• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为即将毕业的医学生开发利用模拟技术应对医疗差错的公开披露策略:将思维模式和体验式学习与终身反思实践相联系。

Developing open disclosure strategies to medical error using simulation in final-year medical students: linking mindset and experiential learning to lifelong reflective practice.

作者信息

Lane Andrew Stuart, Roberts Christopher

机构信息

Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Dec 3;7(5):345-351. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000659. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000659
PMID:35515741
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8936528/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Open disclosure is a policy outlining how healthcare practitioners should apologise for mistakes, discussing them with the harmed parties. Simulation is a training and feedback method in which learners practise tasks and processes in lifelike circumstances. We explore how final-year medical students experience the learning of open disclosure.

METHODS

A qualitative study of final-year medical students who had been involved a high-fidelity simulation session based on open disclosure after medication error was conducted. Students were selected using purposive sampling. Focus groups illuminated their experiences and interpretation of simulated open disclosure experiences. The data were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis and supported two superordinate themes: (1) identifying learning needs; and (2) learning to say sorry.

RESULTS

The medical students constructed their learning in three different ways: negotiating environmental relationships; embracing challenge and stress; and achieving learning outcomes. The data reinforced the need for psychological safety, emphasised the need for emotional arousal and demonstrated the need for both individual and collective reflective learning. Our data linked the benefits of experiential learning to the development of growth mindset and Jarvis's theory.

CONCLUSIONS

The lived experience of the final-year medical student participants in this study reinforced the notions of continuous psychological safety and the need for emotional arousal during learning. Our data also demonstrated the variety of participant experiences when preparing to give open disclosure, reinforcing the need for facilitators to optimise learning for the whole group as well as the individuals, given that participants are at different parts of their learning cycle.

摘要

引言与目标

公开披露是一项政策,概述了医疗从业者应如何为错误道歉,并与受影响方讨论这些错误。模拟是一种培训和反馈方法,学习者在逼真的情境中练习任务和流程。我们探讨了医学专业最后一年的学生如何体验公开披露的学习过程。

方法

对参与过基于用药错误后公开披露的高保真模拟课程的医学专业最后一年学生进行了定性研究。采用目的抽样法选取学生。焦点小组阐明了他们对模拟公开披露经历的体验和解读。使用解释现象学分析对数据进行分析,得出两个上位主题:(1)确定学习需求;(2)学会道歉。

结果

医学生以三种不同方式构建他们的学习:协商环境关系;接受挑战和压力;实现学习成果。数据强化了心理安全的必要性,强调了情绪唤起的必要性,并证明了个人和集体反思学习的必要性。我们的数据将体验式学习的益处与成长型思维的发展以及贾维斯的理论联系起来。

