Institute of General Practice and Evidence Based Health Services Research, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Institute of General Practice, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 20;10:894128. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.894128. eCollection 2022.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, protective measures have been prescribed to prevent or slow down the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and protect the population. Individuals follow these measures to varying degrees. We aimed to identify factors influencing the extent to which protective measures are adhered to.
A cross-sectional survey (telephone interviews) was undertaken between April and June 2021 to identify factors influencing the degree to which individuals adhere to protective measures. A representative sample of 1,003 people (age >16 years) in two Austrian states (Carinthia, Vorarlberg) was interviewed. The questionnaire was based on the Health Belief Model, but also included potential response-modifying factors. Predictors for adherent behavior were identified using multiple regression analysis. All predictors were standardized so that regression coefficients (β) could be compared.
Overall median adherence was 0.75 (IQR: 0.5-1.0). Based on a regression model, the following variables were identified as significant in raising adherence: higher age (β = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.33-0.54), social standards of acceptable behavior (β = 0.33, 95%CI: 0.27-0.40), subjective/individual assessment of an increased personal health risk (β = 0.12, 95%CI: 0.05-0.18), self-efficacy (β = 0.06, 95%CI: 0.02-0.10), female gender (β = 0.05, 95%CI: 0.01-0.08), and low corona fatigue (behavioral fatigue: β = -0.11, 95%CI: -0.18 to -0.03). The model showed that such aspects as personal trust in institutions, perceived difficulties in adopting health-promoting measures, and individual assessments of the risk of infection, had no significant influence.
This study reveals that several factors significantly influence adherence to measures aimed at controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. To enhance adherence, the government, media, and other relevant stakeholders should take the findings into consideration when formulating policy. By developing social standards and promoting self-efficacy, individuals can influence the behavior of others and contribute toward coping with the pandemic.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,已规定了保护措施以预防或减缓 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的传播并保护人群。个人对这些措施的遵守程度各不相同。我们旨在确定影响个人遵守保护措施程度的因素。
2021 年 4 月至 6 月期间进行了一项横断面调查(电话访谈),以确定影响个人遵守保护措施程度的因素。在奥地利的两个州(卡林西亚州、福拉尔贝格州),对 1003 名年龄超过 16 岁的人进行了代表性抽样调查。调查问卷基于健康信念模型,但也纳入了潜在的反应修正因素。使用多元回归分析确定了遵行性行为的预测因子。所有预测因子均进行了标准化,以便比较回归系数(β)。
总体中位数遵行率为 0.75(IQR:0.5-1.0)。基于回归模型,以下变量被确定为提高遵行率的重要因素:年龄较大(β=0.43,95%CI:0.33-0.54)、社会认可的可接受行为标准(β=0.33,95%CI:0.27-0.40)、个人对健康风险增加的主观/个体评估(β=0.12,95%CI:0.05-0.18)、自我效能(β=0.06,95%CI:0.02-0.10)、女性(β=0.05,95%CI:0.01-0.08)和低冠状病毒疲劳(行为疲劳:β=-0.11,95%CI:-0.18 至-0.03)。该模型表明,个人对机构的信任、采取促进健康措施的难度以及对感染风险的个体评估等方面没有显著影响。
本研究表明,有几个因素显著影响控制 COVID-19 大流行的措施的遵行率。为了提高遵行率,政府、媒体和其他利益相关者在制定政策时应考虑到这些发现。通过制定社会标准和提高自我效能,个人可以影响他人的行为,并为应对大流行做出贡献。