• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

打造一个目标驱动型学习与改善医疗体系:约翰·霍普金斯医学院的质量与安全经验。

Creating a purpose-driven learning and improving health system: The Johns Hopkins Medicine quality and safety experience.

作者信息

Pronovost Peter J, Mathews Simon C, Chute Christopher G, Rosen Antony

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland.

出版信息

Learn Health Syst. 2016 Dec 15;1(1):e10018. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10018. eCollection 2017 Jan.

DOI:10.1002/lrh2.10018
PMID:31245554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6516722/
Abstract

Health care has often relied on independent silos of medical research to drive progress and innovation. However, this approach does not adequately address the complexities and opportunities within the modern health care environment. We posit that creating a learning and improving health system that is purpose-driven will ultimately lead the next transformation in health care. We share the experience within Johns Hopkins Medicine that established a learning and improving health system in quality and safety. The system is built around a clear and compelling patient-centered purpose and leverages a fractal framework that provides horizontal links for peer learning and vertical links for accountability. It dismantles traditional research and clinical silos and combines basic and applied research with health system operations. As a result, the system aligns the goals and strengths of a diverse set of stakeholders including clinicians, patients, researchers, and administrators toward a common goal.

摘要

医疗保健常常依赖于独立的医学研究孤岛来推动进步和创新。然而,这种方法并不能充分应对现代医疗保健环境中的复杂性和机遇。我们认为,创建一个以目标为导向、不断学习和改进的医疗体系将最终引领医疗保健的下一次变革。我们分享约翰·霍普金斯医学中心建立质量与安全方面的学习和改进医疗体系的经验。该体系围绕明确且引人注目的以患者为中心的目标构建,并利用一个分形框架,该框架提供横向的同行学习链接和纵向的问责链接。它打破了传统的研究和临床孤岛,将基础研究与应用研究与医疗体系运营相结合。结果,该体系使包括临床医生、患者、研究人员和管理人员在内的各种利益相关者的目标和优势朝着一个共同目标保持一致。

