Kessler Ronald C, Kazdin Alan E, Aguilar-Gaxiola Sergio, Al-Hamzawi Ali, Alonso Jordi, Altwaijri Yasmin A, Andrade Laura H, Benjet Corina, Bharat Chrianna, Borges Guilherme, Bruffaerts Ronny, Bunting Brendan, de Almeida José Miguel Caldas, Cardoso Graça, Chiu Wai Tat, Cía Alfredo, Ciutan Marius, Degenhardt Louisa, de Girolamo Giovanni, de Jonge Peter, de Vries Ymkje Anna, Florescu Silvia, Gureje Oye, Haro Josep Maria, Harris Meredith G, Hu Chiyi, Karam Aimee N, Karam Elie G, Karam Georges, Kawakami Norito, Kiejna Andrzej, Kovess-Masfety Viviane, Lee Sing, Makanjuola Victor, McGrath John J, Medina-Mora Maria Elena, Moskalewicz Jacek, Navarro-Mateu Fernando, Nierenberg Andrew A, Nishi Daisuke, Ojagbemi Akin, Oladeji Bibilola D, O'Neill Siobhan, Posada-Villa José, Puac-Polanco Victor, Rapsey Charlene, Ruscio Ayelet Meron, Sampson Nancy A, Scott Kate M, Slade Tim, Stagnaro Juan Carlos, Stein Dan J, Tachimori Hisateru, Ten Have Margreet, Torres Yolanda, Viana Maria Carmen, Vigo Daniel V, Williams David R, Wojtyniak Bogdan, Xavier Miguel, Zarkov Zahari, Ziobrowski Hannah N
Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):272-286. doi: 10.1002/wps.20971.
Patient-reported helpfulness of treatment is an important indicator of quality in patient-centered care. We examined its pathways and predictors among respondents to household surveys who reported ever receiving treatment for major depression, generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, specific phobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, bipolar disorder, or alcohol use disorder. Data came from 30 community epidemiological surveys - 17 in high-income countries (HICs) and 13 in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) - carried out as part of the World Health Organization (WHO)'s World Mental Health (WMH) Surveys. Respondents were asked whether treatment of each disorder was ever helpful and, if so, the number of professionals seen before receiving helpful treatment. Across all surveys and diagnostic categories, 26.1% of patients (N=10,035) reported being helped by the very first professional they saw. Persisting to a second professional after a first unhelpful treatment brought the cumulative probability of receiving helpful treatment to 51.2%. If patients persisted with up through eight professionals, the cumulative probability rose to 90.6%. However, only an estimated 22.8% of patients would have persisted in seeing these many professionals after repeatedly receiving treatments they considered not helpful. Although the proportion of individuals with disorders who sought treatment was higher and they were more persistent in HICs than LMICs, proportional helpfulness among treated cases was no different between HICs and LMICs. A wide range of predictors of perceived treatment helpfulness were found, some of them consistent across diagnostic categories and others unique to specific disorders. These results provide novel information about patient evaluations of treatment across diagnoses and countries varying in income level, and suggest that a critical issue in improving the quality of care for mental disorders should be fostering persistence in professional help-seeking if earlier treatments are not helpful.
患者报告的治疗有效性是患者为中心的医疗质量的重要指标。我们在家庭调查的受访者中研究了其途径和预测因素,这些受访者报告曾接受过针对重度抑郁症、广泛性焦虑症、社交恐惧症、特定恐惧症、创伤后应激障碍、双相情感障碍或酒精使用障碍的治疗。数据来自30项社区流行病学调查——17项在高收入国家(HICs),13项在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)——作为世界卫生组织(WHO)世界心理健康(WMH)调查的一部分进行。受访者被问及每种疾病的治疗是否有帮助,如果有帮助,在接受有帮助的治疗之前看过的专业人员数量。在所有调查和诊断类别中,26.1%的患者(N = 10,035)报告说他们见到的第一位专业人员就对他们有帮助。首次治疗无帮助后继续找第二位专业人员,接受有帮助治疗的累积概率达到51.2%。如果患者一直看了八位专业人员,累积概率上升到90.6%。然而,估计只有22.8%的患者在多次接受他们认为无帮助的治疗后还会坚持看这么多专业人员。虽然患有疾病寻求治疗的个体比例在高收入国家比低收入和中等收入国家更高且更有坚持性,但接受治疗病例中的比例性有效性在高收入国家和低收入和中等收入国家之间没有差异。发现了一系列感知治疗有效性的预测因素,其中一些在诊断类别中是一致的,另一些则是特定疾病所特有的。这些结果提供了关于不同收入水平的诊断和国家中患者对治疗评估的新信息,并表明在改善精神障碍护理质量方面的一个关键问题应该是,如果早期治疗无帮助,要促进坚持寻求专业帮助。