Vose B M
Cancer Metastasis Rev. 1987;5(4):299-312. doi: 10.1007/BF00055375.
Data continues to accumulate on the immunological reaction against solid human cancers. The evidence at the present time supports the view that rather than being immunologically invisible, tumour cell antigens are recognised by at least three lymphocyte subsets. Helper T cells can be induced to proliferate upon exposure to cells of the autologous tumour and to secrete detectable levels of interleukin 2 (IL-2). Cultured T cell lines and clones can be shown to respond in primed lymphocyte tests not only to autologous tumour cells but also to allogeneic tumour cells of the same histology and anatomic location. Cytotoxic T cells manifest specific reactivity against cells of the autologous tumour which is distinguishable from natural killing (NK) on the basis of specificity and organ distribution. Natural killer cells can lyse freshly isolated autologous tumour cells after purification on Percoll gradients or when activated by IL-2. There is thus a demonstrable heterogeneity of response to human cancer in unseparated lymphocyte populations and at the clonal level. In limiting dilution assays lymphocytes at the tumour site respond more frequently to autologous tumour relative to NK targets. For at least some tumours there is evidence that the expression of auto-tumour reactivity but not NK correlates with the clinical course of the disease and is a favourable prognostic indicator. The finding of these auto-tumour reactivities has important implications for the search for immunomodulating drugs for cancer treatment. However, it must be recognised that the response is heterogeneous and that the immune system comprises multiple interactive elements that exhibit both positive and negative control. Any treatment modality must take this into account and seek to focus on specific activation of the tumour lytic populations or the inhibition of negative regulatory elements as opposed to seeking a more general augmentation of immune reactivity which may, by stimulating suppressor cells, have a counterproductive effect.
关于针对人类实体癌的免疫反应的数据持续积累。目前的证据支持这样一种观点,即肿瘤细胞抗原并非在免疫上不可见,而是至少被三个淋巴细胞亚群所识别。辅助性T细胞在接触自体肿瘤细胞后可被诱导增殖,并分泌可检测水平的白细胞介素2(IL-2)。培养的T细胞系和克隆在致敏淋巴细胞试验中不仅对自体肿瘤细胞有反应,而且对相同组织学和解剖位置的同种异体肿瘤细胞也有反应。细胞毒性T细胞对自体肿瘤细胞表现出特异性反应,这种反应在特异性和器官分布方面与自然杀伤(NK)不同。自然杀伤细胞在通过Percoll梯度纯化后或被IL-2激活时,可以裂解新鲜分离的自体肿瘤细胞。因此,在未分离的淋巴细胞群体和克隆水平上,对人类癌症的反应存在明显的异质性。在有限稀释试验中,肿瘤部位的淋巴细胞相对于NK靶标对自体肿瘤的反应更频繁。对于至少一些肿瘤,有证据表明自体肿瘤反应性而非NK的表达与疾病的临床进程相关,并且是一个有利的预后指标。这些自体肿瘤反应性的发现对寻找用于癌症治疗的免疫调节药物具有重要意义。然而,必须认识到这种反应是异质性的,并且免疫系统包含多个相互作用的元素,这些元素表现出正调控和负调控。任何治疗方式都必须考虑到这一点,并寻求专注于肿瘤溶解群体的特异性激活或负调控元件的抑制,而不是寻求更普遍地增强免疫反应性,因为刺激抑制细胞可能会产生适得其反的效果。