• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性和女性步行与跑步时能量消耗及底物氧化的比较。

Comparison of energy expenditure and substrate oxidation between walking and running in men and women.

作者信息

Makino Akitoshi, Yamaguchi Keiichi, Sumi Daichi, Ichikawa Masaru, Ohno Masumi, Goto Kazushige

机构信息

Graduate School of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan.

Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Chiyodaku, Japan.

出版信息

Phys Act Nutr. 2022 Mar;26(1):8-13. doi: 10.20463/pan.2022.0002. Epub 2022 Mar 31.

DOI:10.20463/pan.2022.0002
PMID:35510440
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9081357/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The present study compared energy metabolism between walking and running at equivalent speeds during two incremental exercise tests.

METHODS

Thirty four university students (18 males, 16 females) were recruited. Each participant completed two trials, consisting of walking (Walk) and running (Run) trials on different days, with 2-3 days apart. Exercise on a treadmill was started from initial stage of 3 min (3.0 k/m in Walk trial, 5.0 km/h in Run trial), and the speed for walking and running was progressively every minute by 0.5 km/h. The changes in metabolic variables, heart rate (HR), and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) during exercise were compared between the trials.

RESULTS

Energy expenditure (EE) increased with speed in each trial. However, the Walk trial had a significantly higher EE than the Run trial at speeds exceeding 92 ± 2 % of the maximal walking speed (MWS, p < 0.01). Similarly, carbohydrate (CHO) oxidation was significantly higher in the Walk trial than in the Run trial at above 92 ± 2 %MWS in males (p < 0.001) and above 93 ± 1 %MWS in females (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that EE and CHO oxidation during walking increase non-linearly with speed, and walking at a fast speed causes greater metabolic responses than running at the equivalent speed in young participants.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了在两项递增运动测试中,相同速度下行走和跑步时的能量代谢情况。

方法

招募了34名大学生(18名男性,16名女性)。每位参与者完成两项测试,分别为在不同日期进行的行走(Walk)和跑步(Run)测试,间隔2至3天。跑步机运动从初始的3分钟开始(行走测试中为3.0千米/小时,跑步测试中为5.0千米/小时),行走和跑步速度每分钟递增0.5千米/小时。比较两项测试中运动期间代谢变量、心率(HR)和主观用力程度分级(RPE)的变化。

结果

在每项测试中,能量消耗(EE)均随速度增加。然而,在速度超过最大行走速度(MWS)的92±2%时,行走测试的EE显著高于跑步测试(p<0.01)。同样,在男性中,当速度高于92±2%MWS时,行走测试中的碳水化合物(CHO)氧化显著高于跑步测试(p<0.001);在女性中,当速度高于93±1%MWS时,情况也是如此(p<0.05)。

结论

这些发现表明,行走过程中的EE和CHO氧化随速度呈非线性增加,并且在年轻参与者中,快速行走比相同速度跑步会引起更大的代谢反应。

相似文献

1
Comparison of energy expenditure and substrate oxidation between walking and running in men and women.男性和女性步行与跑步时能量消耗及底物氧化的比较。
Phys Act Nutr. 2022 Mar;26(1):8-13. doi: 10.20463/pan.2022.0002. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
2
Energy expenditure comparison between walking and running in average fitness individuals.在普通健康个体中,行走和跑步的能量消耗比较。
J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Apr;26(4):1039-44. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31822e592c.
3
The metabolic transition speed between backward walking and running.向后行走与跑步之间的代谢转换速度。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Nov;90(5-6):520-5. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0890-7. Epub 2003 Jul 26.
4
Mouth rinsing with a sweet solution increases energy expenditure and decreases appetite during 60 min of self-regulated walking exercise.在60分钟的自主步行运动中,用甜味溶液漱口可增加能量消耗并降低食欲。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016 Dec;41(12):1255-1261. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2016-0344. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
Preferred transition speed between walking and running: effects of training status.步行与跑步之间的最佳转换速度:训练状态的影响
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Nov;37(11):1864-70. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000177217.12977.2f.
6
Locomotion Mode Affects the Physiological Strain during Exercise at Walk-Run Transition Speed inElderly Men.运动模式对老年男性在步行-跑步转换速度运动期间的生理应激有影响。
Int J Sports Med. 2017 Jul;38(7):515-520. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101913. Epub 2017 May 31.
7
Comparison of Acute Energy Expenditure and Rating of Perceived Exertion in Equivalent Bouts of Circuit Training and Treadmill Running.比较循环训练和跑步机跑步的等效回合中的急性能量消耗和感知用力等级。
J Strength Cond Res. 2021 Mar 1;35(3):680-687. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002731.
8
Physiological strain to prolonged exercise bouts at the walk-run transition speeds depends on locomotion mode in healthy untrained men.在健康的未经训练男性中,以走-跑转换速度进行长时间运动时的生理应激取决于运动模式。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Jul;27(7):762-769. doi: 10.1111/sms.12693. Epub 2016 May 27.
9
Comparison of substrate oxidation during walking and running in normal-weight and overweight/obese men.比较正常体重和超重/肥胖男性在行走和跑步时的底物氧化情况。
Obes Facts. 2012;5(3):327-38. doi: 10.1159/000339504. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
10
Psychological Responses to High-Intensity Interval Training: A Comparison of Graded Walking and Ungraded Running at Equivalent Metabolic Loads.对高强度间歇训练的心理反应:在同等代谢负荷下分级步行与非分级跑步的比较。
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2020 Feb 1;42(1):70-81. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2019-0200.

