Suppr超能文献

查尔森合并症指数和埃利克斯豪泽合并症指数在预测塞尔维亚苏马迪亚和西塞尔维亚地区中风患者院内死亡率方面的表现。

Performance of Charlson and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index to Predict in-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Stroke in Sumadija and Western Serbia.

作者信息

Bajic Biljana, Galic Igor, Mihailovic Natasa, Ristic Svetlana, Radevic Svetlana, Cupic Violeta Iric, Kocic Sanja, Arnaut Aleksandra

机构信息

Health Promotion Center, Institute of Public Health Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.

Center for Control and Prevention of Noncommunicable Diseases, Institute for Public Health Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.

出版信息

Iran J Public Health. 2021 May;50(5):970-977. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6114.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comorbidities are major predictors of in-hospital mortality in stroke patients. The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the Elikhauser comorbidity index (ECI) are scoring systems for classifying comorbidities. We aimed to compare the performance of the CCI and ECI to predict in-hospital mortality in stroke patients.

METHODS

We included patients hospitalized for stroke in the Clinical Center of Kragujevac, Serbia for the last 7 years. Hospitalizations caused by stroke, were identified by the International Classification of Diseases-10 (ICD-10) codes I60.0 - I69.9. All patients were divided into two cohorts: Alive cohort (n=3297) and Mortality cohort (n=978).

RESULTS

There were significant associations between higher CCIS and increased risk of in-hospital mortality (HR = 1.07, 95% CI = 1.01-1.12) and between higher ECIS and increased risk of in-hospital mortality (HR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.99-1.09). Almost 2/3 patients (66.9%) had comorbidities included in the CCI score and 1/3 patients (30.2%) had comorbidities included in the ECI score. The statistically significant higher CCI score (t = -3.88, df = 1017.96, <0.01) and ECI score (t = -6.7, df = 1447.32, <0.01) was in the mortality cohort.Area Under the Curve for ECI score was 0.606 and for CCI score was 0.549.

CONCLUSION

Both, the CCI and the ECI can be used as scoring systems for classifying comorbidities in the administrative databases, but the model's ECI Score had a better discriminative performance of in-hospital mortality in the stroke patients than the CCI Score model.

摘要

背景

合并症是卒中患者院内死亡的主要预测因素。查尔森合并症指数(CCI)和埃利克豪泽合并症指数(ECI)是用于对合并症进行分类的评分系统。我们旨在比较CCI和ECI预测卒中患者院内死亡的性能。

方法

我们纳入了塞尔维亚克拉古耶瓦茨临床中心过去7年因卒中住院的患者。卒中导致的住院病例通过国际疾病分类第10版(ICD-10)编码I60.0 - I69.9进行识别。所有患者被分为两个队列:存活队列(n = 3297)和死亡队列(n = 978)。

结果

较高的CCI评分与院内死亡风险增加之间存在显著关联(HR = 1.07,95%CI = 1.01 - 1.12),较高的ECI评分与院内死亡风险增加之间也存在显著关联(HR = 1.04,95%CI = 0.99 - 1.09)。几乎2/3的患者(66.9%)存在CCI评分中包含的合并症,1/3的患者(30.2%)存在ECI评分中包含的合并症。死亡队列中的CCI评分(t = -3.88,df = 1017.96,P < 0.01)和ECI评分(t = -6.7,df = 1447.32,P < 0.01)在统计学上显著更高。ECI评分的曲线下面积为0.606,CCI评分的曲线下面积为0.549。

结论

CCI和ECI均可作为行政数据库中合并症分类的评分系统,但ECI评分模型在预测卒中患者院内死亡方面的判别性能优于CCI评分模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f663/8223561/869263daadbe/IJPH-50-970-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验