• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于 BMI 状态和组织学亚型检测子宫内膜癌 MSI 表型可能性的有效算法:一项统计研究。

An effective algorithm to detect the possibility of being MSI phenotype in endometrial cancer given the BMI status and histological subtype: a statistical study.

机构信息

Pathological Anatomy Service, Canary University Hospital, Tenerife, Spain.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Sep;24(9):1809-1817. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02837-4. Epub 2022 May 5.

DOI:10.1007/s12094-022-02837-4
PMID:35511397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338113/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In endometrial cancer, the incidence of mutations in mismatch repair genes (MMR) is estimated at 17-30%. Patients with alterations at this level (MSI) are known to have different clinical and anatomopathological characteristics than those without this genetic alteration (MSS). In this study, we aim to identify the MSI phenotype in patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. We assessed the correlation of this phenotype with anatomoclinical parameters such as obesity and histological subtype.

METHODS/PATIENTS: Clinical and anatomopathological data were collected from 147 patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer and an immunohistochemical study of MMR system proteins was performed. PMS2 and MSH6 proteins were evaluated as primary screening and subsequent evaluation of MLH1 and MSH6, respectively, if the former were negative. Statistical association between the anatomopathological data and the immunohistochemical result was analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

22.4% of our patients were MSI phenotype. We obtained statistically significant differences by multivariate analysis between endometrioid subtype and higher FIGO classification grade with MSI phenotype and obesity with MSS phenotype. Given these statistical results, we propose a function for predicting the probability of being MSI phenotype taking into account the histological subtype (endometrioid/non-endometrioid carcinoma) and FIGO grade as well as obesity. This prediction may be useful prior to hysterectomy, for genetic study of the MLH1 promoter and subsequent genetic counseling.

摘要

目的

在子宫内膜癌中,错配修复基因(MMR)的突变发生率估计为 17-30%。与没有这种遗传改变(MSS)的患者相比,具有这种水平改变(MSI)的患者具有不同的临床和解剖病理学特征。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定接受子宫内膜癌子宫切除术的患者的 MSI 表型。我们评估了这种表型与肥胖和组织学亚型等解剖临床参数的相关性。

方法/患者:收集了 147 名被诊断为子宫内膜癌的患者的临床和解剖病理学数据,并对 MMR 系统蛋白进行了免疫组织化学研究。PMS2 和 MSH6 蛋白作为原发性筛选进行评估,如果前者为阴性,则对 MLH1 和 MSH6 进行后续评估。分析了解剖病理学数据与免疫组织化学结果之间的统计学关联。

