• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解影响英国新国家患者安全政策实施的因素:从“死亡学习”中吸取的教训。

Understanding the factors influencing implementation of a new national patient safety policy in England: Lessons from 'learning from deaths'.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research and Policy, 4906London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Jan;28(1):50-57. doi: 10.1177/13558196221096921. Epub 2022 May 6.

DOI:10.1177/13558196221096921
PMID:35521697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9850371/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A new patient safety policy, 'Learning from Deaths' (LfD), was implemented in 2017 in National Health Service (NHS) organisations in England. This study examined how contextual factors influenced the implementation of LfD policy and the ability of the programme to achieve its goals.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with key policymakers involved in the development of the policy, along with interviews with managers and senior clinicians in five NHS organisations responsible for implementing the policy at the local level. We also undertook non-participant observation of relevant meetings and documentary reviews of key organisation procedures and policies pertaining to LfD.

RESULTS

The study findings suggest several factors that hinder or support patient safety policy implementation at a local level. These include: (a) an organisation's capacity and capability to support data collation, analysis and synthesis, (b) the dissemination of the resulting information, (c) the learning culture and hence perceptions of the purpose of LfD within an organisation, and (d) the extent of engagement in cross-organisational approaches to learning.

CONCLUSIONS

Extra and intra-organisational contextual factors influence all stages of the policy implementation process from preparation and tracking to implementation support and review affecting its chances of success or failure. Successful adoption of a national patient safety policy within health care organisations can be informed by taking into consideration those factors.

摘要

目的

2017 年,英国国民保健署(NHS)组织实施了一项新的患者安全政策,即“从死亡中学习”(LfD)。本研究考察了情境因素如何影响 LfD 政策的实施以及该计划实现其目标的能力。

方法

对参与制定该政策的主要政策制定者进行了半结构化访谈,并对负责在当地实施该政策的五家 NHS 组织的经理和高级临床医生进行了访谈。我们还对相关会议进行了非参与观察,并对与 LfD 相关的组织程序和政策的关键文件进行了审查。

结果

研究结果表明,有几个因素会阻碍或支持患者安全政策在地方层面的实施。这些因素包括:(a)组织支持数据收集、分析和综合的能力和能力,(b)信息的传播,(c)学习文化以及组织内部对 LfD 目的的看法,以及(d)跨组织学习方法的参与程度。

结论

组织内外的情境因素会影响政策实施过程的所有阶段,从准备、跟踪到实施支持和审查,影响其成败的可能性。通过考虑这些因素,可以为医疗保健组织内成功采用国家患者安全政策提供信息。

相似文献

1
Understanding the factors influencing implementation of a new national patient safety policy in England: Lessons from 'learning from deaths'.了解影响英国新国家患者安全政策实施的因素:从“死亡学习”中吸取的教训。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Jan;28(1):50-57. doi: 10.1177/13558196221096921. Epub 2022 May 6.
2
Encouraging openness in health care: Policy and practice implications of a mixed-methods study in the English National Health Service.鼓励医疗保健领域的开放:一项在英国国民保健制度中进行的混合方法研究的政策和实践意义。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Jan;28(1):14-24. doi: 10.1177/13558196221109053. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
3
NHS 'Learning from Deaths' reports: a qualitative and quantitative document analysis of the first year of a countrywide patient safety programme.NHS《死亡学习》报告:全国患者安全计划实施第一年的定性和定量文献分析
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e046619. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046619.
4
A narrative account of the key drivers in the development of the Learning from Deaths policy.学习死亡政策制定过程中的关键驱动因素的叙述性说明。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021 Oct;26(4):263-271. doi: 10.1177/13558196211010850. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
5
Mixed methods evaluation of the Getting it Right First Time programme - improvements to NHS orthopaedic care in England: study protocol.首次正确执行计划的混合方法评估——对英格兰国民保健制度骨科护理的改进:研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2012-y.
6
A study of the implementation of patient safety policies in the NHS in England since 2000: what can we learn?自 2000 年以来,对英格兰国民保健制度中患者安全政策实施情况的研究:我们能从中吸取什么教训?
J Health Organ Manag. 2022 Mar 18;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/JHOM-02-2021-0073.
7
National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of 'Learning from Deaths' reporting in quality accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020.国家法定报告:甚至连勾选框都没有做到?2017-2020 年英格兰国民保健制度中质量账户内“从死亡中学习”报告的质量。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Feb;12(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002092.
8
Is knowledge and practice safer in England after the release of national guidance on the resuscitation of patients in mental health and learning disabilities?在发布关于精神健康和学习障碍患者复苏的国家指南后,英国的知识和实践是否更安全了?
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014;21(9):806-13. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12126. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
9
10
Making sense of evidence in management decisions: the role of research-based knowledge on innovation adoption and implementation in healthcare. study protocol.在管理决策中理解证据:基于研究的知识在医疗保健中的创新采用和实施的作用。研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 21;7:22. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-22.