引用本文的文献

1
High-intensity interval training or lactate administration combined with aerobic training enhances visceral fat loss while promoting VMH neuroplasticity in female rats.高强度间歇训练或乳酸给药结合有氧运动训练可增强雌性大鼠的内脏脂肪减少,同时促进腹内侧下丘脑神经可塑性。
Lipids Health Dis. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12944-024-02397-2.
2
Ground reaction force and electromyograms of lower limb muscles during fast walking.快速行走过程中的地面反作用力和下肢肌肉肌电图
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 Feb 17;4:1055302. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1055302. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Continuous walking and time- and intensity-matched interval walking: Cardiometabolic demand and post-exercise enjoyment in insufficiently active, healthy adults.连续行走和时间及强度匹配的间歇行走:对活动量不足的健康成年人的心肺代谢需求和运动后愉悦感的影响。
J Sports Sci. 2021 Jan;39(1):23-30. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1803717. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
2
Effectiveness of High-Intensity Interval Training Versus Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training in Hypertensive Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.高强度间歇训练与高血压患者中等强度持续训练的效果比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020 Mar 3;22(3):26. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-1030-z.
3
The effects of 2 weeks of interval vs continuous walking training on glycaemic control and whole-body oxidative stress in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a controlled, randomised, crossover trial.
2周间歇性步行训练与持续步行训练对2型糖尿病患者血糖控制及全身氧化应激的影响:一项对照、随机、交叉试验。
Diabetologia. 2017 Mar;60(3):508-517. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4170-6. Epub 2016 Dec 9.
4
The role of sense of effort on self-selected cycling power output.用力感对自主选择的自行车功率输出的作用。
Front Physiol. 2014 Mar 31;5:115. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00115. eCollection 2014.
5
Peak fat oxidation rate during walking in sedentary overweight men and women.静坐生活方式超重男性和女性步行时的脂肪最大氧化率。
J Sports Sci Med. 2008 Dec 1;7(4):525-31. eCollection 2008.
6
Volume of supervised exercise training impacts glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-regression analysis.监督运动训练的量对 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制有影响:一项系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Diabetologia. 2013 Feb;56(2):242-51. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2774-z. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
7
The effects of free-living interval-walking training on glycemic control, body composition, and physical fitness in type 2 diabetic patients: a randomized, controlled trial.自由间歇步行训练对 2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制、身体成分和身体适应性的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):228-36. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0658. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
8
Heart rate prescribed walking training improves cardiorespiratory fitness but not glycaemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.心率规定步行训练可改善2型糖尿病患者的心肺适能,但对血糖控制无效。
J Sports Sci. 2010 Jan;28(1):93-9. doi: 10.1080/02640410903365685.
9
Intermittent versus constant aerobic exercise: effects on arterial stiffness.间歇性与持续性有氧运动对动脉僵硬度的影响。
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Mar;108(4):801-9. doi: 10.1007/s00421-009-1285-1.
10
Physical fitness and indices of lifestyle-related diseases before and after interval walking training in middle-aged and older males and females.中年和老年男性和女性在进行间歇步行训练前后的身体适应性和与生活方式相关疾病的指标。
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Mar;45(3):216-24. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.064816. Epub 2009 Oct 21.