• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

枪支伤害预防和极端风险保护令。

Firearm Injury Prevention and Extreme Risk Protection Orders.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Pract. 2022 May 1;28(3):240-243. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000631.

DOI:10.1097/PRA.0000000000000631
PMID:35511101
Abstract

Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) represent a potential mechanism to facilitate firearm-related lethal means safety. ERPOs are a legal mechanism that enables law enforcement to temporarily remove firearms from, and prevent firearm purchase by, an individual who presents a significant danger to self or others, as determined by a court of law. While few jurisdictions currently allow mental health professionals to initiate ERPO petitions, it nonetheless seems important that clinicians be familiar with ERPOs, as clinicians may still serve an important role in disseminating information and facilitating judicious petitions. However, ERPO laws remain quite new, and the implications for mental health professionals when participating (directly or indirectly) in ERPOs remain unclear. This column introduces readers to ERPOs and offers resources to learn more about how ERPOs work across various jurisdictions.

摘要

极端风险保护令 (ERPO) 代表了一种将医学专业学术文献翻译为简体中文的潜在机制,可促进与枪支相关的致命手段的安全性。ERPO 是一种法律机制,使执法部门能够根据法院的裁决,暂时将枪支从对自己或他人构成重大危险的个人手中移除,并阻止其购买枪支。虽然目前很少有司法管辖区允许心理健康专业人员提出 ERPO 申请,但临床医生熟悉 ERPO 似乎很重要,因为临床医生在传播信息和促进明智的申请方面仍可能发挥重要作用。然而,ERPO 法律仍然相当新,当心理健康专业人员直接或间接参与 ERPO 时,其参与的影响尚不清楚。本专栏向读者介绍 ERPO,并提供资源,以了解更多关于 ERPO 在不同司法管辖区运作的信息。

相似文献

1
Firearm Injury Prevention and Extreme Risk Protection Orders.枪支伤害预防和极端风险保护令。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2022 May 1;28(3):240-243. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000631.
2
Implementation of Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Colorado from 2020 to 2022: Firearm relinquishment and return and petitioner characteristics.2020年至2022年科罗拉多州极端风险保护令的实施情况:枪支上缴与归还以及申请人特征
Prev Med Rep. 2024 Jun 20;44:102800. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102800. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
Petitions for Extreme Risk Protection Orders and Second Amendment Sanctuary Status in Colorado.科罗拉多州的极端风险保护令和第二修正案庇护州地位请愿书。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e244381. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.4381.
4
Extreme risk protection orders in King County, Washington: the epidemiology of dangerous behaviors and an intervention response.华盛顿州金县的极端风险保护令:危险行为的流行病学及干预应对措施
Inj Epidemiol. 2020 Jul 22;7(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40621-020-00270-1.
5
Extreme risk protection orders, race/ethnicity, and equity: Evidence from California.极端风险保护令、种族/民族与公平:来自加利福尼亚的证据。
Prev Med. 2022 Dec;165(Pt A):107181. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107181. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
6
Assessment of Physician Self-reported Knowledge and Use of Maryland's Extreme Risk Protection Order Law.评估医生自我报告的知识和使用马里兰州的极端风险保护令法律的情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918037. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18037.
7
Physicians' perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) in the clinical setting: Challenges and opportunities for gun violence prevention.临床环境中医生对极端风险保护令(ERPOs)的看法:枪支暴力预防的挑战和机遇。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 13;17(9):e0274489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274489. eCollection 2022.
8
Survey of Washington clinicians' willingness to use and preferences related to extreme risk protection orders.华盛顿临床医生对使用极端风险保护令的意愿及相关偏好调查。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 Jul 5;28:101883. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101883. eCollection 2022 Aug.
9
Integration of extreme risk protection orders into the clinical workflow: Qualitative comparison of clinician perspectives.将极端风险保护令纳入临床工作流程:临床医生观点的定性比较。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 29;18(12):e0288880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288880. eCollection 2023.
10
Five Years of Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Oregon: A Descriptive Analysis.俄勒冈州五年极端风险保护令:描述性分析
Psychol Rep. 2024 Apr 26:332941241248599. doi: 10.1177/00332941241248599.

引用本文的文献

1
Firearm Restraining Order Implementation Case Study in Lake County, Illinois.伊利诺伊州莱克县枪支限制令实施案例研究
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251371370. doi: 10.1177/00469580251371370. Epub 2025 Sep 9.