• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于医院诊断和处方记录的北欧多重疾病指数的开发与验证

Development and Validation of a Nordic Multimorbidity Index Based on Hospital Diagnoses and Filled Prescriptions.

作者信息

Kristensen Kasper Bruun, Lund Lars Christian, Jensen Peter Bjødstrup, Broe Anne, Rotbain Emelie, Damkier Per, Pottegård Anton, Andersen Jacob Harbo, Højlund Mikkel, Olesen Morten, Rasmussen Lotte, Hansen Morten Rix, Ernst Martin Thomsen, Wesselhoeft Rikke, Henriksen Daniel Pilsgaard, Reilev Mette, Bliddal Mette, Hallas Jesper

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Department of Hematology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 27;14:567-579. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S353398. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S353398
PMID:35509520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9058012/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To develop the Nordic Multimorbidity Index (NMI), a multimorbidity measure specifically suited to the Nordic health and administrative registry data based on current diagnosis, treatment, and coding practices.

METHODS

The NMI was developed to predict 5-year mortality in a population-based cohort of randomly sampled Danish residents aged ≥40 years (n = 425,087) followed from 2013 to 2018. Included predictors were selected from hospital diagnoses and filled drug prescriptions based on a combination of subject matter knowledge and a data-driven approach using backwards elimination. The performance of the NMI was assessed in a temporal validation cohort of Danish residents followed from 2007 to 2012 and in six cohorts of new users of selected drugs. The discriminative performance of the NMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) was assessed using the c-statistic from logistic regression models with 5-year mortality as dependent variable and the multimorbidity index score, age, and sex as independent variables.

RESULTS

The NMI included 50 predictors. In the temporal validation cohort, the c-statistic of the NMI (0.887, 95% CI 0.883-0.890) exceeded that of the CCI (0.871, 95% CI 0.868-0.874) and ECI (0.866, 95% CI 0.863-0.870). In all new user cohorts, the NMI outperformed the other indices with c-statistics ranging from 0.781 (95% CI 0.779-0.784) to 0.838 (95% CI 0.834-0.842).

CONCLUSION

The NMI predicted 5-year mortality in a general Danish population and six cohorts of new users of selected drugs and was superior to the CCI and ECI. The NMI could be preferred over these indices to quantify the level of multimorbidity for, eg, descriptive purposes or confounding control. The NMI should be validated in other patient populations and other Nordic countries.

摘要

目的

开发北欧多重疾病指数(NMI),这是一种基于当前诊断、治疗和编码实践,特别适用于北欧健康和行政登记数据的多重疾病测量方法。

方法

开发NMI以预测2013年至2018年期间对年龄≥40岁的丹麦居民进行随机抽样的基于人群队列中的5年死亡率(n = 425,087)。纳入的预测因素是根据主题知识和使用向后消除法的数据驱动方法,从医院诊断和填写的药物处方中选择的。在2007年至2012年随访的丹麦居民的时间验证队列以及六个选定药物新用户队列中评估NMI的性能。使用以5年死亡率为因变量、多重疾病指数得分、年龄和性别为自变量的逻辑回归模型的c统计量,评估NMI、查尔森合并症指数(CCI)和埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数(ECI)的判别性能。

结果

NMI包括50个预测因素。在时间验证队列中,NMI的c统计量(0.887,95%CI 0.883 - 0.890)超过了CCI(0.871,95%CI 0.868 - 0.874)和ECI(0.866,95%CI 0.863 - 0.870)。在所有新用户队列中,NMI的表现优于其他指数,c统计量范围为0.781(95%CI 0.779 - 0.784)至0.838(95%CI 0.834 - 0.842)。

