• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较高和低招募社区诊所青少年和青年临床试验入组的障碍和促进因素。

Comparing Barriers and Facilitators to Adolescent and Young Adult Clinical Trial Enrollment Across High- and Low-Enrolling Community-Based Clinics.

机构信息

Institute of Health System Science, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.

Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2022 May 6;27(5):363-370. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac030.

DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyac030
PMID:35522559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9074986/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer are underrepresented on cancer clinical trials (CCTs), and most AYAs are treated in the community setting. Past research has focused on individual academic institutions, but factors impacting enrollment vary across institutions. Therefore, we examined the patterns of barriers and facilitators between high- and low-AYA enrolling community-based clinics to identify targets for intervention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted 34 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders employed used at National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) affiliate sites ("clinics"). Stakeholders (eg, clinical research associates, patient advocates) were recruited from high- and low-AYA enrolling clinics. We conducted a content analysis and calculated the percentage of stakeholders from each clinic type that reported the barrier or facilitator. A 10% gap between high- and low-enrollers was considered the threshold for differences.

RESULTS

Both high- and low-enrollers highlighted insufficient resources as a barrier and the presence of a patient eligibility screening process as a facilitator to AYA enrollment. High-enrolling clinics reported physician gatekeeping as a barrier and the improvement of departmental collaboration as a facilitator. Low-enrollers reported AYAs' uncertainty regarding the CCT process as a barrier and the need for increased physician endorsement of CCTs as a facilitator.

CONCLUSIONS

High-enrolling clinics reported more barriers downstream in the enrollment process, such as physician gatekeeping. In contrast, low-enrolling clinics struggled with the earlier steps in the CCT enrollment process, such as identifying eligible trials. These findings highlight the need for multi-level, tailored interventions rather than a "one-size-fits-all" approach to improve AYA enrollment in the community setting.

摘要

背景

癌症青少年和年轻成人(AYA)患者在癌症临床试验(CCT)中的代表性不足,大多数 AYA 患者在社区环境中接受治疗。过去的研究集中在个别学术机构,但影响入组的因素因机构而异。因此,我们研究了高和低 AYA 入组社区为基础的诊所之间的障碍和促进因素模式,以确定干预的目标。

材料和方法

我们对在国家癌症研究所社区肿瘤学研究计划(NCORP)附属机构(“诊所”)工作的利益相关者进行了 34 次半结构化访谈。利益相关者(例如临床研究助理、患者倡导者)是从高和低 AYA 入组诊所招募的。我们进行了内容分析,并计算了报告障碍或促进因素的每个诊所类型的利益相关者的百分比。高和低入组者之间 10%的差距被认为是差异的阈值。

结果

高和低入组者都强调资源不足是一个障碍,并且存在患者资格筛选过程是促进 AYA 入组的因素。高入组诊所报告医生把关是一个障碍,改善部门合作是一个促进因素。低入组诊所报告 AYA 对 CCT 过程的不确定性是一个障碍,需要增加医生对 CCT 的认可作为一个促进因素。

