Pandit Pooja N, Mallozzi Mark, Mohammed Rahed, McDonough Gregory, Treacy Taylor, Zahustecher Nathaniel, Yoo Erika J
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Jane and Leonard Korman Respiratory Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2022 Jul-Sep;12(3):127-132. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_6_22. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
Little is known about the mortality and utilization outcomes of short-stay intensive care unit (ICU) patients who require <24 h of critical care. We aimed to define characteristics and outcomes of short-stay ICU patients whose need for ICU level-of-care is ≤24 h compared to nonshort-stay patients.
Single-center retrospective cohort study of patients admitted to the medical ICU at an academic tertiary care center in 2019. Fisher's exact test or Chi-square for descriptive categorical variables, -test for continuous variables, and Mann-Whitney two-sample test for length of stay (LOS) outcomes.
Of 819 patients, 206 (25.2%) were short-stay compared to 613 (74.8%) nonshort-stay. The severity of illness as measured by the Mortality Probability Model-III was significantly lower among short-stay compared to nonshort-stay patients ( = 0.0001). Most short-stay patients were admitted for hemodynamic monitoring not requiring vasoactive medications (77, 37.4%). Thirty-six (17.5%) of the short-stay cohort met Society of Critical Care Medicine's guidelines for ICU admission. Nonfull-ICU LOS, or time spent waiting for transfer out to a non-ICU bed, was similar between the two groups. Hospital mortality was lower among short-stay patients compared to nonshort-stay patients ( = 0.01).
Despite their lower illness severity and fewer ICU-level care needs, short-stay patients spend an equally substantial amount of time occupying an ICU bed while waiting for a floor bed as nonshort-stay patients. Further investigation into the factors influencing ICU triage of these subacute patients and contributors to system inefficiencies prohibiting their timely transfer may improve ICU resource allocation, hospital throughput, and patient outcomes.
对于需要不到24小时重症监护的短期重症监护病房(ICU)患者的死亡率和医疗资源利用结果,人们了解甚少。我们旨在确定与非短期入住患者相比,需要ICU护理水平≤24小时的短期入住ICU患者的特征和结果。
对2019年在一所学术性三级医疗中心的内科ICU住院的患者进行单中心回顾性队列研究。对描述性分类变量采用Fisher精确检验或卡方检验,对连续变量采用t检验,对住院时间(LOS)结果采用Mann-Whitney双样本检验。
在819例患者中,206例(25.2%)为短期入住患者,613例(74.8%)为非短期入住患者。与非短期入住患者相比,短期入住患者中用死亡率概率模型III衡量的疾病严重程度显著更低(P = 0.0001)。大多数短期入住患者因不需要血管活性药物的血流动力学监测而入院(77例,37.4%)。短期入住队列中的36例(17.5%)符合危重病医学学会的ICU入院指南。两组之间的非全ICU住院时间,即等待转出到非ICU床位的时间相似。短期入住患者的医院死亡率低于非短期入住患者(P = 0.01)。
尽管短期入住患者疾病严重程度较低且对ICU护理的需求较少,但在等待普通病房床位时,他们占用ICU床位的时间与非短期入住患者相当。进一步研究影响这些亚急性患者ICU分诊的因素以及导致系统效率低下、阻碍他们及时转出的因素,可能会改善ICU资源分配、医院周转率和患者结局。