Uygur Abdullah Burak, Oktem Ece Ozdemir, Celik Selime
Department of Psychiatry, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey.
Department of Neurology, Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Antalya, Turkey.
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2022 Mar 28;56(1):96-106. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2021.75031. eCollection 2022.
The relationship between major depressive disorder (MDD) and, especially harm avoidance, self-directedness, and cooperativeness has been determined based on Cloninger's psychobiological personality model; there are not enough studies in the literature on the role of the subdimensions. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the patients with MDD and healthy controls in terms of temperament and character traits and especially subdimensions and thus to determine the role and predictive value of temperament and character subdimensions in major depression patients.
The sample of this cross-sectional study consisted of 105 participants, 65 of whom were MDD patients, and 40 healthy controls, who voluntarily agreed to participate in the study. Sociodemographic data form, temperament and character inventory, and Hamilton depression rating scale were administered to the participants.
Compared with healthy controls, patients with MDD had lower self-directedness (p<0.001), cooperativeness (p=0.017), persistence (p<0.001), self-transcendence (p=0.001), and higher harm avoidance (p<0.001) scores. While there was no significant difference in novelty seeking (p=0.774); it was determined that MDD patients got higher scores in "Impulsiveness" (p=0.013) and lower scores in "Exploratory excitability" (p=0.001) subscales. Reward dependence has been identified as the only personality trait that there was no significant difference between major depression patients and healthy controls (p=0.511). As a result of the logistic regression analysis performed to determine the predictors of temperament and character subdimensions in major depression patients, only three temperament and character traits "Fatigability, Purposefulness, and Spiritual Acceptance" were determined as significant predictors (p<0.001). Fatigability was determined to be a serious risk factor, increasing the probability of MDD 3.6 times (p<0.001); purposefulness and spiritual acceptance were found to be protective personality traits that together reduced the probability of MDD by 0.8 times (p<0.001).
This study shows that the risk of developing MDD is increased in individuals with low self-directedness, cooperativeness, persistence, and self-transcendence profiles, and whereas with prominent Harm avoidance personality traits. Therapeutic interventions, especially considering the temperament and character traits of "Fatigability, Purposefulness, and Spiritual Acceptance" determined in our study, may contribute positively to MDD treatment.
基于克隆宁格的心理生物学人格模型,已确定了重度抑郁症(MDD)与特别是回避伤害、自我导向和合作性之间的关系;但文献中关于这些维度的作用的研究还不够充分。因此,本研究的目的是比较MDD患者与健康对照者在气质和性格特征方面,特别是各维度方面的差异,从而确定气质和性格维度在重度抑郁症患者中的作用及预测价值。
本横断面研究的样本包括105名参与者,其中65名是MDD患者,40名是健康对照者,他们自愿同意参与研究。对参与者进行社会人口统计学数据表格、气质和性格量表以及汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表的评估。
与健康对照者相比,MDD患者的自我导向性得分较低(p<0.001)、合作性得分较低(p=0.017)、坚持性得分较低(p<0.001)、自我超越得分较低(p=0.001),而回避伤害得分较高(p<0.001)。虽然在寻求新奇方面没有显著差异(p=0.774);但发现MDD患者在“冲动性”子量表上得分较高(p=0.013),在“探索性兴奋性”子量表上得分较低(p=0.001)。奖赏依赖被确定为重度抑郁症患者与健康对照者之间唯一没有显著差异的人格特质(p=0.511)。在进行逻辑回归分析以确定重度抑郁症患者气质和性格维度的预测因素时,仅确定了三个气质和性格特质“易疲劳性、目的性和精神接纳性”为显著预测因素(p<0.001)。易疲劳性被确定为一个严重的风险因素,使患MDD的概率增加3.6倍(p<0.001);目的性和精神接纳性被发现是保护性人格特质,共同使患MDD的概率降低0.8倍(p<0.001)。
本研究表明,自我导向性、合作性、坚持性和自我超越性较低且回避伤害人格特质突出的个体患MDD的风险增加。特别是考虑到我们研究中确定的“易疲劳性、目的性和精神接纳性”的气质和性格特质的治疗干预,可能会对MDD治疗产生积极贡献。