结论

NMI预测了丹麦普通人群和六个选定药物新用户队列中的5年死亡率,并且优于CCI和ECI。在例如描述目的或混杂控制等方面,与这些指数相比,NMI可能更受青睐以量化多重疾病水平。NMI应在其他患者群体和其他北欧国家进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c9/9058012/c9f0a49987a2/CLEP-14-567-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c9/9058012/8470ccfed081/CLEP-14-567-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c9/9058012/d097a4d5922f/CLEP-14-567-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c9/9058012/c9f0a49987a2/CLEP-14-567-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c9/9058012/8470ccfed081/CLEP-14-567-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c9/9058012/d097a4d5922f/CLEP-14-567-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/51c9/9058012/c9f0a49987a2/CLEP-14-567-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Validation of a Nordic Multimorbidity Index Based on Hospital Diagnoses and Filled Prescriptions.基于医院诊断和处方记录的北欧多重疾病指数的开发与验证
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Apr 27;14:567-579. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S353398. eCollection 2022.
2
Prediction Ability of Charlson, Elixhauser, and Rx-Risk Comorbidity Indices for Mortality in Patients with Hip Fracture. A Danish Population-Based Cohort Study from 2014 - 2018.Charlson指数、Elixhauser指数和Rx-Risk共病指数对髋部骨折患者死亡率的预测能力。一项基于丹麦人群的2014 - 2018年队列研究。
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 8;14:275-287. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S346745. eCollection 2022.
3
Any infection among patients with hip fracture: Predictive ability of Charlson, Elixhauser, Rx-Risk, and Nordic comorbidity indices.髋部骨折患者的任何感染:Charlson、Elixhauser、Rx-Risk 和北欧合并症指数的预测能力。
Surgeon. 2024 Feb;22(1):e61-e68. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2023.11.004. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
4
The new measuring multimorbidity index predicted mortality better than Charlson and Elixhauser indices among the general population.在普通人群中,新的测量多病共患指数比查尔森指数和埃利克斯豪泽指数能更好地预测死亡率。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Dec;92:99-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
5
Performance of Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index to Predict in-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Stroke in Sumadija and Western Serbia.查尔森合并症指数和埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数在预测塞尔维亚苏马迪亚和西塞尔维亚地区中风患者院内死亡率方面的表现。
Iran J Public Health. 2021 May;50(5):970-977. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6114.
6
Developing the Total Health Profile, a Generalizable Unified Set of Multimorbidity Risk Scores Derived From Machine Learning for Broad Patient Populations: Retrospective Cohort Study.开发全面健康状况评分,这是一套可推广的、基于机器学习的多病症风险评分体系,适用于广泛的患者群体:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 26;23(11):e32900. doi: 10.2196/32900.
7
Comparison of Three Comorbidity Measures for Predicting In-Hospital Death through a Clinical Administrative Nacional Database.基于临床行政国家数据库比较三种合并症指标预测住院死亡的能力。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 7;19(18):11262. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811262.
8
Changes in multimorbidity among hospitalized adults in the US.美国住院成年人中多重疾病的变化。
J Multimorb Comorb. 2024 Sep 3;14:26335565241283436. doi: 10.1177/26335565241283436. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Development and validation of a new prognostic index for mortality risk in multimorbid adults.多系统疾病成年人死亡风险新预后指数的制定与验证。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 5;17(8):e0271923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271923. eCollection 2022.
10
Predicting in-hospital mortality for dementia patients after hip fracture surgery - A comparison between the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index.预测髋部骨折手术后痴呆患者的院内死亡率 - Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)与 Elixhauser 合并症指数的比较。
J Orthop Sci. 2021 May;26(3):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.04.005. Epub 2020 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Polypharmacy independently predicts survival, hospitalization, and infections in patients with lymphoid cancer.多重用药可独立预测淋巴癌患者的生存率、住院率及感染情况。
Hemasphere. 2025 Jul 16;9(7):e70172. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70172. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Identified by STOPPFrail Among Danish Care Home Residents: A Nationwide Drug Utilisation Study.丹麦养老院居民中由 STOPPFrail 识别出的潜在不适当用药情况:一项全国性药物使用研究。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Aug;137(2):e70076. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.70076.
3
Polypharmacy's Association With Mortality: Confounding From Underlying Morbidity.

