进行分析时,尽管接受者年龄较大且合并症较多,但近年来的生存率呈上升趋势,这可能归因于 LVAD 中心专业知识的提高、患者选择和泵技术的改进。然而,在第二个时代,心脏移植的机会较小,这强调了 LVAD 支持的结果改善的相关性。