• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无菌水机械针刺与利多卡因注射治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较

Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

作者信息

Suputtitada Areerat, Chen Carl P C, Pongpirul Krit

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, College of Medicine,Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2024 Jan;14(1):82-92. doi: 10.1177/21925682221094533. Epub 2022 May 4.

DOI:10.1177/21925682221094533
PMID:35510334
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10676179/
Abstract

This was a retrospective observational study that assessed the clinical outcome of ageing patients who received ultrasound-guided (USG) mechanical needling with sterile water injection. In addition, the clinical outcome of age-and gender matched patients randomly selected from patients who received needling with sterile water was compared to the patients injected with lidocaine in a 1:1 ratio. This present study aimed to explore the clinical effects of USG mechanical needling with sterile water injection for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The data was extracted from the medical records of ageing patients with LSS who received USG injection at the lumbosacral spine by the first author. Low back pain or axial pain, and leg pain or radicular pain were assessed by the visual analogue scale, and gait ability with walking distance were obtained at six different time points. A total of 4328 medical records were examined. Four thousand two hundred and twenty-eight ageing patients received mechanical needling with sterile water injection and found the efficacy lasted up to 6 months. One hundred patients were compared with 100 patients who received lidocaine injection. Those who received lidocaine had pain returned at 3 months and 6 months post-injection. USG mechanical needling with sterile water injection could help relieve axial and radicular pain for at least 6 months. Removal of calcification and fibrosis as well as reduction of sensitization are all possible mechanisms.

摘要

这是一项回顾性观察研究,评估了接受超声引导(USG)下无菌水注射机械针刺的老年患者的临床结局。此外,从接受无菌水针刺的患者中随机选取年龄和性别匹配的患者,与接受利多卡因注射的患者按1:1比例进行临床结局比较。本研究旨在探讨超声引导下无菌水注射机械针刺治疗腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)的临床效果。数据由第一作者从接受腰骶部超声引导注射的老年LSS患者的病历中提取。通过视觉模拟量表评估腰背痛或轴性疼痛以及腿痛或神经根性疼痛,并在六个不同时间点获得步行距离的步态能力。共检查了4328份病历。4228例老年患者接受了无菌水注射机械针刺,发现疗效可持续6个月。将100例患者与100例接受利多卡因注射的患者进行比较。接受利多卡因注射的患者在注射后3个月和6个月疼痛复发。超声引导下无菌水注射机械针刺可帮助缓解轴性和神经根性疼痛至少6个月。去除钙化和纤维化以及减轻敏化都是可能的机制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/cae415eef019/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/8e24c164cd0f/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/e5be5760bc45/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/f307ee368d3c/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/cae415eef019/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/8e24c164cd0f/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/e5be5760bc45/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/f307ee368d3c/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/862a/10676179/cae415eef019/10.1177_21925682221094533-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Mechanical Needling With Sterile Water Versus Lidocaine Injection for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.无菌水机械针刺与利多卡因注射治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较
Global Spine J. 2024 Jan;14(1):82-92. doi: 10.1177/21925682221094533. Epub 2022 May 4.
2
Prolotherapy at Multifidus Muscle versus Mechanical Needling and Sterile Water Injection in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.多裂肌处的注射疗法与机械针刺及无菌水注射治疗腰椎管狭窄症的对比研究
J Pain Res. 2023 Jul 18;16:2477-2486. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S417444. eCollection 2023.
3
Fluoroscopically guided caudal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar spine stenosis.荧光镜引导下尾侧硬膜外类固醇注射治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症
Pain Physician. 2007 Jul;10(4):547-58.
4
Photobiomodulation of the dorsal root ganglion for the treatment of low back pain: A pilot study.背根神经节的光生物调节治疗腰痛:一项初步研究。
Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Sep;48(7):653-9. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22522. Epub 2016 May 2.
5
The Effectiveness of Facet Joint Injection with Steroid and Botulinum Toxin in Severe Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.关节突关节注射类固醇和肉毒毒素治疗严重腰椎中央型椎管狭窄的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Toxins (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;15(1):11. doi: 10.3390/toxins15010011.
6
Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.腰椎管狭窄症伴退变性不稳定性患者后路横突间融合与后路腰椎间融合的临床疗效比较。
Pain Physician. 2018 Jul;21(4):383-406.
7
At Least 5-Year Follow-up After Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection Due to Lumbar Radicular Pain Caused by Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症引起的根性腰痛行经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射治疗后的至少 5 年随访。
Pain Pract. 2020 Sep;20(7):748-751. doi: 10.1111/papr.12905. Epub 2020 May 12.
8
Comparison of lidocaine injection, botulinum toxin injection, and dry needling to trigger points in myofascial pain syndrome.利多卡因注射、肉毒杆菌毒素注射与肌筋膜疼痛综合征触发点干针疗法的比较。
Rheumatol Int. 2005 Oct;25(8):604-11. doi: 10.1007/s00296-004-0485-6. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
9
Can patient characteristics predict benefit from epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms?患者特征能否预测硬膜外皮质类固醇注射治疗腰椎管狭窄症症状的疗效?
Spine J. 2015 Nov 1;15(11):2319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.050. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
10
Long-Term Effects of Repeated Injections of Local Anesthetic With or Without Corticosteroid for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Randomized Trial.重复注射局部麻醉剂联合或不联合皮质类固醇治疗腰椎管狭窄症的长期效果:一项随机试验
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1499-1507.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.029. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning prediction of extended length of stay following endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: A retrospective cohort study.内镜减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症后延长住院时间的机器学习预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 22;11:20552076251361658. doi: 10.1177/20552076251361658. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Efficiency of Lidocaine Intramuscular and Intraosseous Trigger Point Injections in the Treatment of Residual Chronic Pain after Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Decompression Surgery.利多卡因肌内注射和骨内触发点注射治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄减压术后残留慢性疼痛的疗效
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):5437. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185437.
3