本文引用的文献

1
Who prescribes drugs to patients: A Danish register-based study.谁给患者开处方药:一项丹麦基于登记的研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Jul;87(7):2982-2987. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14691. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
2
Progress in cancer survival, mortality, and incidence in seven high-income countries 1995-2014 (ICBP SURVMARK-2): a population-based study.1995-2014 年七个高收入国家癌症存活率、死亡率和发病率的进展(ICBP SURVMARK-2):一项基于人群的研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1493-1505. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30456-5. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
3
The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.
多重用药与死亡率的关联:潜在疾病造成的混杂因素
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Aug;73(8):2485-2493. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19572. Epub 2025 Jul 4.
4
Social inequality in mental disorder diagnoses and psychotropic medication use among 15-year-old adolescents in Denmark from 2002-2022.2002年至2022年丹麦15岁青少年精神障碍诊断和精神药物使用方面的社会不平等。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s00127-025-02943-y.
5
Developmental trajectories in mental health through adolescence and adulthood: does socio-economic status matter?从青少年到成年期心理健康的发展轨迹:社会经济地位有影响吗?
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2025 Jun 20;34:e33. doi: 10.1017/S2045796025100073.
6
The risk of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia by metformin use and type 2 diabetes status - a Danish nation-wide cohort study.二甲双胍使用及2型糖尿病状态与骨髓增生异常综合征和急性髓系白血病的风险——一项丹麦全国队列研究
Acta Oncol. 2025 May 7;64:623-629. doi: 10.2340/1651-226X.2025.42422.
7
Temporal trends in incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer in Denmark from 2007 to 2022.2007年至2022年丹麦结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的时间趋势。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Aug 15;157(4):634-643. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35400. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
8
Second primary non-myeloid malignancies following intensive treatment for adult acute myeloid leukaemia: a Danish population-based cohort study.成人急性髓系白血病强化治疗后的第二原发性非髓系恶性肿瘤:一项基于丹麦人群的队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Dec 30;50:101204. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101204. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality associated with mental disorders: a population-based cohort study.与精神障碍相关的死亡率中的社会经济不平等:一项基于人群的队列研究。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;24(1):92-102. doi: 10.1002/wps.21278.
10
Major comorbid diseases as predictors of infection in the first month after hip fracture surgery: a population-based cohort study in 92,239 patients.主要合并症作为髋部骨折手术后第一个月感染的预测因素:92239 例患者的基于人群队列研究。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2024 Aug;15(4):1069-1080. doi: 10.1007/s41999-024-00989-w. Epub 2024 May 22.
丹麦医疗保健系统与流行病学研究:从医疗保健接触到数据库记录。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. eCollection 2019.
4
HIV.艾滋病病毒。
Lancet. 2018 Aug 25;392(10148):685-697. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31311-4. Epub 2018 Jul 23.
5
When and How Can Real World Data Analyses Substitute for Randomized Controlled Trials?真实世界数据分析何时以及如何能够替代随机对照试验?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Dec;102(6):924-933. doi: 10.1002/cpt.857. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
6
Data Resource Profile: The Danish National Prescription Registry.数据资源简介:丹麦国家处方登记处
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):798-798f. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw213.
7
Regression coefficient-based scoring system should be used to assign weights to the risk index.基于回归系数的评分系统应被用于为风险指数赋权。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;79:22-28. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.03.031. Epub 2016 May 13.
8
Catalog of 199 register-based definitions of chronic conditions.199种基于登记的慢性病定义目录。
Scand J Public Health. 2016 Jul;44(5):462-79. doi: 10.1177/1403494816641553. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
9
The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential.丹麦国家患者登记处:内容、数据质量及研究潜力综述
Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Nov 17;7:449-90. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S91125. eCollection 2015.
10
A literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results.关于随机对照试验样本代表性及其对试验结果外部有效性影响的文献综述。
Trials. 2015 Nov 3;16:495. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1023-4.