Department of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Neurosurgery. 2022 Jul 1;91(1):1-7. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002000. Epub 2022 May 10.
The flow of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has been described as a unidirectional system with the choroid plexus serving as the primary secretor of CSF and the arachnoid granulations as primary reabsorption site. This theory of neurosurgical forefathers has been universally adopted and taught as dogma. Many neuroscientists have found difficulty reconciling this theory with common pathologies, and recent studies have found that this "classic" hypothesis may not represent the full picture.
To review modern CSF dynamic theories and to call for medical education reform.
We reviewed the literature from January 1990 to December 2020. We searched the PubMed database using key terms "cerebrospinal fluid circulation," "cerebrospinal fluid dynamics," "cerebrospinal fluid physiology," "glymphatic system," and "glymphatic pathway." We selected articles with a primary aim to discuss either CSF dynamics and/or the glymphatic system.
The Bulat-Klarica-Orešković hypothesis purports that CSF is secreted and reabsorbed throughout the craniospinal axis. CSF demonstrates similar physiology to that of water elsewhere in the body. CSF "circulates" throughout the subarachnoid space in a pulsatile to-and-fro fashion. Osmolarity plays a critical role in CSF dynamics. Aquaporin-4 and the glymphatic system contribute to CSF volume and flow by establishing osmolarity gradients and facilitating CSF movement. Multiple studies demonstrate that the choroid plexus does not play any significant role in CSF circulation.
We have highlighted major studies to illustrate modern principles of CSF dynamics. Despite these, the medical education system has been slow to reform curricula and update learning resources.
脑脊液(CSF)的流动被描述为一个单向系统,脉络丛作为 CSF 的主要分泌者,蛛网膜颗粒作为主要的吸收部位。这一神经外科前辈的理论已被普遍接受并作为教条传授。许多神经科学家发现,很难将这一理论与常见的病理生理学相协调,最近的研究发现,这一“经典”假说可能无法代表全貌。
回顾现代 CSF 动力学理论,并呼吁医学教育改革。
我们回顾了 1990 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月的文献。我们使用“脑脊液循环”、“脑脊液动力学”、“脑脊液生理学”、“糖质系统”和“糖质途径”等关键词在 PubMed 数据库中进行检索。我们选择了主要旨在讨论 CSF 动力学和/或糖质系统的文章。
Bulat-Klarica-Orešković 假说认为 CSF 是在颅脊柱轴的各个部位分泌和吸收的。CSF 的生理学与身体其他部位的水相似。CSF 以脉冲式的来回方式在蛛网膜下腔中“循环”。渗透压在 CSF 动力学中起着关键作用。水通道蛋白-4 和糖质系统通过建立渗透压梯度和促进 CSF 运动,有助于 CSF 容量和流量。多项研究表明,脉络丛在 CSF 循环中不起任何重要作用。
我们强调了主要的研究,以说明现代 CSF 动力学的原理。尽管如此,医学教育系统在改革课程和更新学习资源方面一直进展缓慢。