结果和结论

我们的患者中有 22.4%为 MSI 表型。通过多变量分析,我们获得了具有统计学意义的差异,即 MSI 表型与子宫内膜样亚型和更高的 FIGO 分级以及 MSS 表型与肥胖相关,而与非子宫内膜样癌和较低的 FIGO 分级相关。鉴于这些统计结果,我们提出了一种考虑组织学亚型(子宫内膜样癌/非子宫内膜样癌)和 FIGO 分级以及肥胖的预测 MSI 表型概率的功能。在子宫切除术前,这种预测可能对 MLH1 启动子的遗传研究和随后的遗传咨询有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/5cfcdca498d0/12094_2022_2837_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/1e9f00468744/12094_2022_2837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/8b0ec86490da/12094_2022_2837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/606e05b2825e/12094_2022_2837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/5cfcdca498d0/12094_2022_2837_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/1e9f00468744/12094_2022_2837_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/8b0ec86490da/12094_2022_2837_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/606e05b2825e/12094_2022_2837_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/30b4/9338113/5cfcdca498d0/12094_2022_2837_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An effective algorithm to detect the possibility of being MSI phenotype in endometrial cancer given the BMI status and histological subtype: a statistical study.一种基于 BMI 状态和组织学亚型检测子宫内膜癌 MSI 表型可能性的有效算法:一项统计研究。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2022 Sep;24(9):1809-1817. doi: 10.1007/s12094-022-02837-4. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
[Analysis of microsatellite instability in endometroid carcinoma with deficient mismatch repair].错配修复缺陷型子宫内膜样癌的微卫星不稳定性分析
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2021 May 8;50(5):470-475. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112151-20210201-00114.
3
Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancer: Immunohistochemistry Staining and Clinical Implications.子宫内膜癌中的错配修复缺陷:免疫组织化学染色及临床意义
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2019 Oct;27(9):678-682. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000641.
4
Universal endometrial cancer tumor typing: How much has immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability, and MLH1 methylation improved the diagnosis of Lynch syndrome across the population?通用子宫内膜癌肿瘤分型:免疫组织化学、微卫星不稳定性和 MLH1 甲基化在多大程度上改善了人群中林奇综合征的诊断?
Cancer. 2019 Sep 15;125(18):3172-3183. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32203. Epub 2019 May 31.
5
Applicability of the FDA-approved Immunohistochemical Panel for Identification of MMRd Phenotype in Uterine Endometrioid Carcinoma.FDA 批准的免疫组织化学 panel 用于鉴定子宫内膜样型子宫癌中 MMRd 表型的适用性。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2024 Jan 1;32(1):24-31. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001170. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
6
[Comprehensive assessment of mismatch repair and microsatellite instability status in molecular classification of endometrial carcinoma].[子宫内膜癌分子分类中错配修复及微卫星不稳定性状态的综合评估]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Oct 25;58(10):755-765. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112141-20230711-00316.
7
[Expression and clinical significance of MMR protein and MLH1 promoter methylation testing in endometrial cancer].[错配修复蛋白及MLH1启动子甲基化检测在子宫内膜癌中的表达及临床意义]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 25;53(12):823-830. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2018.12.005.
8
Comparison of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer: a prospective cohort study in China.中国一项新诊断子宫内膜癌患者林奇综合征筛查策略的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019 Jul 15;39(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40880-019-0388-2.
9
Frequent CTNNB1 or PIK3CA Mutations Occurred in Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma With High Levels of Microsatellite Instability and Loss of MSH2/MSH6 Expression.高频 CTNNB1 或 PIK3CA 突变发生于伴有高水平微卫星不稳定性和 MSH2/MSH6 表达缺失的子宫内膜样腺癌中。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2020 Apr;28(4):284-289. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000749.
10
Analysis of 108 patients with endometrial carcinoma using the PROMISE classification and additional genetic analyses for MMR-D.采用 PROMISE 分类和额外的 MMR-D 基因分析对 108 例子宫内膜癌患者进行分析。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Apr;157(1):245-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.019. Epub 2020 Jan 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Mismatch repair status in high-grade endometrial carcinomas of endometrioid and non-endometrioid type.子宫内膜样和非子宫内膜样类型的高级别子宫内膜癌中的错配修复状态。
J BUON. 2019 Sep-Oct;24(5):2020-2027.
2
Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Endometrial Cancer: Immunohistochemistry Staining and Clinical Implications.子宫内膜癌中的错配修复缺陷:免疫组织化学染色及临床意义
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2019 Oct;27(9):678-682. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000641.
3
Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosis: Use of FIGO Grading and Genomic Subcategories in Clinical Practice: Recommendations of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
子宫内膜癌诊断:国际妇产科病理学家学会关于在临床实践中使用国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分级和基因组亚类的建议
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019 Jan;38 Suppl 1(Iss 1 Suppl 1):S64-S74. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000518.
4
Association of BMI with overall and cause-specific mortality: a population-based cohort study of 3·6 million adults in the UK.体重指数与全因和死因特异性死亡率的关联:英国 360 万成年人的基于人群队列研究。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Dec;6(12):944-953. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30288-2. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
5
Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods.估算 2018 年全球癌症发病率和死亡率:GLOBOCAN 来源和方法。
Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941-1953. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31937. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Endometrial cancer in the elderly: does age influence surgical treatments, outcomes, and prognosis?老年子宫内膜癌:年龄是否影响手术治疗、结局和预后?
Menopause. 2018 Sep;25(9):968-976. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001119.
7
Uterine Neoplasms, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.《子宫肿瘤(第 1.2018 版)》,NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Feb;16(2):170-199. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.0006.
8
Gynaecological neoplasms in common familial syndromes (Lynch and HBOC).常见家族性综合征中的妇科肿瘤(林奇和 HBOC)。
Pathology. 2018 Feb;50(2):222-237. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
9
Immunotherapy and patients treated for cancer with microsatellite instability.免疫疗法与接受微卫星不稳定性癌症治疗的患者。
Bull Cancer. 2017 Jan;104(1):42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2016.11.006. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
10
Clinicopathologic implications of DNA mismatch repair status in endometrial carcinomas.子宫内膜癌中DNA错配修复状态的临床病理意义
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Feb;140(2):226-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.11.032. Epub 2015 Nov 28.