Sayed Ahmed, Abdelfattah Omar M, Munir Malak, Shazly Omar, Awad Ahmed K, Ghaith Hazem S, Moustafa Khaled, Gerew Maria, Guha Avirup, Barac Ana, Fradley Michael G, Abela George S, Addison Daniel
Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Medicine, Morristown Medical Center, Atlantic Health System, Morristown, NJ, USA.
Eur J Cancer. 2022 Jul;169:82-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.024. Epub 2022 May 4.
Cardioprotective therapies represent an important avenue to reduce treatment-limiting cardiotoxicities in patients receiving chemotherapy. However, the optimal duration, strategy and long-term efficacy of empiric cardio-protection remains unknown.
Leveraging the MEDLINE/Pubmed, CENTRAL and clinicaltrials.gov databases, we identified all randomised controlled trials investigating cardioprotective therapies from inception to November 2021 (PROSPERO-ID:CRD42021265006). Cardioprotective classes included ACEIs, ARBs, Beta-blockers, dexrazoxane (DEX), statins and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. The primary end-point was new-onset heart failure (HF). Secondary outcomes were the mean difference in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) change, hypotension and all-cause mortality. Network meta-analyses were used to assess the cardioprotective effects of each therapy to deduce the most effective therapies. Both analyses were performed using a Bayesian random effects model to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI).
Overall, from 726 articles, 39 trials evaluating 5931 participants (38.0 ± 19.1 years, 72.0% females) were identified. The use of any cardioprotective strategy associated with reduction in new-onset HF (RR:0.32; 95% CrI:0.19-0.55), improved LVEF (mean difference: 3.92%; 95% CrI:2.81-5.07), increased hypotension (RR:3.27; 95% CrI:1.38-9.87) and no difference in mortality. Based on control arms, the number-needed-to-treat for 'any' cardioprotective therapy to prevent one incident HF event was 45, including a number-needed-to-treat of 21 with ≥1 year of therapy. Dexrazoxane was most effective at HF prevention (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve: 81.47%), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were most effective at preserving LVEF (Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking curve: 99.22%).
Cardiotoxicity remains a challenge for patients requiring anticancer therapies. The initiation of extended duration cardioprotection reduces incident HF. Additional head-to-head trials are needed.
心脏保护疗法是减少接受化疗患者治疗限制性心脏毒性的重要途径。然而,经验性心脏保护的最佳持续时间、策略和长期疗效尚不清楚。
利用MEDLINE/Pubmed、CENTRAL和clinicaltrials.gov数据库,我们检索了从开始到2021年11月所有研究心脏保护疗法的随机对照试验(PROSPERO编号:CRD42021265006)。心脏保护类别包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEIs)、血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ARBs)、β受体阻滞剂、右丙亚胺(DEX)、他汀类药物和盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂。主要终点是新发心力衰竭(HF)。次要结局是左心室射血分数(LVEF)变化的平均差异、低血压和全因死亡率。采用网状Meta分析评估每种疗法的心脏保护作用,以推断最有效的疗法。两项分析均使用贝叶斯随机效应模型来估计风险比(RR)和95%可信区间(95%CrI)。
总体而言,从726篇文章中,确定了39项试验,共纳入5931名参与者(年龄38.0±19.1岁,女性占72.0%)。使用任何心脏保护策略均与新发HF减少相关(RR:0.32;95%CrI:0.19 - 0.55),LVEF改善(平均差异:3.92%;95%CrI:2.81 - 5.07),低血压增加(RR:3.27;95%CrI:1.38 - 9.87),死亡率无差异。基于对照臂,“任何”心脏保护疗法预防1例HF事件的需治疗人数为45,其中治疗≥1年的需治疗人数为21。右丙亚胺在预防HF方面最有效(累积排序曲线下面积:81.47%),盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂在保留LVEF方面最有效(累积排序曲线下面积:99.22%)。
心脏毒性仍然是需要抗癌治疗患者面临的挑战。延长心脏保护的起始时间可减少HF的发生。还需要更多的直接比较试验。