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of shared decision-making on recovery from non-chronic aspecific low back pain in primary care; a post-hoc analysis from the patient, physician and observer perspectives.共同决策对基层医疗中急性非特异性腰痛康复的影响:基于患者、医生和观察者视角的事后分析
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Feb 2;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01624-y.
2
Radiological and functional assessment in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者的影像学和功能评估。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 10;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05053-x.
3
The influence of comorbidities on the treatment outcome in symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Emerging theory of sensitization in post-stroke muscle spasticity.
中风后肌肉痉挛致敏作用的新兴理论。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Sep 15;4:1169087. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1169087. eCollection 2023.
4
Prolotherapy at Multifidus Muscle versus Mechanical Needling and Sterile Water Injection in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.多裂肌处的注射疗法与机械针刺及无菌水注射治疗腰椎管狭窄症的对比研究
J Pain Res. 2023 Jul 18;16:2477-2486. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S417444. eCollection 2023.
5
Editorial: Highlights in medical and surgical rehabilitation 2021/22.社论:2021/22年度医学与外科康复亮点
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Jun 9;4:1219924. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1219924. eCollection 2023.
6
Intra-Articular Facet Joint Injection of Normal Saline for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.关节内关节突关节注射生理盐水治疗慢性下腰痛:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 28;59(6):1038. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061038.
合并症对症状性腰椎管狭窄症治疗结果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
N Am Spine Soc J. 2021 Jun 2;6:100072. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100072. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Non-operative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: an updated systematic review.腰椎管狭窄症伴神经源性跛行的非手术治疗:更新的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 19;12(1):e057724. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057724.
5
The association between pain, balance, fall, and disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with vascular claudication.伴有血管性间歇性跛行的腰椎管狭窄症患者疼痛、平衡、跌倒与残疾之间的关联。
Korean J Pain. 2021 Oct 1;34(4):471-478. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2021.34.4.471.
6
Physical and Psychological Factors Associated With Walking Capacity in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Neurogenic Claudication: A Systematic Scoping Review.腰椎管狭窄症伴神经源性间歇性跛行患者步行能力相关的生理和心理因素:一项系统综述。
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 9;12:720662. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.720662. eCollection 2021.
7
Acid Microenvironment in Bone Sarcomas.骨肉瘤中的酸性微环境
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 30;13(15):3848. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153848.
8
A comparison of successful versus failed nonoperative treatment approaches in patients with degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.比较腰椎退行性疾病患者非手术治疗成功与失败的方法。
J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Apr;86:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.033. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
9
Responsiveness of Outcome Measures in Nonsurgical Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Secondary Analysis From a Randomized Controlled Trial.非手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者结局测量指标的反应性:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Jun 15;46(12):788-795. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003920.
10
Facet joint injections for management of low back pain: a clinically focused review.用于管理下腰痛的小关节注射:一项临床重点综述。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Jan 31;15(1):8-18. doi: 10.17085/apm.2020.15.1.8.