Suppr超能文献

比较疾病预防控制中心用于应对 COVID-19 的国家脆弱性指数。

Comparison of National Vulnerability Indices Used by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the COVID-19 Response.

机构信息

COVID-19 Response Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Biostatistics and Computational Biology Branch, National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

出版信息

Public Health Rep. 2022 Jul-Aug;137(4):803-812. doi: 10.1177/00333549221090262. Epub 2022 May 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Vulnerability indices use quantitative indicators and geospatial data to examine the level of vulnerability to morbidity in a community. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses 3 indices for the COVID-19 response: the CDC Social Vulnerability Index (CDC-SVI), the US COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI), and the Pandemic Vulnerability Index (PVI). The objective of this review was to describe these tools and explain the similarities and differences between them.

METHODS

We described the 3 indices, outlined the underlying data sources and metrics for each, and discussed their use by CDC for the COVID-19 response. We compared the percentile score for each county for each index by calculating Spearman correlation coefficients (Spearman ).

RESULTS

These indices have some, but not all, component metrics in common. The CDC-SVI is a validated metric that estimates social vulnerability, which comprises the underlying population-level characteristics that influence differences in health risk among communities. To address risk specific to the COVID-19 pandemic, the CCVI and PVI build on the CDC-SVI and include additional variables. The 3 indices were highly correlated. Spearman for comparisons between the CDC-SVI score and the CCVI and between the CCVI and the PVI score was 0.83. Spearman for the comparison between the CDC-SVI score and PVI score was 0.73.

CONCLUSION

The indices can empower local and state public health officials with additional information to focus resources and interventions on disproportionately affected populations to combat the ongoing pandemic and plan for future pandemics.

摘要

目的

脆弱性指数利用定量指标和地理空间数据来检查社区对发病率的脆弱程度。疾病控制与预防中心 (CDC) 使用 3 种指数来应对 COVID-19:CDC 社会脆弱性指数 (CDC-SVI)、美国 COVID-19 社区脆弱性指数 (CCVI) 和大流行脆弱性指数 (PVI)。本研究旨在描述这些工具,并解释它们之间的相似之处和差异。

方法

我们描述了这 3 种指数,概述了每种指数的潜在数据源和指标,并讨论了 CDC 在 COVID-19 应对中的使用情况。我们通过计算 Spearman 相关系数 (Spearman ) 来比较每个指数中每个县的百分位数得分。

结果

这些指数具有一些但不是所有的共同指标。CDC-SVI 是一种经过验证的衡量社会脆弱性的指标,它包含了影响社区健康风险差异的潜在人口水平特征。为了解决 COVID-19 大流行特有的风险,CCVI 和 PVI 建立在 CDC-SVI 的基础上,并包含了其他变量。这 3 种指数高度相关。CDC-SVI 评分与 CCVI 之间以及 CCVI 与 PVI 评分之间的 Spearman 为 0.83。CDC-SVI 评分与 PVI 评分之间的 Spearman 为 0.73。

结论

这些指数可以为地方和州公共卫生官员提供更多信息,以集中资源和干预措施,针对受影响不成比例的人群,应对当前的大流行并为未来的大流行做计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f745/9257512/4ab9bd44ef8d/10.1177_00333549221090262-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验