• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy as a Triage Tool for Airway Compromise in Angioedema: A Retrospective Cohort Study.鼻咽喉镜检查作为血管性水肿气道受损的分诊工具:一项回顾性队列研究
Cureus. 2022 Apr 2;14(4):e23759. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23759. eCollection 2022 Apr.
2
Predicting airway risk in angioedema: staging system based on presentation.血管性水肿气道风险的预测:基于临床表现的分期系统。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Sep;121(3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70182-8.
3
Early versus late intubation on the outcome of intensive care unit-admitted COVID-19 patients at Addis Ababa COVID-19 treatment centers, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴新冠病毒治疗中心收治的新冠病毒疾病患者入住重症监护病房后早期与晚期插管对治疗结果的影响:一项多中心回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg Open. 2022 Oct;47:100561. doi: 10.1016/j.ijso.2022.100561. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Assessment of the addition of prehospital continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) to an urban emergency medical services (EMS) system in persons with severe respiratory distress.对城市紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统中为重度呼吸窘迫患者添加院前持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的评估。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;45(2):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.01.044. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
5
Substance use and inhalation injury in adult burn patients: retrospective study of the impact on outcomes.成年烧伤患者的物质使用与吸入性损伤:对预后影响的回顾性研究
Burns Trauma. 2019 Jun 4;7:15. doi: 10.1186/s41038-019-0152-5. eCollection 2019.
6
Validation of new trauma triage rules for trauma attending response to the emergency department.急诊科创伤主治医生应对新创伤分诊规则的验证
J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1153-8; discussion 1158-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00022.
7
Angioedema of the upper aerodigestive tract: risk factors associated with airway intervention and management algorithm.上呼吸道消化道血管性水肿:与气道干预及管理算法相关的危险因素
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Mar;4(3):239-45. doi: 10.1002/alr.21260. Epub 2014 Jan 10.
8
Emergency Department Intubations in Patients With Angioedema: A Report from the National Emergency Airway Registry.急诊部血管性水肿患者的插管:来自国家急诊气道登记处的报告。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Nov;61(5):481-488. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
9
A retrospective cohort study of short-stay admissions to the medical intensive care unit: Defining patient characteristics and critical care resource utilization.一项关于医学重症监护病房短期住院患者的回顾性队列研究:确定患者特征及重症监护资源利用情况。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022 Jul-Sep;12(3):127-132. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_6_22. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
10
Emergency Department Airway Management of Severe Angioedema: A Video Review of 45 Intubations.急诊科严重血管性水肿的气道管理:45例插管的视频回顾
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 May;69(5):635-639. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.027. Epub 2017 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Angioedema: Is ICU admission warranted? A single institution assessment.血管性水肿:是否需要入住重症监护病房?一项单机构评估。
J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2025 Jul 31;11(3):240-246. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2025-0023. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Respiratory allergies: Salicaceae sensitization (Review).呼吸道过敏:杨柳科致敏(综述)
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jun;21(6):609. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10041. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
2
Ultrasonography of the larynx: Novel use during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (Review).喉部超声检查:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的新用途(综述)
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Mar;21(3):273. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9704. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
3
Clinical Features and Outcomes Associated with Angioedema in the Emergency Department.急诊科血管性水肿的临床特征和转归。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 6;20(5):760-769. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.6.42852.
4
Evaluation and Management of Angioedema in the Emergency Department.急诊科血管性水肿的评估与管理。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;20(4):587-600. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.5.42650. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
5
Diagnosis and treatment of upper airway oedema caused by acute angio-oedema in the emergency department: a French consensus statement.急诊科急性血管性水肿所致上呼吸道水肿的诊断和治疗:法国共识声明。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;24(5):318-325. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000446.
6
A consensus parameter for the evaluation and management of angioedema in the emergency department.用于急诊科血管性水肿评估和管理的共识参数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Apr;21(4):469-84. doi: 10.1111/acem.12341.
7
Multicenter study of patients with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-induced angioedema who present to the emergency department.对因血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂诱发血管性水肿而前往急诊科就诊的患者进行的多中心研究。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Apr;100(4):327-32. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60594-7.
8
The role of fiberoptic nasopharyngoscopy in the management of the acute airway in angioneurotic edema.纤维鼻咽镜检查在血管性水肿急性气道管理中的作用
Laryngoscope. 2000 Dec;110(12):2016-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200012000-00007.
9
Predicting airway risk in angioedema: staging system based on presentation.血管性水肿气道风险的预测:基于临床表现的分期系统。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Sep;121(3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70182-8.
10
Epidemiological study of angioedema and ACE inhibitors.血管性水肿与血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂的流行病学研究。
Aust N Z J Med. 1996 Dec;26(6):777-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.1996.tb00624.x.