引用本文的文献

1
How Were Patient Safety Incidents Responded to, Investigated, and Learned From Within the English National Health Service Before the Implementation of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework? A Rapid Review.在《患者安全事件应对框架》实施之前,英国国家医疗服务体系是如何应对、调查和从中吸取教训的?一项快速综述。
J Patient Saf. 2025 Aug 1;21(5):e42-e55. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001349. Epub 2025 May 9.
2
Professionalising patient safety? Findings from a mixed-methods formative evaluation of the patient safety specialist role in the English National Health Service.使患者安全专业化?对英国国民医疗服务体系中患者安全专家角色的混合方法形成性评估结果
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2025 Jan;30(1):40-51. doi: 10.1177/13558196241268441. Epub 2024 Aug 2.

本文引用的文献

1
A narrative account of the key drivers in the development of the Learning from Deaths policy.学习死亡政策制定过程中的关键驱动因素的叙述性说明。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021 Oct;26(4):263-271. doi: 10.1177/13558196211010850. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
2
Contextual factors influencing the implementation of innovations in community-based primary health care: the experience of 12 Canadian research teams.影响社区初级卫生保健创新实施的背景因素:12个加拿大研究团队的经验
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jun 28;20:e107. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000483.
3
Creating a purpose-driven learning and improving health system: The Johns Hopkins Medicine quality and safety experience.打造一个目标驱动型学习与改善医疗体系:约翰·霍普金斯医学院的质量与安全经验。
Learn Health Syst. 2016 Dec 15;1(1):e10018. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10018. eCollection 2017 Jan.
4
Identifying positive deviants in healthcare quality and safety: a mixed methods study.识别医疗质量和安全中的正向离群者:一项混合方法研究。
J R Soc Med. 2018 Aug;111(8):276-291. doi: 10.1177/0141076818772230. Epub 2018 May 11.
5
Interaction between non-executive and executive directors in English National Health Service trust boards: an observational study.英国国家医疗服务体系信托委员会中非执行董事与执行董事之间的互动:一项观察性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Oct 15;15:470. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1127-2.
6
Ten challenges in improving quality in healthcare: lessons from the Health Foundation's programme evaluations and relevant literature.改善医疗保健质量的十大挑战:来自健康基金会项目评估和相关文献的经验教训。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Oct;21(10):876-84. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000760. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
7
What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions?哪些语境特征可能是患者安全实践干预有效性的重要决定因素?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jul;20(7):611-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049379. Epub 2011 May 26.
8
Multidisciplinary centres for safety and quality improvement: learning from climate change science.多学科安全和质量改进中心:从气候变化科学中学习。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i73-8. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.047985.
9
The hospital standardised mortality ratio: a powerful tool for Dutch hospitals to assess their quality of care?医院标准化死亡率:荷兰医院评估医疗质量的有力工具?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Feb;19(1):9-13. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2009.032953.
10
Evaluating and implementing new services.评估并实施新服务。
BMJ. 2006 Jan 14;332(7533):109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7533.109.