Maj Mario, van Os Jim, De Hert Marc, Gaebel Wolfgang, Galderisi Silvana, Green Michael F, Guloksuz Sinan, Harvey Philip D, Jones Peter B, Malaspina Dolores, McGorry Patrick, Miettunen Jouko, Murray Robin M, Nuechterlein Keith H, Peralta Victor, Thornicroft Graham, van Winkel Ruud, Ventura Joseph
Department of Psychiatry, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Department of Psychiatry, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
World Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;20(1):4-33. doi: 10.1002/wps.20809.
The current management of patients with primary psychosis worldwide is often remarkably stereotyped. In almost all cases an antipsychotic medica-tion is prescribed, with second-generation antipsychotics usually preferred to first-generation ones. Cognitive behavioral therapy is rarely used in the vast majority of countries, although there is evidence to support its efficacy. Psychosocial interventions are often provided, especially in chronic cases, but those applied are frequently not validated by research. Evidence-based family interventions and supported employment programs are seldom implemented in ordinary practice. Although the notion that patients with primary psychosis are at increased risk for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus is widely shared, it is not frequent that appropriate measures be implemented to address this problem. The view that the management of the patient with primary psychosis should be personalized is endorsed by the vast majority of clinicians, but this personalization is lacking or inadequate in most clinical contexts. Although many mental health services would declare themselves "recovery-oriented", it is not common that a focus on empowerment, identity, meaning and resilience is ensured in ordinary practice. The present paper aims to address this situation. It describes systematically the salient domains that should be considered in the characterization of the individual patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management. These include positive and negative symptom dimensions, other psychopathological components, onset and course, neurocognition and social cognition, neurodevelopmental indicators; social functioning, quality of life and unmet needs; clinical staging, antecedent and concomitant psychiatric conditions, physical comorbidities, family history, history of obstetric complications, early and recent environmental exposures, protective factors and resilience, and internalized stigma. For each domain, simple assessment instruments are identified that could be considered for use in clinical practice and included in standardized decision tools. A management of primary psychosis is encouraged which takes into account all the available treatment modalities whose efficacy is supported by research evidence, selects and modulates them in the individual patient on the basis of the clinical characterization, addresses the patient's needs in terms of employment, housing, self-care, social relationships and education, and offers a focus on identity, meaning and resilience.
目前,全球范围内对原发性精神病患者的管理往往非常刻板。几乎在所有情况下,都会开出抗精神病药物,第二代抗精神病药物通常比第一代更受青睐。认知行为疗法在绝大多数国家很少使用,尽管有证据支持其有效性。心理社会干预措施经常提供,尤其是在慢性病患者中,但所采用的这些干预措施往往未经研究验证。循证家庭干预措施和支持性就业项目在日常实践中很少实施。虽然原发性精神病患者患心血管疾病和糖尿病的风险增加这一观点已被广泛认同,但针对这一问题采取适当措施的情况并不常见。绝大多数临床医生都认可原发性精神病患者的管理应个性化这一观点,但在大多数临床环境中,这种个性化却缺失或不足。尽管许多心理健康服务机构会宣称自己是“以康复为导向”的,但在日常实践中,确保关注赋权、身份认同、意义和复原力的情况并不常见。本文旨在解决这一现状。它系统地描述了在对原发性精神病个体患者进行特征描述以实现管理个性化时应考虑的显著领域。这些领域包括阳性和阴性症状维度、其他精神病理成分、起病和病程、神经认知和社会认知、神经发育指标;社会功能、生活质量和未满足的需求;临床分期、既往和伴随的精神疾病状况、躯体合并症、家族史、产科并发症史、早期和近期的环境暴露、保护因素和复原力,以及内化的耻辱感。对于每个领域,都确定了一些简单的评估工具,可考虑在临床实践中使用并纳入标准化决策工具中。鼓励对原发性精神病进行管理时,要考虑到所有有研究证据支持其疗效的可用治疗方式,根据临床特征在个体患者中选择和调整这些治疗方式,解决患者在就业、住房、自我护理、社会关系和教育方面的需求,并关注身份认同、意义和复原力。