School of Public Health, Department of Occupational Health and Environmental Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Minerva Pediatr (Torino). 2022 Apr;74(2):202-212. doi: 10.23736/S2724-5276.21.06149-1.
Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of many diseases. However, the relevance between RDW and neonatal sepsis (NS) have not reached a consensus yet; the perform of RDW in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is still not clear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to estimate the significance of RDW in neonatal sepsis and the perform of RDW in diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.
We used Pubmed, Embase, Web of science, CNKI and Google academic database to find all articles that met the inclusion criteria until July 1, 2020.
Fifteen eligible studies involving 1362 newborns were included in the meta-analysis after two independent investigators read the title, abstract and full text in detail. The pooled result of this meta-analysis showed that RDW was significantly higher in the NS group than in the control group (WMD=3.224; 95%CI: 2.359-4.090, P<0.001). In addition, the overall pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR and DOR were 0.88 (95%CI:0.66-0.96), 0.90 (95%CI:0.65-0.98), 9.2 (95%CI:2.1-40.3), 0.14(95%CI:0.04-0.43) and 66.9 (95%CI:8.73-513.26), respectively. The area under the SROC curve (AUC) was 0.95 (95%CI:0.93-0.96).
The meta-analysis demonstrated that newborns with sepsis had an elevated RDW level than healthy controls. RDW levels have significant correlated with neonatal sepsis; and RDW can be used as a cheap and satisfactory diagnostic biomarker for neonatal sepsis with a relatively high performance.
红细胞分布宽度(RDW)是许多疾病诊断和预后的生物标志物。然而,RDW 与新生儿败血症(NS)之间的相关性尚未达成共识;RDW 在新生儿败血症诊断中的作用仍不清楚。本荟萃分析的目的是评估 RDW 在新生儿败血症中的意义以及 RDW 在诊断新生儿败血症中的作用。
我们使用 Pubmed、Embase、Web of science、CNKI 和 Google 学术数据库,查找符合纳入标准的所有文章,截至 2020 年 7 月 1 日。
两名独立的研究者详细阅读标题、摘要和全文后,共有 15 项符合纳入标准的研究纳入荟萃分析。本荟萃分析的汇总结果表明,NS 组的 RDW 明显高于对照组(WMD=3.224;95%CI:2.359-4.090,P<0.001)。此外,总合并敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR 和 DOR 分别为 0.88(95%CI:0.66-0.96)、0.90(95%CI:0.65-0.98)、9.2(95%CI:2.1-40.3)、0.14(95%CI:0.04-0.43)和 66.9(95%CI:8.73-513.26)。SROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.95(95%CI:0.93-0.96)。
荟萃分析表明,败血症新生儿的 RDW 水平高于健康对照组。RDW 水平与新生儿败血症显著相关;RDW 可作为一种廉价且令人满意的新生儿败血症诊断生物标志物,具有较高的性能。