相似文献

1
Creating a purpose-driven learning and improving health system: The Johns Hopkins Medicine quality and safety experience.打造一个目标驱动型学习与改善医疗体系:约翰·霍普金斯医学院的质量与安全经验。
Learn Health Syst. 2016 Dec 15;1(1):e10018. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10018. eCollection 2017 Jan.
2
Creating a Pediatric Joint Council to Promote Patient Safety and Quality, Governance, and Accountability Across Johns Hopkins Medicine.创建一个儿科联合委员会,以促进约翰霍普金斯医学中心的患者安全、质量、治理和问责制。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 May;43(5):224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
3
Creating a high-reliability health care system: improving performance on core processes of care at Johns Hopkins Medicine.创建高可靠性医疗体系:提升约翰·霍普金斯医疗核心护理流程的表现。
Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):165-72. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000610.
4
Sustaining Reliability on Accountability Measures at The Johns Hopkins Hospital.维持约翰霍普金斯医院问责措施的可靠性。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Feb;42(2):51-60. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42006-4.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
The Armstrong Institute: An Academic Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, Research, Training, and Practice.阿姆斯特朗研究所:一个专注于患者安全与质量改进、研究、培训和实践的学术机构。
Acad Med. 2015 Oct;90(10):1331-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000760.
7
A Department of Medicine Infrastructure for Patient Safety and Clinical Quality Improvement.一个用于患者安全和临床质量改进的医学部基础设施。
Am J Med Qual. 2018 Jul;33(4):413-419. doi: 10.1177/1062860617743324. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
Changing environment and the academic medical center: the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.不断变化的环境与学术医疗中心:约翰·霍普金斯医学院
Acad Med. 1989 Jan;64(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-198901000-00001.
9
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
10
Creating a fractal-based quality management infrastructure.创建基于分形的质量管理基础设施。
J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28(4):576-86. doi: 10.1108/jhom-11-2013-0262.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing the learning health system paradigm within academic health centers.在学术健康中心内实施学习型健康系统范式。
Learn Health Syst. 2023 Apr 13;8(1):e10367. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10367. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
Fairness for Whom? Learning Health Systems' Approach to Equity in Healthcare.为谁公平?学习健康系统在医疗保健中的公平方法。
Healthc Policy. 2023 Nov;19(2):15-20. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2023.27237.
3
Understanding Barriers to the Collection of Mobile and Wearable Device Data to Monitor Health and Cognition in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Management's Discussion and Analysis: A tool for advancing quality and safety.
Healthc (Amst). 2016 Sep;4(3):129-31. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
2
Re-examining high reliability: actively organising for safety.重新审视高可靠性:积极组织以确保安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):248-251. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004698. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
3
Clinical Communities at Johns Hopkins Medicine: An Emerging Approach to Quality Improvement.约翰霍普金斯医学院的临床社区:一种质量改进的新方法。
了解老年人收集移动和可穿戴设备数据以监测健康和认知的障碍:一项范围综述。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2023 Jun 16;2023:186-195. eCollection 2023.
4
Making Diabetes Electronic Medical Record Data Actionable: Promoting Benchmarking and Population Health Improvement Using the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Portal.让糖尿病电子病历数据发挥作用:利用1型糖尿病交换质量改进门户促进基准化和改善人群健康。
Clin Diabetes. 2022 Winter;41(1):45-55. doi: 10.2337/cd22-0072. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
5
Evaluating clinician-led quality improvement initiatives: A system-wide embedded research partnership at Stanford Medicine.评估临床医生主导的质量改进计划:斯坦福医学中心的全系统嵌入式研究合作关系。
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Aug 23;6(4):e10335. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10335. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Learning health systems in low-income and middle-income countries: exploring evidence and expert insights.学习中低收入国家的学习型卫生系统:探索证据和专家见解。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Sep;7(Suppl 7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008115.
7
From "Invented here" to "Use it everywhere!": A Learning health system from bottom and/or top?从“本土发明”到“全球应用!”:自下而上和/或自上而下的学习型健康系统?
Learn Health Syst. 2022 Feb 9;6(3):e10307. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10307. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Understanding the factors influencing implementation of a new national patient safety policy in England: Lessons from 'learning from deaths'.了解影响英国新国家患者安全政策实施的因素:从“死亡学习”中吸取的教训。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2023 Jan;28(1):50-57. doi: 10.1177/13558196221096921. Epub 2022 May 6.
9
Clarifying the concept of a learning health system for healthcare delivery organizations: Implications from a qualitative analysis of the scientific literature.澄清医疗服务组织学习型健康系统的概念:基于科学文献定性分析的启示
Learn Health Syst. 2021 Jul 22;6(2):e10287. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10287. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
A framework for value-creating learning health systems.创造价值的学习健康系统框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Aug 9;17(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0477-3.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Sep;41(9):387-95. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41050-5.
4
The TeamSTEPPS Approach to Safety and Quality.团队策略与工具提升患者安全及医疗质量方法
J Pediatr Orthop. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(5 Suppl 1):S30-3. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000541.
5
The Armstrong Institute: An Academic Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, Research, Training, and Practice.阿姆斯特朗研究所:一个专注于患者安全与质量改进、研究、培训和实践的学术机构。
Acad Med. 2015 Oct;90(10):1331-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000760.
6
Creating a high-reliability health care system: improving performance on core processes of care at Johns Hopkins Medicine.创建高可靠性医疗体系:提升约翰·霍普金斯医疗核心护理流程的表现。
Acad Med. 2015 Feb;90(2):165-72. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000610.
7
Creating a fractal-based quality management infrastructure.创建基于分形的质量管理基础设施。
J Health Organ Manag. 2014;28(4):576-86. doi: 10.1108/jhom-11-2013-0262.
8
Defining equity in health.界定健康公平性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Apr;57(4):254-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.4.254.