Suppr超能文献

三种上颌和下颌粘接式正畸保持器的生存分析:回顾性队列研究。

Survival analysis of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers: a retrospective cohort.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Shariati Street, Kermanshah, 67139546581, Iran.

Students Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Shariati Street, Kermanshah, 67139546581, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2022 May 6;22(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02202-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Retention is an important aspect of orthodontic treatment. This study aimed to analyze the survival of three types of maxillary and mandibular bonded orthodontic retainers.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated the records of 118 orthodontic patients (90 females, 28 males, mean age of 22.34 ± 6.44 years) retrieved from a private orthodontic office. Data regarding the retainer failure, dental caries, unwanted tooth movements, maximum pocket depth (PD), and bleeding on probing (BOP) recorded at the follow-up sessions were extracted from patient records. Three types of retainer wires namely Bond-A-Braid, Orthoflex, and Retainium were compared regarding the abovementioned parameters. Data were analyzed by ANOVA, Chi-square, Monte-Carlo Chi-square, and Kruskal Wallis tests, the log rank test, and the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The frequency of retainer failure was not significantly different between males and females, different age groups, or different treatment durations (P > 0.05). Wire fracture was the most common failure type in both the maxilla and mandible. Also, the frequency of failure was not significantly different between the maxillary and mandibular retainers (P > 0.05). The frequency of failure, and survival of the three types of retainer wires were not significantly different during a 5-year period (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The three types of orthodontic retainers had comparable survival rates. Their failure rate was not correlated with the age or gender of patients or the treatment duration.

摘要

背景

保持是正畸治疗的一个重要方面。本研究旨在分析三种上颌和下颌粘接式正畸保持器的存活率。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估了从一家私人正畸诊所获得的 118 名正畸患者(90 名女性,28 名男性,平均年龄 22.34±6.44 岁)的记录。从患者记录中提取了随访时记录的保持器失败、龋齿、牙齿意外移动、最大牙周袋深度(PD)和探诊出血(BOP)的数据。比较了三种保持器丝,即 Bond-A-Braid、Orthoflex 和 Retainium,比较了以上参数。采用方差分析、卡方检验、蒙特卡罗卡方检验、克鲁斯卡尔-沃利斯检验、对数秩检验和 Cox 回归模型进行数据分析。

结果

男性和女性、不同年龄组或不同治疗时间的保持器失败频率无显著差异(P>0.05)。丝断裂是上颌和下颌最常见的失败类型。此外,上颌和下颌保持器的失败频率无显著差异(P>0.05)。在 5 年期间,三种保持器丝的失败频率和存活率无显著差异(P>0.05)。

结论

三种正畸保持器的存活率相当。它们的失败率与患者的年龄、性别或治疗时间无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c27/9074306/f5ba50a22c3d/12903_2022_2202_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验