Suppr超能文献

面对面与视频连线指导:家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试质量的比较。

In-person vs video hookup instructions: a comparison of home sleep apnea testing quality.

机构信息

Faculty of Computer Science, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Reykjavik University Sleep Institute, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.

出版信息

J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Aug 1;18(8):2069-2074. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10084.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the general population makes diagnosing OSA a high priority. Typically, patients receive in-person instructions to hook up the home sleep apnea test devices. Using recorded video instructions would save health care personnel time and improve access to OSA diagnostics for patients in remote areas. The aim of this study was to compare the quality of home sleep apnea test recordings when using in-person and video hookup instructions in a randomized study.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients aged 18 to 70 years with suspected OSA were randomized to receive either in-person or video hookup instructions for the Nox T3 device (Nox Medical, Reykjavik, Iceland). The overall quality of the resulting sleep studies was analyzed by determining the number of technically invalid studies. The recording quality of 4 sensors (pulse oximeter, nasal cannula, thorax and abdominal respiratory inductance plethysmography belts) was assessed by checking for signal artifacts.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the 2 groups in any quality index. Only 1 (2%) and 2 (3.9%) sleep studies were technically invalid in the in-person and video instructions group, respectively. The average ± standard deviation recording quality of the 4 sensors combined was 94.8% ± 13.6% for the in-person and 96.0% ± 11.0% for the video instructions group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found no difference in home sleep apnea test recording quality between the 2 groups. Video hookup instructions are therefore viable and an important step toward a telemedicine-based way of diagnosing OSA.

CITATION

Horne AF, Olafsdottir KA, Arnardottir ES. In-person vs video hookup instructions: a comparison of home sleep apnea testing quality. . 2022;18(8):2069-2074.

摘要

研究目的

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)在普通人群中的高患病率使得诊断 OSA 成为当务之急。通常,患者会接受亲自指导以连接家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试设备。使用录制的视频说明可以节省医疗保健人员的时间,并为偏远地区的患者提供更好的 OSA 诊断途径。本研究的目的是在一项随机研究中比较使用亲自和视频连接说明时家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试记录的质量。

方法

共 100 名年龄在 18 至 70 岁之间、疑似 OSA 的患者被随机分为亲自或视频连接说明组,用于 Nox T3 设备(Nox Medical,雷克雅未克,冰岛)。通过确定技术无效研究的数量来分析整个睡眠研究的质量。通过检查信号伪影来评估 4 个传感器(脉搏血氧仪、鼻插管、胸部和腹部呼吸感应体描记带)的记录质量。

结果

在任何质量指标上,两组之间均无显著差异。在亲自和视频说明组中,仅有 1 项(2%)和 2 项(3.9%)睡眠研究技术上无效。4 个传感器(脉搏血氧仪、鼻插管、胸部和腹部呼吸感应体描记带)的平均记录质量分别为亲自组的 94.8%±13.6%和视频说明组的 96.0%±11.0%。

结论

本研究未发现两组家庭睡眠呼吸暂停测试记录质量存在差异。因此,视频连接说明是可行的,是实现基于远程医疗的 OSA 诊断方法的重要一步。

相似文献

1
In-person vs video hookup instructions: a comparison of home sleep apnea testing quality.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2022 Aug 1;18(8):2069-2074. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10084.
2
Is video demonstration for type III sleep studies performance worse than technical face-to-face teaching?
Sleep Breath. 2024 Oct;28(5):2029-2035. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03096-z. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
3
4
Obstructive sleep apnea devices for out-of-center (OOC) testing: technology evaluation.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2011 Oct 15;7(5):531-48. doi: 10.5664/JCSM.1328.
9
Comparison of home sleep apnea testing versus laboratory polysomnography for the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in children.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep;100:44-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jun 16.
10
Utility of home sleep apnea testing in high-risk veterans.
Sleep Breath. 2017 Sep;21(3):647-655. doi: 10.1007/s11325-017-1467-8. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Is video demonstration for type III sleep studies performance worse than technical face-to-face teaching?
Sleep Breath. 2024 Oct;28(5):2029-2035. doi: 10.1007/s11325-024-03096-z. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
2
A Narrative Review of the Clinical Trials in Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders from 2022 to Present.
Thorac Res Pract. 2023 Nov 28;25(1):42 - 49. doi: 10.5152/ThoracResPract.2023.23104.

本文引用的文献

1
The Future of Sleep Measurements: A Review and Perspective.
Sleep Med Clin. 2021 Sep;16(3):447-464. doi: 10.1016/j.jsmc.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Estimation of the global prevalence and burden of obstructive sleep apnoea: a literature-based analysis.
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Aug;7(8):687-698. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30198-5. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
3
Telemedicine in the diagnosis and treatment of sleep apnoea.
Eur Respir Rev. 2019 Mar 14;28(151). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0093-2018. Print 2019 Mar 31.
4
Clinical Use of a Home Sleep Apnea Test: An Updated American Academy of Sleep Medicine Position Statement.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Dec 15;14(12):2075-2077. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7540.
5
"Diagnosis of sleep apnea in network" respiratory polygraphy as a decentralization strategy.
Sleep Sci. 2016 Jul-Sep;9(3):244-248. doi: 10.1016/j.slsci.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
6
Remote Ambulatory Management of Veterans with Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
Sleep. 2016 Mar 1;39(3):501-9. doi: 10.5665/sleep.5514.
7
Obstructive sleep apnea is a common disorder in the population-a review on the epidemiology of sleep apnea.
J Thorac Dis. 2015 Aug;7(8):1311-22. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.06.11.
8
Variability in recording and scoring of respiratory events during sleep in Europe: a need for uniform standards.
J Sleep Res. 2016 Apr;25(2):144-57. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12353. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
9
Real-time attended home-polysomnography with telematic data transmission.
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Aug;82(8):696-701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.02.008. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
10
Reliability of telemedicine in the diagnosis and treatment of sleep apnea syndrome.
Telemed J E Health. 2013 Jan;19(1):7-12. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0007. Epub 2012 Nov 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验