结论

高入组诊所报告了更多的障碍,如医生把关,这是入组过程中的下游障碍。相比之下,低入组诊所在 CCT 入组过程的早期阶段遇到了困难,例如确定合格的试验。这些发现强调需要采取多层次、量身定制的干预措施,而不是一刀切的方法,以提高社区环境中 AYA 的入组率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e46/9074986/f40527e2b89a/oyac030f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e46/9074986/d71dbeff9a19/oyac030f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e46/9074986/f40527e2b89a/oyac030f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e46/9074986/d71dbeff9a19/oyac030f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e46/9074986/f40527e2b89a/oyac030f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing Barriers and Facilitators to Adolescent and Young Adult Clinical Trial Enrollment Across High- and Low-Enrolling Community-Based Clinics.比较高和低招募社区诊所青少年和青年临床试验入组的障碍和促进因素。
Oncologist. 2022 May 6;27(5):363-370. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac030.
2
Barriers and Facilitators to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Trial Enrollment: NCORP Site Perspectives.青少年和青年癌症临床试验入组的障碍和促进因素:NCORP 站点观点。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Mar 22;5(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab027. eCollection 2021 Jun.
3
Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: Identifying opportunities for intervention.系统评价青少年和青年癌症患者参与临床试验的障碍和促进因素:确定干预机会。
Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):949-957. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32675. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Shared barriers and facilitators to enrollment of adolescents and young adults on cancer clinical trials.青少年和青年癌症临床试验入组的共同障碍和促进因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):3875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07703-5.
5
Barriers to Pediatric Oncologist Enrollment of Adolescents and Young Adults on a Cross-Network National Clinical Trials Network Supportive Care Cancer Clinical Trial.儿科肿瘤学家招募青少年和年轻成年人参与跨网络全国临床试验网络支持性护理癌症临床试验的障碍。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2022 Feb;11(1):117-121. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2021.0041. Epub 2021 May 13.
6
Creation of a quality improvement collaborative to address adolescent and young adult cancer clinical trial enrollment: ATAQI (AYA trial access quality initiative).创建一个质量改进协作组织,以解决青少年和年轻成人癌症临床试验入组问题:ATAQI(AYA 试验入组质量倡议)。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2023 Dec;47(6):100898. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100898. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
7
A prospective comparison of cancer clinical trial availability and enrollment among adolescents/young adults treated at an adult cancer hospital or affiliated children's hospital.在成人癌症医院或附属儿童医院接受治疗的青少年/青年癌症患者中,癌症临床试验的可及性和入组情况的前瞻性比较。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4064-4071. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31727. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
8
Enrollment of adolescents and young adults onto SWOG cancer research network clinical trials: A comparative analysis by treatment site and era.SWOG 癌症研究网络临床试验中青少年和年轻成年人的入组:按治疗部位和时代的对比分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Mar;9(6):2146-2152. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2891. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
9
A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators to adolescents and young adults' participation in cancer clinical trials: Oncologist and patient perspectives.一项关于青少年和青年参与癌症临床试验的障碍与促进因素的定性研究:肿瘤学家和患者的观点。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Apr;69(4):e29479. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29479. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
10
The Children's Oncology Group Adolescent and Young Adult Responsible Investigator Network: A New Model for Addressing Site-Level Factors Impacting Clinical Trial Enrollment.儿童肿瘤学组青少年及成年责任研究员网络:解决影响临床试验入组的现场因素的新模式。
J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2020 Aug;9(4):522-527. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2019.0139. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Guideline-concordant treatment among adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.青少年和年轻成人急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的指南一致性治疗
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Apr 30;9(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaf033.
2
Approach to Design and Evaluate Digital Tools to Enhance Young Adult Participation in Clinical Trials: Co-Design and Controlled Intercept Study.设计和评估数字工具以提高青年成人参与临床试验的方法:联合设计与对照拦截研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 11;27:e70852. doi: 10.2196/70852.
3
Closing the gap: proposing a socio-ecological framework to make cancer clinical trials more accessible, equitable, and acceptable to adolescents and young adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and Facilitators to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Trial Enrollment: NCORP Site Perspectives.青少年和青年癌症临床试验入组的障碍和促进因素:NCORP 站点观点。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Mar 22;5(3). doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab027. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Enrollment of adolescents and young adults onto SWOG cancer research network clinical trials: A comparative analysis by treatment site and era.SWOG 癌症研究网络临床试验中青少年和年轻成年人的入组:按治疗部位和时代的对比分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Mar;9(6):2146-2152. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2891. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: Identifying opportunities for intervention.
缩小差距:提出一个社会生态框架,使癌症临床试验对青少年和青年更易获得、更公平且更可接受。
Oncologist. 2024 Nov 4;29(11):918-921. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae257.
4
Children's Oncology Group 2023 blueprint for research: Adolescent and young adult oncology.儿童肿瘤学组 2023 年研究蓝图:青少年和青年肿瘤学。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2023 Sep;70 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):e30564. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30564. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
系统评价青少年和青年癌症患者参与临床试验的障碍和促进因素:确定干预机会。
Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):949-957. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32675. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Evidence-based strategies to increase vaccination uptake: a review.循证策略提高疫苗接种率:综述。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2020 Feb;32(1):151-159. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000843.
5
The Clinical Trials Gap for Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer: Recent Progress and Conceptual Framework for Continued Research.青少年和青年癌症患者的临床试验差距:近期进展与持续研究的概念框架
Curr Pediatr Rep. 2015 Jun;3(2):137-145. doi: 10.1007/s40124-015-0075-y. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
6
A prospective comparison of cancer clinical trial availability and enrollment among adolescents/young adults treated at an adult cancer hospital or affiliated children's hospital.在成人癌症医院或附属儿童医院接受治疗的青少年/青年癌症患者中,癌症临床试验的可及性和入组情况的前瞻性比较。
Cancer. 2018 Oct 15;124(20):4064-4071. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31727. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
7
Increased clinical trial enrollment among adolescent and young adult cancer patients between 2006 and 2012-2013 in the United States.2006 年至 2012-2013 年期间美国青少年和青年癌症患者临床试验入组率增加。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Jan;66(1):e27426. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27426. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
Perceptions and attitudes toward clinical trials in adolescent and young adults with cancer: a systematic review.癌症青少年和青年对临床试验的认知与态度:一项系统综述
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018 Jun 13;9:87-94. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S163121. eCollection 2018.
9
A prospective, observational cohort study comparing cancer clinical trial availability and enrollment between early adolescents/young adults and children.一项前瞻性、观察性队列研究,比较青少年/青年和儿童的癌症临床试验的可及性和入组情况。
Cancer. 2018 Mar 1;124(5):983-990. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31127. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
10
Development of a text messaging system to improve receipt of survivorship care in adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer.开发一种短信系统,以改善儿童癌症青少年及年轻成年幸存者的生存护理服务接收情况。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Aug;11(4):505-516. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0609-0. Epub 2017 Mar 31.