• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

给心理学家的规定性权力:下一步。

Prescriptive authority for psychologists: The next step.

机构信息

PsyD Program in Clinical Psychology, Antioch University.

出版信息

Psychol Serv. 2023 May;20(2):363-381. doi: 10.1037/ser0000667. Epub 2022 May 5.

DOI:10.1037/ser0000667
PMID:35511569
Abstract

[Correction Notice: An Erratum for this article was reported online in on Jul 11 2022 (see record 2022-79840-001). In the original article, changes were needed to clarify the timeline of state legalizations of prescriptive authority for psychologists (RxP) and the current status of RxP with regard to the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP). In the second paragraph of the "RxP From 2011 to Present" section, the citations relating to legalization in Idaho and Iowa were corrected, and the year in the Prescribing Psychologist reference was corrected in the References section and in text citations throughout. Additionally, in the last paragraph of the "RxP From 2011 to Present" section, the text was updated to clarify that at the present time, prescribing psychologists are not able to prescribe for the BOP. All versions of this article have been corrected.] Since the endorsement of prescriptive authority for psychologists (RxP) by the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1995, it has become legal in five states (Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, and New Mexico). The Department of Defense, including the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Army, and U.S. Navy, as well as the Public Health Service, and the Indian Health Service, continue to utilize prescribing psychologists as well. There are now over 200 prescribing psychologists in the United States. Five APA-designated RxP training programs offer a pathway to attain prescription privileges and future board certification when approved. The purpose of this article is to provide information for those with minimal exposure to RxP, updates for those more informed, and recommendations for the next phase of RxP. This article examines scholarship related to RxP as well as newsletter columns, state legislative efforts, current RxP laws, policies, training programs, and critical events in the RxP history. Public access to quality and comprehensive mental health services can be expected to improve as more psychologists complete the necessary RxP training and licensure requirements. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

[勘误通知:本文的勘误在线发布于 2022 年 7 月 11 日的在线版上(见记录 2022-79840-001)。在原始文章中,需要进行更改以澄清心理学家处方权(RxP)的州合法化时间表以及联邦监狱局(BOP)的 RxP 现状。在“从 2011 年到现在的 RxP”部分的第二段中,对与爱达荷州和爱荷华州合法化相关的引文进行了更正,并在参考文献部分和整个文本引文中更正了《处方心理学家》参考资料中的年份。此外,在“从 2011 年到现在的 RxP”部分的最后一段中,更新了文本,以澄清目前,开处方的心理学家无法为 BOP 开处方。本文的所有版本均已更正。]自 1995 年美国心理协会(APA)认可心理学家的处方权(RxP)以来,已有五个州(爱达荷州、伊利诺伊州、爱荷华州、路易斯安那州和新墨西哥州)将其合法化。美国国防部,包括美国空军、美国陆军和美国海军,以及公共卫生服务和印第安卫生服务,也继续使用开处方的心理学家。目前美国有 200 多名开处方的心理学家。五个 APA 指定的 RxP 培训计划提供了一条获得处方特权和未来董事会认证的途径,一旦获得批准。本文的目的是为那些对 RxP 接触较少的人提供信息,为那些了解更多信息的人提供更新,并为 RxP 的下一阶段提供建议。本文考察了与 RxP 相关的奖学金以及通讯栏目、州立法努力、当前的 RxP 法律、政策、培训计划以及 RxP 历史上的关键事件。随着越来越多的心理学家完成必要的 RxP 培训和许可要求,公众可以预期获得更好的质量和全面的心理健康服务。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Prescriptive authority for psychologists: The next step.给心理学家的规定性权力:下一步。
Psychol Serv. 2023 May;20(2):363-381. doi: 10.1037/ser0000667. Epub 2022 May 5.
2
"Prescriptive authority for psychologists: The next step": Correction.“心理学家的处方权:下一步”:勘误
Psychol Serv. 2023 May;20(2):381. doi: 10.1037/ser0000687. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
3
Prescribing privileges: grail for some practitioners, potential calamity for interprofessional collaboration in mental health.
J Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;58(6):681-96. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10053.
4
Effects of giving psychologists prescriptive authority: Evidence from a natural experiment in the United States.赋予心理学家处方权的效果:来自美国自然实验的证据。
Health Policy. 2023 Aug;134:104846. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2023.104846. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
5
The case against prescription privileges for psychologists.反对赋予心理学家处方权的理由。
Am Psychol. 1996 Mar;51(3):207-12. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.51.3.207.
6
Predoctoral prescriptive authority curricula: a training option.研究生规培授权课程:一种培训选择。
J Clin Psychol. 2012 Mar;68(3):246-62. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20828. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
7
The revised 2019 standards for psychopharmacological training: Model education and training program in psychopharmacology for prescriptive authority.修订后的 2019 年精神药理学培训标准:精神药理学处方权的示范教育和培训计划。
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):154-164. doi: 10.1037/amp0000729. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
8
Opposition to prescriptive authority: is this a case of the tail wagging the dog?对处方权的反对:这是本末倒置的情况吗?
J Clin Psychol. 2002 Jun;58(6):623-33. doi: 10.1002/jclp.10060.
9
Prescriptive authority for psychologists.心理学家的规定权限。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:21-47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-090209-151448.
10
Evaluating the impact of prescriptive authority for psychologists on the rate of deaths attributed to mental illness.评估心理学家的规定性权力对归因于精神疾病的死亡率的影响。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Apr;19(4):667-672. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.12.006. Epub 2022 Dec 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Psychologists' Intentions to Become Licensed Prescribers in Pennsylvania Using the Theory of Planned Behavior.运用计划行为理论评估宾夕法尼亚州心理学家成为持牌处方医生的意向。
Prof Psychol Res Pr. 2024 Aug;55(4):324-335. doi: 10.1037/pro0000575.
2
Factors Associated With Psychotherapist and Psychiatrist Participation in Public Insurance: Evidence From Georgia State.心理治疗师和精神科医生参与公共保险的相关因素:来自佐治亚州的证据。
Med Care. 2025 Feb 1;63(2):117-122. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002099. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
3
Assessing the safety and efficacy of prescribing psychologists in New Mexico and Louisiana.
评估新墨西哥州和路易斯安那州执业心理学家的安全性和有效性。
Am Psychol. 2024 Jul 25. doi: 10.1037/amp0001373.
4
Scope-of-Practice Expansions Associated with Reduced Racial Disparities in Pediatric Mental Health Care.实践范围的扩大与儿科心理健康护理中种族差异的减少有关。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Nov;60(8):1579-1588. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01310-6. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
5
Demographics and clinical characteristics of patients of prescribing psychologists, psychiatrists, and primary care physicians.开具处方的心理学家、精神科医生和初级保健医生的患者人口统计学和临床特征。
Am Psychol. 2024 Apr 18. doi: 10.1037/amp0001352.
6
Pediatric Mental Health Care and Scope-of-Practice Expansions.儿科心理健康保健和执业范围扩大。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2024 May;51(3):384-392. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01342-w. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
7
Federal pharmacist Paxlovid prescribing authority: A model policy or impediment to optimal care?联邦药剂师开具帕罗韦德(Paxlovid)的处方权:一项模范政策还是优化治疗的障碍?
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Mar;9:100244. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100244. Epub 2023 Mar 14.