Department of Education, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Department of Education, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Br J Educ Psychol. 2022 Dec;92(4):1384-1402. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12506. Epub 2022 May 6.
Student perceptions of teachers' interpersonal closeness positively affect their emotions. If closeness is, however, effortful for the teacher (i.e., emotional labour, signalling less genuine closeness), this may undermine these positive effects. We tested this assumption by using student reports and external observations of teacher closeness and ambulant measures of teacher heart rate, to gauge teachers' physiological effort connected to being close during class.
We investigated the association between teachers' physiological effort connected to closeness and students' lesson-focused emotions.
75 teachers and their students (N = 1645) participated during one real-life lesson.
Teacher interpersonal closeness was continuously coded based on a video recording and teachers' heart rate was measured continuously as an indicator of physiological effort. Students reported their emotions and perception of teacher closeness at the end of the lesson.
Multilevel models with student emotions as DVs and students' perceptions of teacher warmth (L1 predictor) and teachers' physiological effort when being close (i.e., an intra-individual cross-correlation, L2 predictor) were tested. As expected, students reported more positive and less negative emotions when they perceived more teacher closeness. The physiological effort connected to being close was not directly associated with student emotions; however, such effort moderated the effect of perceived closeness, especially with regard to negative student emotions (i.e., cross-level interactions). The more effortful teacher closeness was, the less closeness protected students from negative emotions.
In line with extant research on faking enjoyment and emotional labour, students seemed to be affected when teacher closeness was physiologically effortful, and overall positive effects of teacher closeness were undermined.
学生对教师人际亲密感的认知会积极影响他们的情绪。然而,如果这种亲密感对教师来说是费力的(即情绪劳动,表明不那么真诚的亲密感),那么这可能会破坏这些积极影响。我们通过使用学生报告和对教师亲密感的外部观察以及教师心率的动态测量来检验这一假设,以衡量教师在课堂上接近学生时所付出的生理努力。
我们研究了教师与亲密感相关的生理努力与学生课程相关情绪之间的关联。
75 名教师及其学生(N=1645)在一节真实的课堂中参与了研究。
根据视频记录连续对教师的人际亲密感进行编码,并连续测量教师的心率,以作为接近时生理努力的指标。学生在课后报告他们的情绪和对教师亲密感的感知。
使用学生情绪作为因变量,学生对教师温暖的感知(L1 预测器)和教师接近时的生理努力(即个体内交叉相关,L2 预测器)的多层次模型进行了测试。正如预期的那样,当学生感知到更多的教师亲密感时,他们报告的积极情绪更多,消极情绪更少。与亲密感相关的生理努力与学生情绪没有直接关联;然而,这种努力调节了感知到的亲密感的效果,尤其是对消极的学生情绪(即交叉水平的相互作用)。教师亲密感越费力,亲密感对学生消极情绪的保护作用就越小。
与关于假装享受和情绪劳动的现有研究一致,当教师的亲密感需要付出生理努力时,学生似乎会受到影响,并且教师亲密感的整体积极影响会被破坏。