Rominger Christian, Schneider Martha, Fink Andreas, Tran Ulrich S, Perchtold-Stefan Corinna M, Schwerdtfeger Andreas R
Institute of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Department of Cognition, Emotion, and Methods in Psychology, School of Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sports Med Open. 2022 May 6;8(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00444-9.
Physical activity is a health-relevant lifestyle factor associated with various benefits on physical and mental health. Several meta-analyses indicated effects of acute and chronic physical activities on elementary cognitive functions such as executive control processes, memory, and attention. Meta-analytic evidence on the effects of physical activity on creative idea generation, which involves a conglomerate of these elementary cognitive functions, is largely missing.
A twofold approach was used to evaluate (1) if there is an association between habitual physical activity and creative ideation and (2) if physical activity interventions (acute and chronic) enhance creative ideation performance.
Multilevel meta-analytic methods were applied to (1) evaluate the cross-sectional association between creative ideation performance and measures of habitual physical activity and (2) the effect of physical activity on creative ideation performance. Indicators of creative ideation (fluency, flexibility, originality, elaboration, or composite score), creativity domain (verbal, figural), population (adults, children), gender, study quality, and publication year served as moderator variables for both meta-analyses. Analyses of intervention studies additionally examined the moderator variables study design (between, within), time of measurement (during, after), and implementation of intervention (acute, chronic).
The applied meta-analytic multilevel analysis indicated a medium effect for cross-sectional studies (r = 0.22, SE = 0.06, p = 0.002, 95% CI [0.10-0.34]) based on 17 effects sizes from seven studies. The pooled effects of 28 intervention studies, providing 115 effect sizes, indicated a medium effect size of Hedges' g = 0.47 (SE = 0.09, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.30-0.65]). Furthermore, a stronger effect was observed for chronic interventions of several days or weeks in comparison with acute interventions of one single bout.
This study adds important new meta-analytic evidence on the beneficial role of physical activity beyond mental and physical health outcomes: Physical activity has a positive impact on creative ideation, which expands the literature on the role of physical activity in more elementary cognitive functions such as executive control, memory, and attention. Moderator analyses suggested that chronic interventions showed stronger effects than single bouts of physical activity. Rigorously conducted randomized controlled intervention studies and more cross-sectional studies are needed to broaden the evidence in this nascent field of research.
身体活动是一种与健康相关的生活方式因素,对身心健康有诸多益处。多项荟萃分析表明,急性和慢性身体活动对基本认知功能有影响,如执行控制过程、记忆和注意力。然而,关于身体活动对创造性思维产生的影响的荟萃分析证据却大多缺失,而创造性思维产生涉及这些基本认知功能的综合作用。
采用双重方法来评估:(1)习惯性身体活动与创造性思维之间是否存在关联;(2)身体活动干预(急性和慢性)是否能提高创造性思维表现。
运用多层次荟萃分析方法来:(1)评估创造性思维表现与习惯性身体活动测量指标之间的横断面关联;(2)评估身体活动对创造性思维表现的影响。创造性思维指标(流畅性、灵活性、独创性、详尽性或综合得分)、创造力领域(言语、图形)、人群(成年人、儿童)、性别、研究质量和发表年份作为两项荟萃分析的调节变量。对干预研究的分析还额外考察了调节变量研究设计(组间、组内)、测量时间(期间、之后)以及干预实施方式(急性、慢性)。
基于来自7项研究的17个效应量,所应用的荟萃分析多层次分析表明横断面研究有中等效应(r = 0.22,标准误 = 0.06,p = 0.002,95%置信区间[0.10 - 0.34])。28项干预研究的合并效应,提供了115个效应量,表明Hedges' g的中等效应量为0.47(标准误 = 0.09,p < 0.001,95%置信区间[0.30 - 0.65])。此外,与单次急性干预相比,持续数天或数周的慢性干预观察到更强的效应。
本研究为身体活动在身心健康结果之外的有益作用增添了重要的新荟萃分析证据:身体活动对创造性思维有积极影响,这扩展了关于身体活动在诸如执行控制、记忆和注意力等更基本认知功能中作用的文献。调节分析表明,慢性干预比单次身体活动的效应更强。需要进行严格的随机对照干预研究和更多的横断面研究,以拓宽这个新兴研究领域的证据。