Suppr超能文献

在退行性腰椎滑脱症患者腰椎屈伸位X线片检查中,用于定位支撑以评估腰椎不稳的支点的效用。

Utility of a fulcrum for positioning support during flexion-extension radiographs for assessment of lumbar instability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

作者信息

Lin Fanguo, Zhou Zhiqiang, Li Zhiwei, Shan Bingchen, Zhou Zhentao, Sun Yongming, Zhou Xiaozhong

机构信息

1Department of Orthopedics and.

2Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 May 6;37(4):535-540. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.SPINE22192. Print 2022 Oct 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors investigated a new standardized technique for evaluating lumbar stability in lumbar lateral flexion-extension (LFE) radiographs. For patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis, a three-part fulcrum with a support platform that included a semiarc leaning tool with armrests, a lifting platform for height adjustment, and a base for stability were used. Standard functional radiographs were used for comparison to determine whether adequate flexion-extension was acquired through use of the fulcrum method.

METHODS

A total of 67 consecutive patients diagnosed with L4-5 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were enrolled in the study. The authors analyzed LFE radiographs taken with the patient supported by a fulcrum (LFEF) and without a fulcrum. Sagittal translation (ST), segmental angulation (SA), posterior opening (PO), change in lumbar lordosis (CLL), and lumbar instability (LI) were measured for comparison using functional radiographs.

RESULTS

The average value of SA was 5.76° ± 3.72° in LFE and 9.96° ± 4.00° in LFEF radiographs, with a significant difference between them (p < 0.05). ST and PO were also significantly greater in LFEF than in LFE. The detection rate of instability was 10.4% in LFE and 31.3% in LFEF, and the difference was significant. The CLL was 27.31° ± 11.96° in LFE and 37.07° ± 12.963.16° in LFEF, with a significant difference between these values (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with traditional LFE radiographs, the LFEF radiographs significantly improved the detection rate of LI. In addition, this method may reduce patient discomfort during the process of obtaining radiographs.

摘要

目的

作者研究了一种用于评估腰椎侧屈-后伸(LFE)X线片上腰椎稳定性的新标准化技术。对于腰椎滑脱患者,使用了一种三部分式支点及支撑平台,该平台包括带有扶手的半弧形倾斜工具、用于高度调节的升降平台和用于稳定的底座。使用标准功能X线片进行比较,以确定通过支点法是否获得了足够的屈伸。

方法

本研究共纳入67例连续诊断为L4-5退变性腰椎滑脱的患者。作者分析了在有支点支撑(LFEF)和无支点情况下拍摄的LFE X线片。使用功能X线片测量矢状面平移(ST)、节段成角(SA)、后开口(PO)、腰椎前凸变化(CLL)和腰椎不稳(LI)以进行比较。

结果

LFE X线片中SA的平均值为5.76°±3.72°,LFEF X线片中为9.96°±4.00°,两者之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。LFEF中的ST和PO也显著大于LFE。LFE中不稳的检出率为10.4%,LFEF中为31.3%,差异显著。LFE中CLL为27.31°±11.96°,LFEF中为37.07°±12.96°,这些值之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。

结论

与传统的LFE X线片相比,LFEF X线片显著提高了LI的检出率。此外,这种方法可能会减少获取X线片过程中患者的不适。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验