• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不遵守 COVID-19 防控行为:全爱尔兰电话调查结果。

Non-adherence to COVID-19 containment behaviours: results from an all-Ireland telephone survey.

机构信息

School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, 18-30 Malone Road, Belfast, BT9 5BN, UK.

Discipline of Public Health and Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, Trinity College Dublin, Tallaght Cross, Dublin, D24 DH74, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2022 May 5;22(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13322-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-022-13322-6
PMID:35513803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9070967/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 public health measures like handwashing and social distancing can help stem the spread of the virus. Adherence to guidelines varies between individuals. This study aims to identify predictors of non-adherence to social distancing and handwashing guidelines.

METHODS

A cross-sectional weekly telephone survey was conducted over eight weeks (11/06/2020-05/08/2020). The sample included adults resident on the island of Ireland (75:25 split between ROI and NI). Data were collected on demographics, threat perceptions, fear of COVID-19, response efficacy and self-efficacy, response cost and social norms, COVID-19 behaviours, mood, loneliness, and self-reported health.

RESULTS

3011 participants were surveyed. Handwashing non-adherers were more likely to be male (OR: 5.2, 95% CI: 2.4 - 11.3), to have higher levels of loneliness (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.1 - 3.1), and higher perceptions of handwashing costs (OR: 3.4, 95% CI: 2.2 - 5.2). Those reporting rarely engaging in social distancing were more likely to be members of lower socioeconomic groups, to be younger (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.96 - 0.98), male (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.1 - 2.5), healthcare workers (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.1 - 3.4), to report lower mood (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.3 - 2.2), were less likely to live in households with people aged under-18 (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.6 - 0.9), and to have lower fear of COVID-19 (OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.6 - 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-adherers to handwashing differ to social distancing non-adherers. Public health messages should target specific demographic groups and different messages are necessary to improve adherence to each behaviour.

摘要

背景

洗手和保持社交距离等 COVID-19 公共卫生措施有助于阻止病毒传播。个人对指南的遵守情况各不相同。本研究旨在确定不遵守社交距离和洗手指南的预测因素。

方法

在八周(2020 年 11 月 6 日至 2020 年 5 月 8 日)期间进行了一项横断面每周电话调查。样本包括居住在爱尔兰岛的成年人(ROI 和 NI 之间的比例为 75:25)。收集了人口统计学、威胁感知、对 COVID-19 的恐惧、反应效能和自我效能、反应成本和社会规范、COVID-19 行为、情绪、孤独和自我报告的健康数据。

结果

对 3011 名参与者进行了调查。不遵守洗手规定的人更有可能是男性(OR:5.2,95%CI:2.4-11.3),孤独感更高(OR:1.86,95%CI:1.1-3.1),洗手成本感知更高(OR:3.4,95%CI:2.2-5.2)。那些报告很少进行社交距离的人更有可能属于较低的社会经济群体,年龄更小(OR:0.97,95%CI:0.96-0.98),男性(OR:1.67,95%CI:1.1-2.5),医护人员(OR:1.98,95%CI:1.1-3.4),情绪较低(OR:1.72,95%CI:1.3-2.2),更不可能与 18 岁以下的人同住(OR:0.75,95%CI:0.6-0.9),对 COVID-19 的恐惧程度较低(OR:0.79,95%CI:0.6-0.9)。

结论

不遵守洗手规定的人与不遵守社交距离规定的人不同。公共卫生信息应针对特定的人群,并且需要不同的信息来提高对每种行为的遵守程度。

相似文献

1
Non-adherence to COVID-19 containment behaviours: results from an all-Ireland telephone survey.不遵守 COVID-19 防控行为:全爱尔兰电话调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 5;22(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13322-6.
2
Socio-demographic, social, cognitive, and emotional correlates of adherence to physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study.社会人口统计学、社会、认知和情感因素与 COVID-19 大流行期间遵守身体距离的相关性:一项横断面研究。
Can J Public Health. 2021 Feb;112(1):17-28. doi: 10.17269/s41997-020-00457-5. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
3
Influence of Health Beliefs on Adherence to COVID-19 Preventative Practices: International, Social Media-Based Survey Study.健康信念对COVID-19预防措施依从性的影响:基于社交媒体的国际调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 26;23(2):e23720. doi: 10.2196/23720.
4
Threat, Coping, and Social Distance Adherence During COVID-19: Cross-Continental Comparison Using an Online Cross-Sectional Survey.新冠疫情期间的威胁、应对措施及社交距离遵守情况:基于在线横断面调查的跨大陆比较
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 18;22(11):e23019. doi: 10.2196/23019.
5
Study protocol for the COvid-19 Toolbox for All IslaNd (CONTAIN) project: A cross-border analysis in Ireland to disentangle psychological, behavioural, media and governmental responses to COVID-19.“全岛新冠疫情应对工具箱(CONTAIN)项目”研究方案:爱尔兰的一项跨境分析,旨在厘清对新冠疫情的心理、行为、媒体及政府应对措施。
HRB Open Res. 2021 Feb 15;3:48. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13105.2. eCollection 2020.
6
Factors associated with non-adherence to social distancing rules during the COVID-19 pandemic: a logistic regression analysis.与 COVID-19 大流行期间不遵守社交距离规则相关的因素:逻辑回归分析。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 13;21(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10379-7.
7
Social inequalities in protective behaviour uptake at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a national survey.新冠大流行初期保护行为采纳的社会不平等:一项全国性调查的结果。
Can J Public Health. 2021 Oct;112(5):818-830. doi: 10.17269/s41997-021-00553-0. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
COVID-19 risk factors and predictors for handwashing, masking, and social distancing among a national prospective cohort of US older adults.COVID-19 风险因素以及美国老年人群体前瞻性队列研究中手卫生、戴口罩和保持社交距离的预测因素。
Public Health. 2022 Oct;211:164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 18.
9
Public Preferences for Social Distancing Policy Measures to Mitigate the Spread of COVID-19 in Missouri.公众对密苏里州采取社会疏离政策措施以减缓 COVID-19 传播的偏好。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2116113. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.16113.
10
Facilitators and barriers to social distancing for young people during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间年轻人保持社交距离的促进因素和障碍。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 4;22(1):891. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13325-3.