结论

本研究中参与的医学专业最后一年学生的实际经历强化了持续心理安全的概念以及学习过程中情绪唤起的必要性。我们的数据还展示了准备进行公开披露时参与者经历的多样性,鉴于参与者处于学习周期的不同阶段,这强化了促进者为整个小组以及个体优化学习的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00e6/8936528/dc773d91b576/bmjstel-2020-000659f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00e6/8936528/dc773d91b576/bmjstel-2020-000659f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00e6/8936528/dc773d91b576/bmjstel-2020-000659f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing open disclosure strategies to medical error using simulation in final-year medical students: linking mindset and experiential learning to lifelong reflective practice.为即将毕业的医学生开发利用模拟技术应对医疗差错的公开披露策略:将思维模式和体验式学习与终身反思实践相联系。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Dec 3;7(5):345-351. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000659. eCollection 2021.
2
Phenomenological study of medical interns reflecting on their experiences, of open disclosure communication after medication error: linking rationalisation to the conscious competency matrix.医学实习生对用药错误后公开披露沟通经历的反思的现象学研究:将合理化与意识能力矩阵联系起来
BMJ Open. 2020 May 30;10(5):e035647. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035647.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Wow, woo, win"- Healthcare students' and facilitators' experiences of interprofessional simulation in three-dimensional virtual world: A qualitative evaluation study.哇,赢了——医疗保健专业学生和促进者在三维虚拟世界中进行跨专业模拟的体验:一项定性评估研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Oct;105:105018. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105018. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
6
Medical students' perceptions towards learning communication skills: a qualitative study following the 2-year training programme.医学生对学习沟通技巧的认知:一项为期两年培训项目后的定性研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2019 May 3;10:90-97. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5cbd.7e96.
7
From 'spectating' to 'spect-acting': medical students' lived experiences of online Forum Theatre training in consulting with domestic abuse victims.从“旁观”到“参与表演”:医学生在为家庭暴力受害者提供咨询时进行在线论坛剧场培训的亲身经历
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Apr 15;7(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00208-1.
8
Experiential Learning in a Gamified Pharmacy Simulation: A Qualitative Exploration Guided by Semantic Analysis.游戏化药房模拟中的体验式学习:基于语义分析的定性探索
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Apr 15;9(2):81. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9020081.
9
The lived experiences of intensive care nursing students exposed to a new model of high-fidelity simulation training: a phenomenological study.接触新型高仿真模拟训练模式的重症监护护理专业学生的真实体验:一项现象学研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Aug 30;20(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00667-3.
10
A Novel Web-Based Experiential Learning Platform for Medical Students (Learning Moment): Qualitative Study.一种面向医学生的新型基于网络的体验式学习平台(学习时刻):定性研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2018 Oct 17;4(2):e10657. doi: 10.2196/10657.

引用本文的文献

1
Unveiling the hidden struggle of healthcare students as second victims through a systematic review.揭示医疗学生作为第二受害者的隐藏困境:一项系统综述
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05336-y.
2
Psychometric properties of the Latino Students Patient Safety Questionnaire, Brazilian version.《拉丁裔学生患者安全问卷》巴西文版的心理测量学特性。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2023 Feb 6;76(2):e20210961. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0961. eCollection 2023.
3
Contextualised reflective competence: a new learning model promoting reflective practice for clinical training.

本文引用的文献

1
Medication errors in hospitalised children.住院儿童的用药错误。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Jan;50(1):71-7. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12412. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
2
Open disclosure: ethical, professional and legal obligations, and the way forward for regulation.公开披露:道德、专业和法律义务,以及监管的未来方向。
Med J Aust. 2013 May 6;198(8):445-8. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10734.
3
Case and commentary: using simulation to address hierarchy issues during medical crises.案例与评论:利用模拟解决医疗危机期间的层级问题。
情境化反思能力:一种新的学习模式,促进临床培训中的反思实践。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 30;22(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03112-4.
Simul Healthc. 2013 Feb;8(1):13-9. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318280b202.
4
Managing the delivery of bad news: an in-depth analysis of doctors' delivery style.管理坏消息的传递:对医生传递方式的深入分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 May;87(2):186-92. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
5
Medication errors: prescribing faults and prescription errors.用药差错:处方过失与处方错误。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Jun;67(6):624-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03425.x.
6
A comprehensive checklist for reporting the use of OSCEs.一份关于报告客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)使用情况的综合清单。
Med Teach. 2009 Feb;31(2):112-24. doi: 10.1080/01421590802578277.
7
There's no such thing as "nonjudgmental" debriefing: a theory and method for debriefing with good judgment.不存在“无判断”的汇报总结:一种运用明智判断进行汇报总结的理论与方法。
Simul Healthc. 2006 Spring;1(1):49-55. doi: 10.1097/01266021-200600110-00006.
8
Disclosing harmful medical errors to patients.向患者披露有害的医疗差错。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 28;356(26):2713-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra070568.
9
Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry.运用良好判断力进行汇报:将严格的反馈与真诚的询问相结合。
Anesthesiol Clin. 2007 Jun;25(2):361-76. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.007.
10
Open disclosure: the only approach to medical error.公开披露:医疗差错的唯一应对方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Feb;13(1):3-5. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.008631.