Rajaram Narayanan, Krishna Harini, Singh Ritu, Narayan Anil K
Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Andaman & Nicobar Islands Institute of Medical Sciences (ANIIMS), Port Blair, IND.
Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research, Kanakapura, IND.
Cureus. 2022 Apr 3;14(4):e23775. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23775. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most common cause of mortality worldwide. Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves the victim's outcome, especially when the response time for advanced life support is prolonged. We performed a study to estimate the difference in knowledge among first-year medical students after basic life support (BLS) training (part of their foundation course) before and during the novel COVID-19 pandemic.
We recruited first-year medical college students (batch of 2019-20: pre-COVID group - P and batch of 2020-21: COVID-19 era group - C) who were undergoing BLS training for the first time and consented to this study. Since the training was delayed and affected by COVID-19 for the batch of 2020-21, their training duration was shorter with more usage of audiovisual aids. The difference in the change in knowledge (by a questionnaire with 10 questions of one mark each) after training by the two methods was analysed. Analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square tests was used as applicable to compare the groups, and p-value <0.05 was considered significant. The results are analysed by IBM SPSS version 20.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).
The median (inter-quartile range) marks in group P (89 students) in the pre-test was 3 (4-2) and in the post-test was 6 (7-5) (out of 10). The corresponding marks in group C (112 students) in the pre-test were 3 (4-2) and in post-test was 7 (8-6). The knowledge improvement in group C was more with all the three changes being significant (p=0.0001). In group C, females had more improvement than males (p=0.0001).
We found a significant increase in the improvement of the knowledge after the BLS training in group C compared to group P. In group C, the improvement was better in females (59% increase in mean marks versus 22% in males).
心源性猝死(SCD)是全球最常见的死亡原因。旁观者心肺复苏(CPR)可改善患者预后,尤其是在高级生命支持响应时间延长的情况下。我们开展了一项研究,以评估在新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)大流行之前和期间,一年级医学生在接受基础生命支持(BLS,其基础课程的一部分)培训后知识水平的差异。
我们招募了首次接受BLS培训并同意参与本研究的一年级医学生(2019 - 20批次:COVID-19之前组 - P和2020 - 21批次:COVID-19时代组 - C)。由于2020 - 21批次的培训因COVID-19而延迟并受到影响,他们的培训时间较短,且更多地使用了视听教具。分析了两种方法培训后知识变化(通过一份有10个每题1分问题的问卷)的差异。根据适用情况,使用方差分析、Wilcoxon符号秩检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验来比较各组,p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果采用IBM SPSS 20.0版软件(SPSS公司,美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行分析。
P组(89名学生)预测试的中位数(四分位间距)分数为3(4 - 2),后测试为6(7 - 5)(满分10分)。C组(112名学生)预测试的相应分数为3(4 - 2),后测试为7(8 - 6)。C组的知识提升更大,所有三项变化均具有统计学意义(p = 0.0001)。在C组中,女性的提升比男性更大(p = 0.0001)。
我们发现,与P组相比,C组在接受BLS培训后知识水平的提升有显著增加。在C组中,女性的提升更好(平均分数增加59%,而男性为22%)。