Clinical value of flexion-extension radiographs with bracket support for lumbar stability assessment.

OBJECTIVES

This study proposes a novel standardized technique to evaluate lumbar stability in lumbar lateral flexion-extension radiographs and determine whether the most reliable intraoperative reference level of extension can be attained.

METHODS

A total of 104 patients undergoing surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative disease were included in the study. Radiographs in the conventional extension position (CE) and the extension position with bracket support (CEB) and intraoperative prone fluoroscopic radiographs of patients were included in this study. The slip angle (SA) and slip percentage (SP) were compared for these three radiographic methods. Furthermore, the correlation of differences in the SA and SP were examined among different spinal segments.

RESULTS

Among 104 patients (mean age 58 years, 54% women) with a total of 147 operated segments examined, the average SA (10.65°±3.65°) and SP (12.18%±4.91%) with bracket support and SA (10.62°±3.67°) and SP (12.19%±4.90%) during intraoperative muscle relaxation were not significantly different (P=0.54; 0.91). However, the SA and SP in the CEB and intraoperative muscle relaxation conditions were significantly increased compared with the SA (6.46°±3.23°) and SP (7.87%±4.26%) obtained in the CE condition (all P<0.001). Both surgeons demonstrated high reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.8 to 1.0 (P<0.001) for SP and SA measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

CE radiographs underestimate the degree of displacement of lumbar instability. The CEB position reduces patient back pain and increases the feeling of safety, leading to a greater level of extension. This outcome aligns with the intraoperative muscle relaxation findings.