引用本文的文献

1
How does loneliness "get under the skin" to become biologically embedded?孤独感是如何“深入骨髓”并在生物学上扎根的?
Biodemography Soc Biol. 2023 Oct-Dec;68(4):115-148. doi: 10.1080/19485565.2023.2260742. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
2
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of questionnaires on adherence to physical distancing and health beliefs about COVID-19 in the general population.韩国版一般人群中关于遵守物理距离和对 COVID-19 的健康信念问卷的心理测量特性。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 6;14:1132169. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1132169. eCollection 2023.
3
Predictors for adherent behavior in the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional telephone survey.《COVID-19 大流行期间坚持行为的预测因素:一项横断面电话调查》。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;10:894128. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.894128. eCollection 2022.
4
Stepping into the shoes of the policy maker: Results of a Participatory Value Evaluation for the Dutch long term COVID-19 strategy.穿上政策制定者的鞋子:荷兰长期 COVID-19 战略的参与式价值评估结果。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;314:115430. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115430. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of the protection motivation theory for predicting COVID-19 preventive behaviors in Hormozgan, Iran: a cross-sectional study.应用保护动机理论预测伊朗霍尔木兹甘省的 COVID-19 预防行为:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 8;21(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10500-w.
2
Study protocol for the COvid-19 Toolbox for All IslaNd (CONTAIN) project: A cross-border analysis in Ireland to disentangle psychological, behavioural, media and governmental responses to COVID-19.“全岛新冠疫情应对工具箱(CONTAIN)项目”研究方案:爱尔兰的一项跨境分析,旨在厘清对新冠疫情的心理、行为、媒体及政府应对措施。
HRB Open Res. 2021 Feb 15;3:48. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13105.2. eCollection 2020.
3
Some at Risk for COVID-19 Are Reluctant to Take Precautions, but Others Are Not: A Case From Rural in Southern Iran.一些有感染 COVID-19 风险的人不愿意采取预防措施,但其他人则并非如此:伊朗南部农村地区的一个案例。
Front Public Health. 2020 Nov 16;8:562300. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.562300. eCollection 2020.
4
Protection Motivation and the COVID-19 Virus.保护动机与新冠病毒
Health Commun. 2021 Jan;36(1):15-22. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1847448. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
5
Association of poor housing conditions with COVID-19 incidence and mortality across US counties.美国各县不良住房条件与 COVID-19 发病率和死亡率的关系。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 2;15(11):e0241327. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241327. eCollection 2020.
6
Changes in risk perception and self-reported protective behaviour during the first week of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国新冠疫情大流行第一周期间风险认知及自我报告的防护行为变化
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Sep 16;7(9):200742. doi: 10.1098/rsos.200742. eCollection 2020 Sep.
7
Says who? The significance of sampling in mental health surveys during COVID-19.谁说的?COVID-19期间心理健康调查中抽样的重要性。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;7(7):567-568. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30237-6. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
COVID-19 Worries and Behavior Changes in Older and Younger Men and Women.新冠疫情下老年男性、老年女性、年轻男性和年轻女性的担忧和行为变化。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Jan 18;76(2):e17-e23. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa068.
9
Gender Differences in Patients With COVID-19: Focus on Severity and Mortality.COVID-19 患者的性别差异:关注严重程度和死亡率。
Front Public Health. 2020 Apr 29;8:152. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152. eCollection 2020.
10
Factors associated with preventive behaviours of COVID-19 among hospital staff in Iran in 2020: an application of the Protection Motivation Theory.2020 年伊朗医院工作人员中与 COVID-19 预防行为相关的因素:保护动机理论的应用。
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Jul;105(3):430-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.04.035. Epub 2020 Apr 28.