鼻咽喉镜检查作为血管性水肿气道受损的分诊工具:一项回顾性队列研究

Nasopharyngolaryngoscopy as a Triage Tool for Airway Compromise in Angioedema: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

作者信息

Gayen Shameek, Sinha Tejas, Dronamraju Veena, Lashari Bilal, Zhao Huaqing, Dhungana Santosh

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, USA.

Health Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2022 Apr 2;14(4):e23759. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23759. eCollection 2022 Apr.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.23759
PMID:35518546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9064709/
Abstract

Background Airway compromise and respiratory failure are feared complications of angioedema leading to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. However, few of these patients decompensate. There is a paucity of tools that predict airway compromise in patients with angioedema, and it is unclear if automatic triage to the ICU is warranted. We analyzed patients admitted to our tertiary center ICU with angioedema for "airway watch" to find a way to triage those at greatest risk of respiratory decompensation. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients with angioedema admitted to our ICU between 2017 and 2020. Data collected included demographics, comorbidities, nasopharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL) findings, need for intubation, and length of stay. Descriptive analysis and subsequent ANOVA or T-test statistical analysis was performed to determine the relationships between individual variables and outcomes. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test where applicable. Continuous variables were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test. Results Of 134 patients admitted to our ICU, 63 (47%) required intubation, primarily in the emergency department (92.1%). Of those who required intubation, 61.9% had abnormal NPL findings in contrast to 25.35% of patients who did not require intubation (p<0.0001). Normal NPL findings had a negative predictive value for requiring intubation of 86.5%. Abnormal NPL findings had a positive predictive value for requiring intubation of 68.4%. Conclusion While airway compromise is a serious complication of angioedema, there is scant evidence to support triage to the ICU for those not intubated immediately. The majority of patients with angioedema who required intubation had abnormal NPL findings, and the majority of those with normal NPL findings did not require intubation. This suggests that NPL findings in patients with angioedema can help with triage to the ICU.

摘要

背景

气道梗阻和呼吸衰竭是血管性水肿令人担忧的并发症,可导致患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)。然而,这些患者中很少有人会出现病情恶化。目前缺乏预测血管性水肿患者气道梗阻的工具,对于是否有必要将患者自动分诊至ICU也尚不明确。我们对入住我院三级中心ICU进行“气道观察”的血管性水肿患者进行了分析,以找到一种方法来分诊那些呼吸失代偿风险最高的患者。方法:我们对2017年至2020年间入住我院ICU的血管性水肿患者进行了回顾性研究。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、合并症、鼻咽喉镜检查(NPL)结果、插管需求和住院时间。进行描述性分析以及随后的方差分析或T检验统计分析,以确定各个变量与结果之间的关系。分类变量在适用时使用Pearson卡方检验或Fisher精确检验进行比较。连续变量使用Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较。结果:在我院ICU收治的134例患者中,63例(47%)需要插管,主要在急诊科(92.1%)。在需要插管的患者中,61.9%的NPL检查结果异常,而不需要插管的患者中这一比例为25.35%(p<0.0001)。NPL检查结果正常对需要插管的阴性预测值为86.5%。NPL检查结果异常对需要插管的阳性预测值为68.4%。结论:虽然气道梗阻是血管性水肿的严重并发症,但几乎没有证据支持对未立即插管的患者分诊至ICU。大多数需要插管的血管性水肿患者NPL检查结果异常,而大多数NPL检查结果正常的患者不需要插管。这表明血管性水肿患者的NPL检查结果有助于分诊至ICU。